You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2008/09/23 19:52:52 UTC
Test Scenarios, was Fwd: 1.3.2 RC0
Hey Dave
Are these tests something that would be of interest to the Tuscany
community ? Have you thought about the possibility of donating this
test suite to Tuscany ?
Thanks
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: 1.3.2 RC0
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Hey Simon,
We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository
to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously
if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that!
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
>> present in RC1?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2 up
>> > here
>> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/). No maven artifacts
>> > yet.
>> >
>> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It looks
>> > like a
>> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going to
>> > have
>> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at
>> > this
>> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
>> >
>> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>
> Hi Dave
>
> I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps.
>
> Simon
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Test Scenarios, was Fwd: 1.3.2 RC0
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Just FYI, we have done some work in the past to allow automation of
Tuscany iTests under : Tomcat, Jetty, Geronimo and Websphere. We have
just added a subset of iTests to run using this, but you should be
able to leverage this if you want. To run, execute the following maven
command from the iTest folder :
mvn -Pwebapp,websphere clean install
Note: for websphere, you should have WAS_HOME env variable set properly.
Also, adding support for weblogic might not be that hard.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Luciano,
>
> I'll have to look into the tests to see if there is any coverage that
> isn't provided by the Tuscany unit/itests - the main purpose of this
> suite of tests is to execute our range of use cases, but to do so on
> application servers that currently aren't covered by the automated
> Tuscany tests, such as websphere and weblogic.
>
> I'll get back to you on this, once I find some spare time to look into it :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey Dave
>>
>> Are these tests something that would be of interest to the Tuscany
>> community ? Have you thought about the possibility of donating this
>> test suite to Tuscany ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM
>> Subject: Re: 1.3.2 RC0
>> To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
>>
>>
>> Hey Simon,
>>
>> We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository
>> to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously
>> if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>
>>>> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
>>>> present in RC1?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Dave.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2 up
>>>> > here
>>>> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/). No maven artifacts
>>>> > yet.
>>>> >
>>>> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It looks
>>>> > like a
>>>> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going to
>>>> > have
>>>> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at
>>>> > this
>>>> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
>>>> >
>>>> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> >
>>>> > Simon
>>>> >
>>>
>>> Hi Dave
>>>
>>> I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps.
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Test Scenarios, was Fwd: 1.3.2 RC0
Posted by Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>.
Hey Luciano,
I'll have to look into the tests to see if there is any coverage that
isn't provided by the Tuscany unit/itests - the main purpose of this
suite of tests is to execute our range of use cases, but to do so on
application servers that currently aren't covered by the automated
Tuscany tests, such as websphere and weblogic.
I'll get back to you on this, once I find some spare time to look into it :)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Dave
>
> Are these tests something that would be of interest to the Tuscany
> community ? Have you thought about the possibility of donating this
> test suite to Tuscany ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM
> Subject: Re: 1.3.2 RC0
> To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
>
>
> Hey Simon,
>
> We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository
> to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously
> if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
>>> present in RC1?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2 up
>>> > here
>>> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/). No maven artifacts
>>> > yet.
>>> >
>>> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It looks
>>> > like a
>>> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going to
>>> > have
>>> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at
>>> > this
>>> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
>>> >
>>> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> > Simon
>>> >
>>
>> Hi Dave
>>
>> I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>