You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> on 2017/10/03 06:04:27 UTC
Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point to.
Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or whatever
name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' branch
or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have some
other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our non-ASDoc
user documentation.
Thoughts?
-Alex
On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per Apache
>Project.
>
>It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining repos
>for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in the
>IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release schedule.
>
>My 2 cents,
>-Alex
>
>On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. Github
>>Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a
>>way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to
>>use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They
>>seem separate and complimentary.
>>
>>Harbs
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs and
>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would
>>>work
>>> well.
>>>
>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>>>
>>> ‹peter
>>>
>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they
>>>>want
>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>>>>
>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>>>>
>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does
>>>>anyone
>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>>>>
>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A
>>>>wiki
>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Harbs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>>>>u
>>>>es
>>>>
>>>>.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>>>>%
>>>>26
>>>>
>>>>page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpan
>>>>e
>>>>l%
>>>>
>>>>23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c176d8%7
>>>>C
>>>>fa
>>>>
>>>>7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&sdata=%2FSB
>>>>h
>>>>%2
>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>
>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
IMO, flex-docs is for user-facing documentation. IOW, how to use Royale.
The repo wikis are for how to be a developer of the code in the wiki.
Build instructions, release guides, etc. The wikis won't have very much
polish. Most of what is in the Flex Wiki for FlexJS can end up in the
repo wikis except the places where we tried to write user-facing
documentation.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 10/3/17, 7:57 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I see that we have repo for docs [1] and gh-pages working [2]. I would
>like
>to start putting somewhere information in the Olaf's structure [3], of
>course let's change whatever you think to have better one.
>
>The question is - Where such things should landed in royale-docs or in
>royale-asjs - WIKI tab ?
>
>[1]
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-docs&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c76b08d50ad3a65
>c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426826503113618&sdata=WZ
>Osb89uXL3s8nrHjRVSaSkmsuWUyQSxMMJS%2BN9O4Xo%3D&reserved=0
>[2]
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.gi
>thub.io%2Froyale-docs%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c76b08d50ad3a65
>c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426826503113618&sdata=wl
>p%2BocJ1mKV6%2BXy8ELZP2u4cWLLSe8NMhmLrFIUMR0g%3D&reserved=0
>[3]
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c7
>6b08d50ad3a65c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63642682650311
>3618&sdata=ZKmxBa7gPxIxZof0c4MlzOZktzXDmyj6bgEJmN%2FA0%2BE%3D&reserved=0
>
>Thanks,
>Piotr
>
>2017-10-03 23:57 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
>>
>> Get Outlook for
>>Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c76b08d50ad3a65c%7Cfa7b
>>1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426826503113618&sdata=eJZnrMxUG
>>kvlKJxZJZq9COzf2zW4D3%2FpZZuSojPzXy0%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>>
>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>>
>> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
>>content?
>> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
>>Pages.
>> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >
>> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>> >>
>> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Alex,
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>> >>> started
>> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
>>where
>> in
>> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
>> into
>> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>> >>>
>> >>> [1]
>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>> >>> o
>> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>> >>> 2
>> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>> >>> 2
>> >>>
>>6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Piotr
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>>> royale-docs is good.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>> >>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>> Om
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>> >>>> point
>> >>>> to.
>> >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>> >>>> whatever
>> >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
>>'master'
>> >>>> branch
>> >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>> >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
>>have
>> >>>> some
>> >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>> >>>> non-ASDoc
>> >>>>>> user documentation.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thoughts?
>> >>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
>>per
>> >>>> Apache
>> >>>>>>> Project.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
>>Combining
>> >>>> repos
>> >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples
>>in
>> >>>> the
>> >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>> >>>> schedule.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>> >>>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
>>(i.e.
>> >>>> Github
>> >>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
>>tourjs
>> >>>> in a
>> >>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>> >>>> how to
>> >>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
>>components.
>> >>>> They
>> >>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Harbs
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>> >>>> royale-asjs
>> >>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>> >>>> would
>> >>>>>>>>> work
>> >>>>>>>>> well.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ‹peter
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
>>and
>> >>>> they
>> >>>>>>>>>> want
>> >>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>> >>>> Does
>> >>>>>>>>>> anyone
>> >>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>> >>>> repo? A
>> >>>>>>>>>> wiki
>> >>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>> >>>>>>>>>> u
>> >>>>>>>>>> es
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>> >>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>> >>>>>>>>>> %
>> >>>>>>>>>> 26
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>> >>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>> >>>>>>>>>> e
>> >>>>>>>>>> l%
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>> >>>>>> 76d8%7
>> >>>>>>>>>> C
>> >>>>>>>>>> fa
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>> >>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
>> >>>>>>>>>> h
>> >>>>>>>>>> %2
>> >>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>>
>> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>> >>> skype: zarzycki10
>> >>>
>> >>> LinkedIn:
>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>> >>> d
>> >>>
>>in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>> c2c1
>> >>> %
>> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>> >>> Y
>> >>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>> >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>> >>> e
>> >>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>> >>> d
>> >>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>> >>> 7
>> >>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>> >>>
>> >>> GitHub:
>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>> >>> o
>> >>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>> c2c1%7C
>> >>> f
>> >>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
>> 9yybfI
>> >>> 1
>> >>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>mobile: +48 880 859 557
>skype: zarzycki10
>
>LinkedIn:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linked
>in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c76b08d50ad3a65c%
>7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426826503113618&sdata=36%2
>Fa1I4uygTcNckVwg8MPhSjb36a23UvuV3uafQBa04%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.linke
>din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c
>76b08d50ad3a65c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364268265031
>13618&sdata=X3pnfpbaDVLBaKucf1HVk%2FOdl0x%2BKYa1QDyI2nz33rg%3D&reserved=0>
>
>GitHub:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c76b08d50ad3a65c%7Cf
>a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426826503113618&sdata=jSImG5X
>swEpLX%2BavGfLcTQHvXaGMVE1FQH5OdcvPmdI%3D&reserved=0
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I see that we have repo for docs [1] and gh-pages working [2]. I would like
to start putting somewhere information in the Olaf's structure [3], of
course let's change whatever you think to have better one.
