You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/01/30 10:57:41 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16587] New: - WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is mandatory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16587>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16587

WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is mandatory

           Summary: WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is mandatory
           Product: Axis-WSIF
           Version: current (nightly)
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Basic Architecture
        AssignedTo: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
        ReportedBy: antelder@apache.org


The WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is defined as being mandatory :
http://ws.apache.org/wsif/providers/wsdl_extensions/java_extension.html

Is this really neccessary? I don't see whay it couldn't be optional like the
rest of the java:operation attributes, and default to the portType operation
name. This would make writting the WSDL for a Java binding much easier.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16587] New: - WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is mandatory

Posted by Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>.
Nirmal Mukhi wrote:

> Yes, I think so too. Back when we were defining this I believe we 
> planned to make it optional, this might just have been a typo. Anybody 
> have issues with making it optional? All this would require would be a 
> change to the doc that described the java binding extensions and a 
> (probably minor) change to the java provider.
>
> Also exactly the same argument applies to the EJB binding extension, 
> where I believe the method name should be optional too, and should 
> default to the WSDL operation name.

hi,

i think that optional in both cases make sense and even more importantly 
makes easier to write WSDL bindings so we should do this

alek

-- 
"Mr. Pauli, we in the audience are all agreed that your theory is crazy. 
What divides us is whether it is crazy enough to be true." Niels H. D. Bohr

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16587] New: - WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is mandatory

Posted by Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>.
Nirmal Mukhi wrote:

> Yes, I think so too. Back when we were defining this I believe we 
> planned to make it optional, this might just have been a typo. Anybody 
> have issues with making it optional? All this would require would be a 
> change to the doc that described the java binding extensions and a 
> (probably minor) change to the java provider.
>
> Also exactly the same argument applies to the EJB binding extension, 
> where I believe the method name should be optional too, and should 
> default to the WSDL operation name.

hi,

i think that optional in both cases make sense and even more importantly 
makes easier to write WSDL bindings so we should do this

alek

-- 
"Mr. Pauli, we in the audience are all agreed that your theory is crazy. 
What divides us is whether it is crazy enough to be true." Niels H. D. Bohr

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16587] New: - WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is mandatory

Posted by Nirmal Mukhi <nm...@us.ibm.com>.
Hi,

Yes, I think so too. Back when we were defining this I believe we planned 
to make it optional, this might just have been a typo. Anybody have issues 
with making it optional? All this would require would be a change to the 
doc that described the java binding extensions and a (probably minor) 
change to the java provider.

Also exactly the same argument applies to the EJB binding extension, where 
I believe the method name should be optional too, and should default to 
the WSDL operation name.

Nirmal.




bugzilla@apache.org
01/30/2003 04:57 AM
Please respond to axis-dev
 
        To:     axis-dev@xml.apache.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16587] New:  -     WSDL 
java:operation methodName attribute is mandatory


DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16587>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16587

WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is mandatory

           Summary: WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is mandatory
           Product: Axis-WSIF
           Version: current (nightly)
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Basic Architecture
        AssignedTo: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
        ReportedBy: antelder@apache.org


The WSDL java:operation methodName attribute is defined as being mandatory 
:
http://ws.apache.org/wsif/providers/wsdl_extensions/java_extension.html

Is this really neccessary? I don't see whay it couldn't be optional like 
the
rest of the java:operation attributes, and default to the portType 
operation
name. This would make writting the WSDL for a Java binding much easier.