You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "Joseph Witt (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/08/09 21:15:23 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2530) Template authorization - Fall back to Process Group

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15414248#comment-15414248 ] 

Joseph Witt commented on NIFI-2530:
-----------------------------------

[~mcgilman] It seems to me that permissions of the templates really only need to be #1 or #3.  The concept of #2 applying I'm not sure makes sense.  We're not talking about 'the instance of those components' on the flow but rather a template/snapshot of that item.  #1 allows specific templates to be locked down if needed and #3 provides sensible defaults.  But #2 is extending the concept of a 'component' to be both its actual instance on a flow and also any 'copies' of it made as templates.

Do you agree?

> Template authorization - Fall back to Process Group
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-2530
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2530
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>            Reporter: Matt Gilman
>            Assignee: Matt Gilman
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> Template authorization strategy in order:
> 1 - Explicit policy on template
> 2 - Authorize based on permissions of underlying components
> 3 - Authorize based on parent Process Group
> Currently, only 1 and 2 are checked. Need to fall back to parent Process Group.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)