The question is - Where such things should landed in royale-docs or in
royale-asjs - WIKI tab ?
[1] https://github.com/apache/royale-docs
[2] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
[3] https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki
Thanks,
Piotr
2017-10-03 23:57 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
>
> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>
> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>
> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content?
> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages.
> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
> >>
> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Alex,
> >>>
> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
> >>> started
> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where
> in
> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
> into
> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>> o
> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
> >>> 2
> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
> >>> 2
> >>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> royale-docs is good.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Om
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
> >>>> point
> >>>> to.
> >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
> >>>> whatever
> >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master'
> >>>> branch
> >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have
> >>>> some
> >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
> >>>> non-ASDoc
> >>>>>> user documentation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per
> >>>> Apache
> >>>>>>> Project.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining
> >>>> repos
> >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
> >>>> schedule.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e.
> >>>> Github
> >>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs
> >>>> in a
> >>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
> >>>> how to
> >>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components.
> >>>> They
> >>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
> >>>> royale-asjs
> >>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
> >>>> would
> >>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>> well.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ‹peter
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and
> >>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
> >>>> Does
> >>>>>>>>>> anyone
> >>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
> >>>> repo? A
> >>>>>>>>>> wiki
> >>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >>>>>>>>>> u
> >>>>>>>>>> es
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> >>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >>>>>>>>>> %
> >>>>>>>>>> 26
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> >>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >>>>>>>>>> e
> >>>>>>>>>> l%
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> >>>>>> 76d8%7
> >>>>>>>>>> C
> >>>>>>>>>> fa
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> >>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
> >>>>>>>>>> h
> >>>>>>>>>> %2
> >>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>
> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >>> skype: zarzycki10
> >>>
> >>> LinkedIn:
> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
> >>> d
> >>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> c2c1
> >>> %
> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
> >>> Y
> >>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
> >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
> >>> e
> >>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
> >>> d
> >>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
> >>> 7
> >>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>
> >>> GitHub:
> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>> o
> >>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> c2c1%7C
> >>> f
> >>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
> 9yybfI
> >>> 1
> >>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
> (i.e. royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>)
That should have been docs.royalesdk.org <http://docs.roaylesdk.org/>.
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e. royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>) using CNAME entries:
> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/>
>
>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization
>> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have
>> several code repos.
>>
>> The repo is:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs <https://github.com/apache/royale-docs>
>>
>> When you push it becomes available here:
>>
>> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ <https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/>
>>
>> Of course, I could be wrong...
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
>> <omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> This should make things simpler:
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co>
>>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
>>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
>>> 26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D&rese
>>> rved=0
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
>>>>
>>>> Get Outlook for
>>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b
>>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&sdata=0KYVTdYNd
>>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>>>>
>>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
>>>> content?
>>>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
>>>> Pages.
>>>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>>>>>>> started
>>>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
>>>> where
>>>> in
>>>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
>>>> into
>>>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>
>>>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> royale-docs is good.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>>>>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I prefer royale-docs
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>> to.
>>>>>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>>>>>>>> whatever
>>>>>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
>>>> 'master'
>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>>>>>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
>>>> have
>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>>>>>>>> non-ASDoc
>>>>>>>>>> user documentation.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
>>>> per
>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>> Project.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
>>>> Combining
>>>>>>>> repos
>>>>>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples
>>>> in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>>>>>>>> schedule.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
>>>> (i.e.
>>>>>>>> Github
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
>>>> tourjs
>>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>>>>>>>> how to
>>>>>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
>>>> components.
>>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>>>>>>>> royale-asjs
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‹peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
>>>> and
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>>>>>>>> Does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>>>>>>>> repo? A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> es
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>>>>>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>>>>>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> l%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>>>>>>>>>> 76d8%7
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>>>>>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LinkedIn:
>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>>
>>>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>>>> c2c1
>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>>>>>>> Y
>>>>>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
>>>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GitHub:
>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>>>> c2c1%7C
>>>>>>> f
>>>>>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
>>>> 9yybfI
>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Thanks.
The structure there and a lot of the content is great.
We should definitely copy it into docs. We should probably figure out the best way to write the docs and get started… ;-)
I just added a link to his wiki from the docs page for now.
Does anyone think we need a wiki for the docs repo?
Harbs
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here you go -> https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2017-10-04 9:04 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I can’t find Olaf’s wiki. Remind me of the URL?
>>
>>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with
>>> all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point.
>>>
>>> Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that
>> Olaf's
>>> work can be used ?
>>>
>>> Piotr
>>>
>>> 2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com <mailto:
>> harbs.lists@gmail.com>>:
>>>
>>>> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e.
>>>> royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs> <
>> http://royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>>) using CNAME
>> entries:
>>>> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-
>> domain-with-github-pages/ <https://help.github.com/
>> articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/>
>>>> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-
>> domain-with-github-pages/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an
>> organization
>>>>> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have
>>>>> several code repos.
