You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2017/08/29 18:57:29 UTC

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1

The vote passes, with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received:

+1 Marshall Schor

+1 Burn Lewis

+1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik

Thanks to everyone who reviewed and voted on this release.

-Marshall


On 8/22/2017 4:29 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> uimaj-2.10.1 rc1 is posted and ready for voting.
>
> The issues fixed are here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/UIMA/versions/12340281#release-report-tab-body
>
> The source and binary zip/tars are here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/2.10.1-rc1/artifacts
>
> The eclipse update site is here (no need to download it, you can install
> directly from here)
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/2.10.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site-uimaj
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1153/
>
> SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.10.1/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0   Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>


Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1

Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Hi,

Thanks for testing, even if it's after the fact... :-)

The iteration order was slightly changed for otherwise equal feature structures
to improve reproducibility.

Before, if you had a lot of instances of FS (say a subtype of Annotation) with
the same begin and end, and you removed one from the index, and later
re-inserted it, it would go back in some arbitrary spot among the set of equal
begin/end items.

While this is "correct" (in that the order within comparator-equal items is not
specified), if the index is iterated over, the order of the iteration could
change due to this.  The fix was to insure it was put back in the same sequence
as before, so the iteration order (all other things being the same) would be
constant.

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5533

Cheers. -Marshall


On 8/30/2017 4:55 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Thanks for the release! Sorry I didn't make the vote (again).
>
> I just upgraded DKPro Core to the new version. Due to the change
> in iteration order, I had to update a few unit tests, but otherwise
> all appears to be fine.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
>> On 29.08.2017, at 20:57, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>> The vote passes, with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received:
>>
>> +1 Marshall Schor
>>
>> +1 Burn Lewis
>>
>> +1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who reviewed and voted on this release.
>>
>> -Marshall
>


Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1

Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the release! Sorry I didn't make the vote (again).

I just upgraded DKPro Core to the new version. Due to the change
in iteration order, I had to update a few unit tests, but otherwise
all appears to be fine.

Cheers,

-- Richard

> On 29.08.2017, at 20:57, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> 
> The vote passes, with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received:
> 
> +1 Marshall Schor
> 
> +1 Burn Lewis
> 
> +1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik
> 
> Thanks to everyone who reviewed and voted on this release.
> 
> -Marshall