You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/17 19:49:51 UTC
[VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after (R-T-C)
documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
This vote is open for 72 hours
Thanks in advance for participating!
-A
definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Calling this vote closed - with 6 +1s and 4 +0s, the vote passes.
A.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +0 and probably late. =)
>
> A.
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> 2013/5/18 Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com>:
>> > As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
>> > procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after
>> (R-T-C)
>> > documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
>> >
>> > Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
>> > voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
>> >
>> > This vote is open for 72 hours
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance for participating!
>> > -A
>> >
>> > definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
>> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
>> > rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
+0 and probably late. =)
A.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> 2013/5/18 Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com>:
> > As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
> > procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after (R-T-C)
> > documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
> >
> > Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
> > voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
> >
> > This vote is open for 72 hours
> >
> > Thanks in advance for participating!
> > -A
> >
> > definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> > rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
+1
2013/5/18 Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com>:
> As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
> procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after (R-T-C)
> documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
>
> Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
> voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
>
> This vote is open for 72 hours
>
> Thanks in advance for participating!
> -A
>
> definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
--
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com>.
"does not" corrected in a follow-up email.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com>wrote:
> Voting in favor of this does block requests for review.
>>>
>>
> "does" or "does not"?
>
> ap
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by
contributors
Posted by Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com>.
>> Voting in favor of this does block requests for review.
"does" or "does not"?
ap
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com>wrote:
> As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
> procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after (R-T-C)
> documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
>
> Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
> voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
>
> This vote is open for 72 hours
>
> Thanks in advance for participating!
> -A
>
> definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by
contributors
Posted by Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com>.
+0
> +0
>
> On Friday, 17 May 2013, Matt Stephenson wrote:
>
>> +0
>> On May 17, 2013 11:25 AM, "Ioannis Canellos"
>> <iocanel@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Andrew Gaul
>> <gaul@apache.org<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0700, Adrian Cole wrote:
>> > > > typo. apologies. "Voting in favor of this does *not* block requests
>> for
>> > > > review."
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Cole <
>> adrian.f.cole@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> > > >wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this
>> is a
>> > > > > procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after
>> > > (R-T-C)
>> > > > > documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither
>> does
>> > > > > voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This vote is open for 72 hours
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks in advance for participating!
>> > > > > -A
>> > > > >
>> > > > > definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
>> > > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
>> > > > > rules of procedural vote:
>> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Andrew Gaul
>> > > http://gaul.org/
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Ioannis Canellos*
>> > *
>> >
>> > **
>> > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>> > **
>> > Twitter: iocanel
>> > *
>> >
>>
>
--
Andrew Phillips
qrmedia
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential.
Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are
not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of
this e-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it
is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee,
please inform the sender immediately.
This message is confidential and may not be redistributed or
broadcast in whole or part in any form, including but not limited
to any form of internet transmission including email, usenet,
newsgroups, www, irc, icq, etc.
All liability for errors and viruses is disclaimed.
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Ignasi <ig...@gmail.com>.
+0
On Friday, 17 May 2013, Matt Stephenson wrote:
> +0
> On May 17, 2013 11:25 AM, "Ioannis Canellos" <iocanel@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Andrew Gaul <gaul@apache.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0700, Adrian Cole wrote:
> > > > typo. apologies. "Voting in favor of this does *not* block requests
> for
> > > > review."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Cole <
> adrian.f.cole@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this
> is a
> > > > > procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after
> > > (R-T-C)
> > > > > documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
> > > > >
> > > > > Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither
> does
> > > > > voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote is open for 72 hours
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance for participating!
> > > > > -A
> > > > >
> > > > > definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> > > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> > > > > rules of procedural vote:
> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Gaul
> > > http://gaul.org/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Ioannis Canellos*
> > *
> >
> > **
> > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> > **
> > Twitter: iocanel
> > *
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Matt Stephenson <ma...@mattstep.net>.
+0
On May 17, 2013 11:25 AM, "Ioannis Canellos" <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Andrew Gaul <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0700, Adrian Cole wrote:
> > > typo. apologies. "Voting in favor of this does *not* block requests for
> > > review."
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
> > > > procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after
> > (R-T-C)
> > > > documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
> > > >
> > > > Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
> > > > voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
> > > >
> > > > This vote is open for 72 hours
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance for participating!
> > > > -A
> > > >
> > > > definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> > > > rules of procedural vote:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Gaul
> > http://gaul.org/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Twitter: iocanel
> *
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Andrew Gaul <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0700, Adrian Cole wrote:
> > typo. apologies. "Voting in favor of this does *not* block requests for
> > review."
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> > > As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
> > > procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after
> (R-T-C)
> > > documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
> > >
> > > Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
> > > voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
> > >
> > > This vote is open for 72 hours
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance for participating!
> > > -A
> > >
> > > definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> > > rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> Andrew Gaul
> http://gaul.org/
>
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by
contributors
Posted by Andrew Gaul <ga...@apache.org>.
+1
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0700, Adrian Cole wrote:
> typo. apologies. "Voting in favor of this does *not* block requests for
> review."
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
> > procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after (R-T-C)
> > documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
> >
> > Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
> > voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
> >
> > This vote is open for 72 hours
> >
> > Thanks in advance for participating!
> > -A
> >
> > definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> > rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
Andrew Gaul
http://gaul.org/
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com>.
typo. apologies. "Voting in favor of this does *not* block requests for
review."
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com>wrote:
> As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
> procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after (R-T-C)
> documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
>
> Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
> voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
>
> This vote is open for 72 hours
>
> Thanks in advance for participating!
> -A
>
> definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by
contributors
Posted by Everett Toews <ev...@RACKSPACE.COM>.
+1
Everett
On May 17, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
> As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
> procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after (R-T-C)
> documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
>
> Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
> voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
>
> This vote is open for 72 hours
>
> Thanks in advance for participating!
> -A
>
> definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Re: [VOTE] Do not enforce review on documentation maintenance by contributors
Posted by Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>.
+ 1, nice approach. Lowers the barrier for contributions.
Suresh
On May 17, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Adrian Cole <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As discussed in the thread "Documentation and what's next", this is a
> procedural vote to neither require review before (C-T-R) or after (R-T-C)
> documentation maintenance performed by Contributors.
>
> Voting in favor of this does block requests for review. Neither does
> voting for this imply we cannot reverse offensive documentation.
>
> This vote is open for 72 hours
>
> Thanks in advance for participating!
> -A
>
> definition of Contributor, C-T-R, R-T-C:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
> rules of procedural vote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html