>>>>>
>>>>> The repo is:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs
>>>>>
>>>>> When you push it becomes available here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, I could be wrong...
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>> Muppirala"
>>>>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This should make things simpler:
>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>>>>>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
>>>>>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
>>>>>> 26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl
>>>> VQ%3D&rese
>>>>>> rved=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get Outlook for
>>>>>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.
>>>> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9
>>>> 2538%7Cfa7b
>>>>>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&
>>>> sdata=0KYVTdYNd
>>>>>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
>>>>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
>>>>>>> content?
>>>>>>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
>>>>>>> Pages.
>>>>>>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf
>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> started
>>>>>>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages
>> or
>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting
>> point ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>>>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
>>>>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>>>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>>>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&
>> reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> royale-docs is good.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>>>>>>>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer royale-docs
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content
>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>> to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository
>> (or
>>>>>>>>>>> whatever
>>>>>>>>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
>>>>>>> 'master'
>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>>>>>>>>>>> non-ASDoc
>>>>>>>>>>>>> user documentation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
>>>>>>> per
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
>>>>>>> Combining
>>>>>>>>>>> repos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be
>> examples
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>>>>>>>>>>> schedule.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
>>>>>>> (i.e.
>>>>>>>>>>> Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
>>>>>>> tourjs
>>>>>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial
>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> how to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
>>>>>>> components.
>>>>>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent
>> <pent@adobe.com.INVALID
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for
>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‹peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and
>> royale-website?
>>>>>>>>>>> Does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>>>>>>>>>>> repo? A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> es
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> l%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 76d8%7
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1
>> %7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&
>> reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>>>>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn:
>>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>>>>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>>>>>>> c2c1
>>>>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>>>>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>>>>>>>>>> Y
>>>>>>>>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>>>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
>>>>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>>>>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>>>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>>>>>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>>>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
>>>>>>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> GitHub:
>>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>>>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>>>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>>>>>>> c2c1%7C
>>>>>>>>>> f
>>>>>>>>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=
>>>>>>> 9yybfI
>>>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>
>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>
>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <
>> http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki>
>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552 <
>> https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>>
>>>
>>> GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21 <https://github.com/
>> piotrzarzycki21>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> skype: zarzycki10
>
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>
> GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Here you go -> https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki
Thanks,
Piotr
2017-10-04 9:04 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> I can’t find Olaf’s wiki. Remind me of the URL?
>
> > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with
> > all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point.
> >
> > Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that
> Olaf's
> > work can be used ?
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com <mailto:
> harbs.lists@gmail.com>>:
> >
> >> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e.
> >> royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs> <
> http://royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>>) using CNAME
> entries:
> >> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-
> domain-with-github-pages/ <https://help.github.com/
> articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/>
> >> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-
> domain-with-github-pages/
> >>>
> >>
> >>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an
> organization
> >>> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have
> >>> several code repos.
> >>>
> >>> The repo is:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs
> >>>
> >>> When you push it becomes available here:
> >>>
> >>> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
> >>>
> >>> Of course, I could be wrong...
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> >> Muppirala"
> >>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> This should make things simpler:
> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
> >>>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=
> >> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
> >>>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
> >>>> 26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl
> >> VQ%3D&rese
> >>>> rved=0
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Get Outlook for
> >>>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.
> >> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> >>>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9
> >> 2538%7Cfa7b
> >>>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&
> >> sdata=0KYVTdYNd
> >>>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
> >>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
> >>>>> content?
> >>>>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
> >>>>> Pages.
> >>>>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf
> [1]
> >>>>>>>> started
> >>>>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
> >>>>> where
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages
> or
> >>>>> into
> >>>>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting
> point ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>>>>>>> o
> >>>>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
> >>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
> >>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&
> reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Piotr
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> royale-docs is good.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>>>>>>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I prefer royale-docs
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Om
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content
> to
> >>>>>>>>> point
> >>>>>>>>> to.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository
> (or
> >>>>>>>>> whatever
> >>>>>>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
> >>>>> 'master'
> >>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> >>>>>>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
> >>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
> >>>>>>>>> non-ASDoc
> >>>>>>>>>>> user documentation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
> >>>>> per
> >>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Project.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
> >>>>> Combining
> >>>>>>>>> repos
> >>>>>>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be
> examples
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
> >>>>>>>>> schedule.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
> >>>>> (i.e.
> >>>>>>>>> Github
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
> >>>>> tourjs
> >>>>>>>>> in a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial
> on
> >>>>>>>>> how to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
> >>>>> components.
> >>>>>>>>> They
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent
> <pent@adobe.com.INVALID
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
> >>>>>>>>> royale-asjs
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for
> that
> >>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‹peter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and
> royale-website?
> >>>>>>>>> Does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
> >>>>>>>>> repo? A
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> es
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 26
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> l%
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> >>>>>>>>>>> 76d8%7
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fa
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1
> %7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> >>>>>>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> h
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&
> reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >>>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> LinkedIn:
> >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
> >>>>>>>> d
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> >>>>> c2c1
> >>>>>>>> %
> >>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>>>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
> >>>>>>>> Y
> >>>>>>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
> >>>>>>>> e
> >>>>>>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
> >>>>>>>> d
> >>>>>>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
> >>>>>>>> 7
> >>>>>>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
> >>>>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> GitHub:
> >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>>>>>>> o
> >>>>>>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> >>>>> c2c1%7C
> >>>>>>>> f
> >>>>>>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=
> >>>>> 9yybfI
> >>>>>>>> 1
> >>>>>>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > mobile: +48 880 859 557
> > skype: zarzycki10
> >
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <
> http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki>
> > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552 <
> https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>>
> >
> > GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21 <https://github.com/
> piotrzarzycki21>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I can’t find Olaf’s wiki. Remind me of the URL?
