Re: An update on Tinkerpop OGM/ORM Benchmarks including Tinkerpop3

[Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <fr...@gmail.com>]

In case it is of any use to you guys (I just saw these messages now, I know 
its a year late)... 1) Ferma is now on an Apache v2 license. So no worries 
there. 2) I havent done recent TP3 benchmarks, anyone have any they can 
point me to so I can evaluate if i can start recommending TP3 yet?

On Monday, 27 July 2015 09:10:23 UTC-4, Rômulo Victor wrote:
>
> Hi Jeffrey,
> I have a question concerning the license used by the Ferma project, which 
> is OSCL type C. From what I've read here 
> <http://wiki.syncleus.com/index.php/Syncleus:Open_Source_Community_License_-_Type_C>, 
> it is more restrictive than Apache License but less restrictive than GPL. 
> Is that correct? Could you please explain how they differ?
> Thanks for your attention.
>
> Em segunda-feira, 13 de julho de 2015 14:36:23 UTC-3, Jeffrey Freeman 
> escreveu:
>>
>> Hey guys. You might recall my post from a little while back comparing the 
>> various ORM/OGM including benchmarks of them all (Totorom, Frames, Ferma, 
>> Blueprints, and Gremlin). Well thanks to the contribution of the Peapod 
>> developer we now also expanded these benchmarks to compare against Peapod 
>> and Tinkerpop3, So I wanted to share the results with everyone here.
>>
>> The results for Tinkerpop3 were less than promising showing a huge 
>> performance hit in the new version over the old something on the order of 
>> 10x slower or more. Since Peapod is built on Tinkerpop3 it suffers the same 
>> poor performance (and adds some overhead of its own of course).
>>
>> The full results can be viewed on this page, it also includes a link to 
>> the GitHub project hosting the code for the benchmarks:
>> http://wiki.syncleus.com/index.php/Ferma:Comparing_the_Alternatives
>>
>