You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cloudstack.apache.org by "John Kinsella (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/11/19 18:25:11 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-9070) 4.5.x source downloads from apache.org fail gpg integrity test

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

John Kinsella resolved CLOUDSTACK-9070.
---------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed
      Assignee: John Kinsella  (was: Rohit Yadav)

Rohit added his key into the KEYS file...after importing that, I'm able to verify the release now:

$ gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-4.5.2-src.tar.bz2.asc
gpg: Signature made Wed Aug 19 02:13:04 2015 PDT using RSA key ID 0EE3D884
gpg: Good signature from "Rohit Yadav (CODE SIGNING KEY) <bh...@apache.org>”

Closing ticket.

> 4.5.x source downloads from apache.org fail gpg integrity test
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9070
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9070
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: Install and Setup
>    Affects Versions: 4.5.1, 4.5.2
>            Reporter: Udo Rader
>            Assignee: John Kinsella
>
> as described in 
> http://markmail.org/message/37udf7djizul5xuf 
> the currently available source downloads fail the gpg integrity check because the key used to sign the packages is missing from 
> http://www.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/KEYS
> -------CUT-----
> [udo@artio Downloads]$ gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-4.5.2-src.tar.bz2.asc
> gpg: assuming signed data in `apache-cloudstack-4.5.2-src.tar.bz2'
> gpg: Signature made Wed 19 Aug 2015 11:13:04 AM CEST using RSA key ID
> 0EE3D884
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> -------CUT-----
> applies to 4.5.1 and 4.5.2 at least. 
> At least to me this makes the integrity of the source downloads dubious ...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)