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with
> all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point.
>
> Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that Olaf's
> work can be used ?
>
> Piotr
>
> 2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>
>> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e.
>> royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs> <http://royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>>) using CNAME entries:
>> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/>
>> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/
>>>
>>
>>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization
>>> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have
>>> several code repos.
>>>
>>> The repo is:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs
>>>
>>> When you push it becomes available here:
>>>
>>> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
>>>
>>> Of course, I could be wrong...
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>> Muppirala"
>>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This should make things simpler:
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>>>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=
>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
>>>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
>>>> 26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl
>> VQ%3D&rese
>>>> rved=0
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Get Outlook for
>>>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.
>> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9
>> 2538%7Cfa7b
>>>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&
>> sdata=0KYVTdYNd
>>>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
>>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>>>>>
>>>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
>>>>> content?
>>>>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
>>>>> Pages.
>>>>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>>>>>>>> started
>>>>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
>>>>> where
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
>>>>> into
>>>>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
>>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> royale-docs is good.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>>>>>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I prefer royale-docs
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>> to.
>>>>>>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>>>>>>>>> whatever
>>>>>>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
>>>>> 'master'
>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>>>>>>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>>>>>>>>> non-ASDoc
>>>>>>>>>>> user documentation.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
>>>>> per
>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>> Project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
>>>>> Combining
>>>>>>>>> repos
>>>>>>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>>>>>>>>> schedule.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
>>>>> (i.e.
>>>>>>>>> Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
>>>>> tourjs
>>>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>>>>>>>>> how to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
>>>>> components.
>>>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pent@adobe.com.INVALID
>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‹peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>>>>>>>>> Does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>>>>>>>>> repo? A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> es
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>>>>>>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>>>>>>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> l%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>>>>>>>>>>> 76d8%7
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>>>>>>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn:
>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>>>>> c2c1
>>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>>>>>>>> Y
>>>>>>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
>>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>>>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
>>>>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> GitHub:
>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>>>>>>> o
>>>>>>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>>>>> c2c1%7C
>>>>>>>> f
>>>>>>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
>>>>> 9yybfI
>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> skype: zarzycki10
>
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki>
> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552 <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>>
>
> GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21 <https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with
all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point.
Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that Olaf's
work can be used ?
Piotr
2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e.
> royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>) using CNAME entries:
> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/
> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/
> >
>
> > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization
> > and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have
> > several code repos.
> >
> > The repo is:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/royale-docs
> >
> > When you push it becomes available here:
> >
> > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
> >
> > Of course, I could be wrong...
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala"
> > <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This should make things simpler:
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
> >> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=
> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
> >> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
> >> 26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl
> VQ%3D&rese
> >> rved=0
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
> >>>
> >>> Get Outlook for
> >>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.
> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> >>> aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9
> 2538%7Cfa7b
> >>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&
> sdata=0KYVTdYNd
> >>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
> >>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
> >>>
> >>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
> >>>
> >>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
> >>> content?
> >>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
> >>> Pages.
> >>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Alex,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
> >>>>>> started
> >>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
> >>> where
> >>> in
> >>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
> >>> into
> >>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>>>>> o
> >>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
> >>>>>> 2
> >>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
> >>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>
> >>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Piotr
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> royale-docs is good.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>>>>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I prefer royale-docs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Om
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
> >>>>>>> point
> >>>>>>> to.
> >>>>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
> >>>>>>> whatever
> >>>>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
> >>> 'master'
> >>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> >>>>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
> >>> have
> >>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
> >>>>>>> non-ASDoc
> >>>>>>>>> user documentation.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
> >>> per
> >>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>> Project.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
> >>> Combining
> >>>>>>> repos
> >>>>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples
> >>> in
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
> >>>>>>> schedule.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> >>>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
> >>> (i.e.
> >>>>>>> Github
> >>>>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
> >>> tourjs
> >>>>>>> in a
> >>>>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
> >>>>>>> how to
> >>>>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
> >>> components.
> >>>>>>> They
> >>>>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pent@adobe.com.INVALID
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
> >>>>>>> royale-asjs
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>> well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ‹peter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
> >>> and
> >>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
> >>>>>>> Does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
> >>>>>>> repo? A
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> u
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> es
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> >>>>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> %
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 26
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> >>>>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> e
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> l%
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> >>>>>>>>> 76d8%7
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> C
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> fa
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> >>>>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> h
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> %2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >>>>>> skype: zarzycki10
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LinkedIn:
> >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
> >>>>>> d
> >>>>>>
> >>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> >>> c2c1
> >>>>>> %
> >>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
> >>>>>> Y
> >>>>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
> >>>>>> e
> >>>>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
> >>>>>> d
> >>>>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
> >>>>>> 7
> >>>>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
> >>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> GitHub:
> >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>>>>> o
> >>>>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> >>> c2c1%7C
> >>>>>> f
> >>>>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
> >>> 9yybfI
> >>>>>> 1
> >>>>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e. royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>) using CNAME entries:
https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/>
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization
> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have
> several code repos.
>
> The repo is:
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs
>
> When you push it becomes available here:
>
> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
>
> Of course, I could be wrong...
> -Alex
>
> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This should make things simpler:
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
>> 26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D&rese
>> rved=0
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
>>>
>>> Get Outlook for
>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b
>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&sdata=0KYVTdYNd
>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>>>
>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>>>
>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
>>> content?
>>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
>>> Pages.
>>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>>>>>> started
>>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
>>> where
>>> in
>>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
>>> into
>>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>>>>> o
>>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>
>>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> royale-docs is good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>>>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I prefer royale-docs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>> to.
>>>>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>>>>>>> whatever
>>>>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
>>> 'master'
>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>>>>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
>>> have
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>>>>>>> non-ASDoc
>>>>>>>>> user documentation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
>>> per
>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>> Project.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
>>> Combining
>>>>>>> repos
>>>>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples
>>> in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>>>>>>> schedule.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
>>> (i.e.
>>>>>>> Github
>>>>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
>>> tourjs
>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>>>>>>> how to
>>>>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
>>> components.
>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>>>>>>> royale-asjs
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ‹peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
>>> and
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>>>>>>> Does
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>>>>>>> repo? A
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>>>>>>>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>>>>>>>> es
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>>>>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>>>>>>>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>>>>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>>>>>>> l%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>>>>>>>>> 76d8%7
>>>>>>>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>>>>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
>>>>>>>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>>>>>>>> %2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LinkedIn:
>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>>>>>> d
>>>>>>
>>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>>> c2c1
>>>>>> %
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>>>>>> Y
>>>>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>>>>>> e
>>>>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>>>>>> d
>>>>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>>>>>> 7
>>>>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
>>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GitHub:
>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>>>>> o
>>>>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>>> c2c1%7C
>>>>>> f
>>>>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
>>> 9yybfI
>>>>>> 1
>>>>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an organization
and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have
several code repos.
The repo is:
https://github.com/apache/royale-docs
When you push it becomes available here:
https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
Of course, I could be wrong...
-Alex
On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
<omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>This should make things simpler:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
>61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
>26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D&rese
>rved=0
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
>>
>> Get Outlook for
>>Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b
>>1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&sdata=0KYVTdYNd
>>hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>>
>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>>
>> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
>>content?
>> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
>>Pages.
>> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >
>> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>> >>
>> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Alex,
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>> >>> started
>> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
>>where
>> in
>> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
>> into
>> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>> >>>
>> >>> [1]
>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>> >>> o
>> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>> >>> 2
>> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>> >>> 2
>> >>>
>>6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Piotr
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>>> royale-docs is good.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>> >>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>> Om
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>> >>>> point
>> >>>> to.
>> >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>> >>>> whatever
>> >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
>>'master'
>> >>>> branch
>> >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>> >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
>>have
>> >>>> some
>> >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>> >>>> non-ASDoc
>> >>>>>> user documentation.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thoughts?
>> >>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
>>per
>> >>>> Apache
>> >>>>>>> Project.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
>>Combining
>> >>>> repos
>> >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples
>>in
>> >>>> the
>> >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>> >>>> schedule.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>> >>>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
>>(i.e.
>> >>>> Github
>> >>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
>>tourjs
>> >>>> in a
>> >>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>> >>>> how to
>> >>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
>>components.
>> >>>> They
>> >>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Harbs
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>> >>>> royale-asjs
>> >>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>> >>>> would
>> >>>>>>>>> work
>> >>>>>>>>> well.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ‹peter
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
>>and
>> >>>> they
>> >>>>>>>>>> want
>> >>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>> >>>> Does
>> >>>>>>>>>> anyone
>> >>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>> >>>> repo? A
>> >>>>>>>>>> wiki
>> >>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>> >>>>>>>>>> u
>> >>>>>>>>>> es
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>> >>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>> >>>>>>>>>> %
>> >>>>>>>>>> 26
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>> >>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>> >>>>>>>>>> e
>> >>>>>>>>>> l%
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>> >>>>>> 76d8%7
>> >>>>>>>>>> C
>> >>>>>>>>>> fa
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>> >>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
>> >>>>>>>>>> h
>> >>>>>>>>>> %2
>> >>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>>
>> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>> >>> skype: zarzycki10
>> >>>
>> >>> LinkedIn:
>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>> >>> d
>> >>>
>>in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>> c2c1
>> >>> %
>> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>> >>> Y
>> >>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>> >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>> >>> e
>> >>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>> >>> d
>> >>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>> >>> 7
>> >>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>> >>>
>> >>> GitHub:
>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>> >>> o
>> >>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>> c2c1%7C
>> >>> f
>> >>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
>> 9yybfI
>> >>> 1
>> >>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Hmm, can you try doing a reply-all to the moderation email? That should
fix this issue.
If that doesnt work, I can switch.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> Om, this email is ending up in moderation. Can you subscribe this email
> or switch to one that is subscribed?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >This should make things simpler:
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
> >m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=
> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
> >61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
> >26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl
> VQ%3D&rese
> >rved=0
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
> >>
> >> Get Outlook for
> >>Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.
> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> >>aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9
> 2538%7Cfa7b
> >>1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&
> sdata=0KYVTdYNd
> >>hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
> >> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
> >>
> >> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
> >>
> >> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
> >>content?
> >> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
> >>Pages.
> >> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > -Alex
> >> >
> >> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi Alex,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
> >> >>> started
> >> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
> >>where
> >> in
> >> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
> >> into
> >> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [1]
> >> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >> >>> o
> >> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
> >> >>> 2
> >> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
> >> >>> 2
> >> >>>
> >>6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> Piotr
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> royale-docs is good.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >> >>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>> Om
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
> >> >>>> point
> >> >>>> to.
> >> >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
> >> >>>> whatever
> >> >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
> >>'master'
> >> >>>> branch
> >> >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> >> >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
> >>have
> >> >>>> some
> >> >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
> >> >>>> non-ASDoc
> >> >>>>>> user documentation.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Thoughts?
> >> >>>>>> -Alex
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
> >>per
> >> >>>> Apache
> >> >>>>>>> Project.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
> >>Combining
> >> >>>> repos
> >> >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples
> >>in
> >> >>>> the
> >> >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
> >> >>>> schedule.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> >> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
> >>(i.e.
> >> >>>> Github
> >> >>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
> >>tourjs
> >> >>>> in a
> >> >>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
> >> >>>> how to
> >> >>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
> >>components.
> >> >>>> They
> >> >>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Harbs
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pent@adobe.com.INVALID
> >
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
> >> >>>> royale-asjs
> >> >>>> and
> >> >>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
> >> >>>> would
> >> >>>>>>>>> work
> >> >>>>>>>>> well.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> ‹peter
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
> >>and
> >> >>>> they
> >> >>>>>>>>>> want
> >> >>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
> >> >>>> Does
> >> >>>>>>>>>> anyone
> >> >>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
> >> >>>> repo? A
> >> >>>>>>>>>> wiki
> >> >>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> >>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >> >>>>>>>>>> u
> >> >>>>>>>>>> es
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> >> >>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >> >>>>>>>>>> %
> >> >>>>>>>>>> 26
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> >> >>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >> >>>>>>>>>> e
> >> >>>>>>>>>> l%
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> >> >>>>>> 76d8%7
> >> >>>>>>>>>> C
> >> >>>>>>>>>> fa
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> >> >>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
> >> >>>>>>>>>> h
> >> >>>>>>>>>> %2
> >> >>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >>>
> >> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >> >>> skype: zarzycki10
> >> >>>
> >> >>> LinkedIn:
> >> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
> >> >>> d
> >> >>>
> >>in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> >> c2c1
> >> >>> %
> >> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
> >> >>> Y
> >> >>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
> >> >>> e
> >> >>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
> >> >>> d
> >> >>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
> >> >>> 7
> >> >>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
> >> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> GitHub:
> >> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >> >>> o
> >> >>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> >> c2c1%7C
> >> >>> f
> >> >>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
> >> 9yybfI
> >> >>> 1
> >> >>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Om, this email is ending up in moderation. Can you subscribe this email
or switch to one that is subscribed?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
<omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>This should make things simpler:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
>61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
>26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D&rese
>rved=0
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
>>
>> Get Outlook for
>>Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b
>>1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&sdata=0KYVTdYNd
>>hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>>
>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>>
>> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial
>>content?
>> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
>>Pages.
>> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >
>> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>> >>
>> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Alex,
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>> >>> started
>> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
>>where
>> in
>> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
>> into
>> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>> >>>
>> >>> [1]
>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>> >>> o
>> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>> >>> 2
>> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>> >>> 2
>> >>>
>>6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Piotr
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>>> royale-docs is good.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>> >>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>> Om
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>> >>>> point
>> >>>> to.
>> >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>> >>>> whatever
>> >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
>>'master'
>> >>>> branch
>> >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>> >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should
>>have
>> >>>> some
>> >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>> >>>> non-ASDoc
>> >>>>>> user documentation.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thoughts?
>> >>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
>>per
>> >>>> Apache
>> >>>>>>> Project.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
>>Combining
>> >>>> repos
>> >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples
>>in
>> >>>> the
>> >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>> >>>> schedule.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>> >>>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
>>(i.e.
>> >>>> Github
>> >>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
>>tourjs
>> >>>> in a
>> >>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>> >>>> how to
>> >>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
>>components.
>> >>>> They
>> >>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Harbs
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>> >>>> royale-asjs
>> >>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>> >>>> would
>> >>>>>>>>> work
>> >>>>>>>>> well.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ‹peter
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
>>and
>> >>>> they
>> >>>>>>>>>> want
>> >>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>> >>>> Does
>> >>>>>>>>>> anyone
>> >>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>> >>>> repo? A
>> >>>>>>>>>> wiki
>> >>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>> >>>>>>>>>> u
>> >>>>>>>>>> es
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>> >>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>> >>>>>>>>>> %
>> >>>>>>>>>> 26
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>> >>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>> >>>>>>>>>> e
>> >>>>>>>>>> l%
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>> >>>>>> 76d8%7
>> >>>>>>>>>> C
>> >>>>>>>>>> fa
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>> >>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
>> >>>>>>>>>> h
>> >>>>>>>>>> %2
>> >>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>>
>> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>> >>> skype: zarzycki10
>> >>>
>> >>> LinkedIn:
>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>> >>> d
>> >>>
>>in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>> c2c1
>> >>> %
>> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>> >>> Y
>> >>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>> >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>> >>> e
>> >>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>> >>> d
>> >>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>> >>> 7
>> >>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>> >>>
>> >>> GitHub:
>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>> >>> o
>> >>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
>> c2c1%7C
>> >>> f
>> >>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
>> 9yybfI
>> >>> 1
>> >>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
This should make things simpler:
https://github.com/blog/2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
>
> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>
> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>
> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content?
> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages.
> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
> >>
> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Alex,
> >>>
> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
> >>> started
> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where
> in
> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
> into
> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>> o
> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
> >>> 2
> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
> >>> 2
> >>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> royale-docs is good.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Om
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
> >>>> point
> >>>> to.
> >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
> >>>> whatever
> >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master'
> >>>> branch
> >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have
> >>>> some
> >>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
> >>>> non-ASDoc
> >>>>>> user documentation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per
> >>>> Apache
> >>>>>>> Project.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining
> >>>> repos
> >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
> >>>> schedule.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e.
> >>>> Github
> >>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs
> >>>> in a
> >>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
> >>>> how to
> >>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components.
> >>>> They
> >>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
> >>>> royale-asjs
> >>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
> >>>> would
> >>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>> well.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ‹peter
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and
> >>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
> >>>> Does
> >>>>>>>>>> anyone
> >>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
> >>>> repo? A
> >>>>>>>>>> wiki
> >>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >>>>>>>>>> u
> >>>>>>>>>> es
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> >>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >>>>>>>>>> %
> >>>>>>>>>> 26
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> >>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >>>>>>>>>> e
> >>>>>>>>>> l%
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> >>>>>> 76d8%7
> >>>>>>>>>> C
> >>>>>>>>>> fa
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> >>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
> >>>>>>>>>> h
> >>>>>>>>>> %2
> >>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>
> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >>> skype: zarzycki10
> >>>
> >>> LinkedIn:
> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
> >>> d
> >>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> c2c1
> >>> %
> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
> >>> Y
> >>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
> >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
> >>> e
> >>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
> >>> d
> >>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
> >>> 7
> >>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>
> >>> GitHub:
> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>> o
> >>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> c2c1%7C
> >>> f
> >>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
> 9yybfI
> >>> 1
> >>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions.
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
________________________________
From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content?
> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages.
> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>>
>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>>> started
>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in
>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into
>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>>>
>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>> o
>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>>> 2
>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>>> 2
>>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> royale-docs is good.
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I prefer royale-docs
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Om
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>>>> point
>>>> to.
>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>>>> whatever
>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master'
>>>> branch
>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have
>>>> some
>>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>>>> non-ASDoc
>>>>>> user documentation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per
>>>> Apache
>>>>>>> Project.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining
>>>> repos
>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in
>>>> the
>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>>>> schedule.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e.
>>>> Github
>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs
>>>> in a
>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>>>> how to
>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components.
>>>> They
>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>>>> royale-asjs
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ‹peter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and
>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>>>> Does
>>>>>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>>>> repo? A
>>>>>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>>>>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>>>>> es
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>>>>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>>>> 26
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>>>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>>>> l%
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>>>>>> 76d8%7
>>>>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>>>>> fa
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
>>>>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>>>>> %2
>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>
>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>
>>> LinkedIn:
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>>> d
>>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35c2c1
>>> %
>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>>> Y
>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>>> e
>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>>> d
>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>>> 7
>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButxmx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>> GitHub:
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>> o
>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35c2c1%7C
>>> f
>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=9yybfI
>>> 1
>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>>
>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content?
> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages.
> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>>
>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>>> started
>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in
>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into
>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>>>
>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>> o
>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>>> 2
>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>>> 2
>>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> royale-docs is good.
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>> <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I prefer royale-docs
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Om
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>>>> point
>>>> to.
>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>>>> whatever
>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master'
>>>> branch
>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have
>>>> some
>>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>>>> non-ASDoc
>>>>>> user documentation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per
>>>> Apache
>>>>>>> Project.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining
>>>> repos
>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in
>>>> the
>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>>>> schedule.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e.
>>>> Github
>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs
>>>> in a
>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>>>> how to
>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components.
>>>> They
>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>>>> royale-asjs
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ‹peter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and
>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>>>> Does
>>>>>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>>>> repo? A
>>>>>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>>>>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>>>>> es
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>>>>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>>>> 26
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>>>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>>>> l%
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>>>>>> 76d8%7
>>>>>>>>>> C
>>>>>>>>>> fa
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
>>>>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>>>>> %2
>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>
>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>
>>> LinkedIn:
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>>> d
>>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35c2c1
>>> %
>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>>> Y
>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>>> e
>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>>> d
>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>>> 7
>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButxmx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>> GitHub:
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>> o
>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35c2c1%7C
>>> f
>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=9yybfI
>>> 1
>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>>
>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content?
I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages.
Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
>
>On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi Alex,
>>
>>+1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>>started
>>and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in
>>your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into
>>royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>>
>>Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>>
>>[1]
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>o
>>m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>>2
>>b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>>2
>>6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Piotr
>>
>>
>>2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> royale-docs is good.
>>>
>>> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>>><bi...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I prefer royale-docs
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Om
>>> >
>>> > On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>>>point
>>> to.
>>> >> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>>> whatever
>>> >> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master'
>>> branch
>>> >> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>>> >> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>>> >>
>>> >> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have
>>>some
>>> >> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>>>non-ASDoc
>>> >> user documentation.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thoughts?
>>> >> -Alex
>>> >>
>>> >> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per
>>> Apache
>>> >>> Project.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining
>>> repos
>>> >>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in
>>>the
>>> >>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>>> schedule.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> My 2 cents,
>>> >>> -Alex
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e.
>>> Github
>>> >>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs
>>>in a
>>> >>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>>>how to
>>> >>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components.
