RE: Branch Differences between 2_1_fcs and trunk

["Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>]

Stefano Bagnara wrote:

> Will the new version run under Loom?

I don't know.  Hopefully so, but someone would have to test that and report
back.

>   - trunk has some experimental changes that won't be kept.

> I've seen there is a lot of code change to move from avalon Components
> (Deprecated) to avalon Services: will this be kept?

Yes, those were the bulk of the changes we kept from trunk.

> I see there are still 3 references to avalon components:
> AvalonMailStore, AvalonUserStore, filepair/RepositoryManager

Still?

	--- Noel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org

Re: Branch Differences between 2_1_fcs and trunk

[ap...@bago.org]

> > I see there are still 3 references to avalon components:
> > AvalonMailStore, AvalonUserStore, filepair/RepositoryManager
> 
> Still?

Noel, I sent the message you're relplying to on April, the 6th.

Now I see that:

Composable interface is still used in RepositoryManager,
UsersLDAPRepository, AvalonMailStore and AvalonUsersStore.
ComponentManager is still used in UsersLDAPRepository.java
Component is still implemented by AbstractUsersRepository.

Stefano


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org