You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@ignite.apache.org by "rpuch (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/06/09 11:58:56 UTC

[GitHub] [ignite-3] rpuch commented on a diff in pull request #2173: IGNITE-19690 Get rid of configuration in MvTableStorage and related classes

rpuch commented on code in PR #2173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/2173#discussion_r1224200155


##########
modules/storage-api/src/testFixtures/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/storage/impl/TestStorageEngine.java:
##########
@@ -39,19 +39,16 @@ public String name() {
         return ENGINE_NAME;
     }
 
-    /** {@inheritDoc} */
     @Override
     public void start() throws StorageException {
         // No-op.
     }
 
-    /** {@inheritDoc} */
     @Override
     public void stop() throws StorageException {
         // No-op.
     }
 
-    /** {@inheritDoc} */
     @Override
     public MvTableStorage createMvTable(TableConfiguration tableCfg, TablesConfiguration tablesCfg,

Review Comment:
   Do we still need `tableCfg` parameter here? It looks like we are only interested in table ID from it.
   
   Also, do we need `tablesCfg`?
   
   And what about distribution zone cfg: would it be better to pass some kind of config-agnostic object (zone descriptor?) containing partitions count (and something else, probably)?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@ignite.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org