You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@stanbol.apache.org by "Alberto Musetti (Created) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/12/12 17:23:30 UTC
[jira] [Created] (STANBOL-418) Issue in the usage of rules with
reasoners
Issue in the usage of rules with reasoners
------------------------------------------
Key: STANBOL-418
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418
Project: Stanbol
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Reasoners, Rules
Reporter: Alberto Musetti
I created a rule, but the reasoning has not produced any inference even if the rule was created ad-hoc to cause materializations
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [jira] [Created] (STANBOL-418) Issue in the usage of rules with reasoners
Posted by Enrico Daga <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alberto,
could you describe the process you followed?
Which rule did your created, which reasoning service have you invoked?
Enrico
On 12 December 2011 17:23, Alberto Musetti (Created) (JIRA)
<ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> Issue in the usage of rules with reasoners
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-418
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Reasoners, Rules
> Reporter: Alberto Musetti
>
>
> I created a rule, but the reasoning has not produced any inference even if the rule was created ad-hoc to cause materializations
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
--
Enrico Daga
--
http://www.enridaga.net
skype: enri-pan
[jira] [Resolved] (STANBOL-418) Issue in the usage of rules with
reasoners
Posted by "Fabian Christ (Resolved) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Fabian Christ resolved STANBOL-418.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Issue in the usage of rules with reasoners
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-418
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Reasoners, Rules
> Reporter: Alberto Musetti
>
> I created a rule, but the reasoning has not produced any inference even if the rule was created ad-hoc to cause materializations
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (STANBOL-418) Issue in the usage of rules with
reasoners
Posted by "Andrea Nuzzolese (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13173339#comment-13173339 ]
Andrea Nuzzolese commented on STANBOL-418:
------------------------------------------
The bug was due to an erroneous generation of object URIs during the conversion of the Stanbol rules to the Jena rules. Namely, quoted URIs were further embedded in other quote.
As a consequence the reasoner service based on jena did not perform the classification properly.
The bug has been fixed for those classes that presented the problem, i.e., ClassAtom, DatavaluedPropertyAtom and IndividualPropertyAtom.
> Issue in the usage of rules with reasoners
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-418
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Reasoners, Rules
> Reporter: Alberto Musetti
>
> I created a rule, but the reasoning has not produced any inference even if the rule was created ad-hoc to cause materializations
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (STANBOL-418) Issue in the usage of
rules with reasoners
Posted by "Alberto Musetti (Issue Comment Edited) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13173310#comment-13173310 ]
Alberto Musetti edited comment on STANBOL-418 at 12/20/11 5:09 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I have tried this easy test:
Menu.owl: there is an individual "margherita" rdf:type Pizza
Food.owl: there are the classes Food and Pizza
recipe.txt: if(x rdf:type Pizza) -> (x rdf:type Food)
Result:
- reasoners/owl2/classify (Hermit): produces the inference that "margherita" is rdf:type Pizza and also Food.
- reasoners/owl/classify (Jena): otherwise, dosn't prodoce the inference that "margherita" rdf:type Food
was (Author: alberto.musetti):
I have tried this easy test:
Menu.owl: there is an individual "margherita" rdf:type Pizza
Food.owl: there are the classes Food and Pizza
recipe.txt: if(x rdf:type Pizza) -> (x rdf:type Food)
Result:
- Hermit produces the inference that "margherita" is rdf:type Pizza and also Food.
- Jena, otherwise, dosn't prodoce the inference that "margherita" rdf:type Food
> Issue in the usage of rules with reasoners
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-418
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Reasoners, Rules
> Reporter: Alberto Musetti
>
> I created a rule, but the reasoning has not produced any inference even if the rule was created ad-hoc to cause materializations
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (STANBOL-418) Issue in the usage of rules with
reasoners
Posted by "Alberto Musetti (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13173310#comment-13173310 ]
Alberto Musetti commented on STANBOL-418:
-----------------------------------------
I have tried this easy test:
Menu.owl: there is an individual "margherita" rdf:type Pizza
Food.owl: there are the classes Food and Pizza
recipe.txt: if(x rdf:type Pizza) -> (x rdf:type Food)
Result:
- Hermit produces the inference that "margherita" is rdf:type Pizza and also Food.
- Jena, otherwise, dosn't prodoce the inference that "margherita" rdf:type Food
> Issue in the usage of rules with reasoners
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-418
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-418
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Reasoners, Rules
> Reporter: Alberto Musetti
>
> I created a rule, but the reasoning has not produced any inference even if the rule was created ad-hoc to cause materializations
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira