You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to gitbox@activemq.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/10/23 07:37:59 UTC

[GitHub] [activemq-artemis-native] michaelandrepearce edited a comment on pull request #10: ARTEMIS-2945 Artemis native JNI code can be replaced by Java

michaelandrepearce edited a comment on pull request #10:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-native/pull/10#issuecomment-715077056


   To note, I've been testing this branch against master using an independent test rig with large real servers we use. And it corroborate the above stats, we are seeing in most parts no perf difference. As raised privately to Franz but putting it here for public. Synthetic performance != real use cases. I would suggest whilst we switch ASYNCIO over to this newer implementation, we should add another configuration ASYNCIO_LEGACY for a few releases so if anyone does see a perf drop in real usecases they can switch back to the legacy jni one quickly. And report the issue 


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org