Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0 - (Yes Again :->)

[Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>]

All good things are three :-D

+1


On 17. feb. 2010, at 20.03, Richard Hirsch wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have posted our candidate for the first Apache release developed
> within the ESME podling.
> 
> The candidate can be found at
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erhirsch/esme/>
> 
> See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release
> candidate is a tar archive of the sources in
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incubating/<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1.0-incubating>
> 
> The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0-
> src.tar.gz release package is
> 
> 8E 43 0D DF F8 FE 15 9B  22 47 C2 C0 CC 30 21 2C
> 
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if
> a majority of at least three +1  ESME PPMC votes is reached. Assuming
> the vote passes, I will ask the Incubator PMC to approve the release.
> 
>  [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating
>  [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Here's my +1.
> 
> Since the last release attempt, the following changes have been made
> * Updated README to indicate that ESME currently just supports JDK 1.6
> * Removed license reference from the README
> * Removed GPL-licensed and other unused dependencies from pom.xml.  (Thanks
> Ethan)
>  Perform "mvn site" to see the current dependencies. The only dependencies
>  only license information are the com.twitter.* jars and I was unabled to
> find
>  licensing info. Although newer versions in github are licensed with Apache
> 
>  License
> * Pom.xml no longer refers to lift snapshot but to the "1.1-M8" version
> * Changed version in pom.xml to
> <version>apache-esme-1.0-incubating</version>
> * removed svn files from release
> * directory created by release is no longer called "trunk"
> * Checked SHA signature on signed release but this should be a diff between
> SHA1
>  and SHA512
> 
> 
> Dick Hirsch