>>>They
>>> >>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Harbs
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>>>royale-asjs
>>> and
>>> >>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>>>would
>>> >>>>> work
>>> >>>>> well.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> ‹peter
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and
>>>they
>>> >>>>>> want
>>> >>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>>>Does
>>> >>>>>> anyone
>>> >>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>>>repo? A
>>> >>>>>> wiki
>>> >>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>>>> Harbs
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>>> >>>>>> u
>>> >>>>>> es
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>>> >> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>>> >>>>>> %
>>> >>>>>> 26
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>>> >> 3Acomment-tabpan
>>> >>>>>> e
>>> >>>>>> l%
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>>23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>>> >> 76d8%7
>>> >>>>>> C
>>> >>>>>> fa
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>>> >> sdata=%2FSB
>>> >>>>>> h
>>> >>>>>> %2
>>> >>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>>mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>skype: zarzycki10
>>
>>LinkedIn:
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>>d
>>in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35c2c1
>>%
>>7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
>>Y
>>zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>>e
>>din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
>>d
>>2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
>>7
>>26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButxmx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>>GitHub:
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>o
>>m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35c2c1%7C
>>f
>>a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=9yybfI
>>1
>>8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>+1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
>started
>and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in
>your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into
>royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>
>Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>
>[1]
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2
>b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63642614837572
>6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
>
>Thanks,
>Piotr
>
>
>2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
>> royale-docs is good.
>>
>> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I prefer royale-docs
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Om
>> >
>> > On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>wrote:
>> >
>> >> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
>>point
>> to.
>> >> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
>> whatever
>> >> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master'
>> branch
>> >> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>> >> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>> >>
>> >> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have
>>some
>> >> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
>>non-ASDoc
>> >> user documentation.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts?
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per
>> Apache
>> >>> Project.
>> >>>
>> >>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining
>> repos
>> >>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in
>>the
>> >>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
>> schedule.
>> >>>
>> >>> My 2 cents,
>> >>> -Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e.
>> Github
>> >>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs
>>in a
>> >>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
>>how to
>> >>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components.
>>They
>> >>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Harbs
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
>>royale-asjs
>> and
>> >>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
>>would
>> >>>>> work
>> >>>>> well.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ‹peter
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and
>>they
>> >>>>>> want
>> >>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
>>Does
>> >>>>>> anyone
>> >>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
>>repo? A
>> >>>>>> wiki
>> >>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>> Harbs
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>> >>>>>> u
>> >>>>>> es
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>> >> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>> >>>>>> %
>> >>>>>> 26
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>> >> 3Acomment-tabpan
>> >>>>>> e
>> >>>>>> l%
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>> >> 76d8%7
>> >>>>>> C
>> >>>>>> fa
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>> >> sdata=%2FSB
>> >>>>>> h
>> >>>>>> %2
>> >>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>mobile: +48 880 859 557
>skype: zarzycki10
>
>LinkedIn:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linked
>in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35c2c1%
>7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=9IuY
>zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.linke
>din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
>2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
>26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButxmx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>GitHub:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
>m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cf
>a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=9yybfI1
>8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Hi,
I started work on a Quick Start guide [1] to bridge the gap between the
README (source setup and build) and any in-depth documentation.
It will simply be the steps I took to get a project compiling on my
machine. I had to gather the information from various places and I thought
it'd be nice if other newbies like me didn't have to dig as deep, but could
set up and execute their local dev installation in a reasonable amount of
time.
EdB
1: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] started
> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in
> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into
> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
>
> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
>
> [1] https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
> > royale-docs is good.
> >
> > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I prefer royale-docs
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> > > On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point
> > to.
> > >> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
> > whatever
> > >> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master'
> > branch
> > >> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> > >> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
> > >>
> > >> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have
> some
> > >> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our
> non-ASDoc
> > >> user documentation.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per
> > Apache
> > >>> Project.
> > >>>
> > >>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining
> > repos
> > >>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in
> the
> > >>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
> > schedule.
> > >>>
> > >>> My 2 cents,
> > >>> -Alex
> > >>>
> > >>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e.
> > Github
> > >>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs
> in a
> > >>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how
> to
> > >>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components.
> They
> > >>>> seem separate and complimentary.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Harbs
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs
> > and
> > >>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
> would
> > >>>>> work
> > >>>>> well.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ‹peter
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and
> they
> > >>>>>> want
> > >>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does
> > >>>>>> anyone
> > >>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo?
> A
> > >>>>>> wiki
> > >>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Harbs
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > >> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> > >>>>>> u
> > >>>>>> es
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> > >> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> > >>>>>> %
> > >>>>>> 26
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> > >> 3Acomment-tabpan
> > >>>>>> e
> > >>>>>> l%
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> > >> 76d8%7
> > >>>>>> C
> > >>>>>> fa
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> > >> sdata=%2FSB
> > >>>>>> h
> > >>>>>> %2
> > >>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> skype: zarzycki10
>
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>
> GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alex,
+1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1] started
and move all his already gathered information in that structure where in
your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or into
royale-asjs as Wiki ?
Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
[1] https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki
Thanks,
Piotr
2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> royale-docs is good.
>
> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I prefer royale-docs
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point
> to.
> >> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
> whatever
> >> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master'
> branch
> >> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> >> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
> >>
> >> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have some
> >> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our non-ASDoc
> >> user documentation.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per
> Apache
> >>> Project.
> >>>
> >>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining
> repos
> >>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in the
> >>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release
> schedule.
> >>>
> >>> My 2 cents,
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e.
> Github
> >>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a
> >>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to
> >>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They
> >>>> seem separate and complimentary.
> >>>>
> >>>> Harbs
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs
> and
> >>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would
> >>>>> work
> >>>>> well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ‹peter
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they
> >>>>>> want
> >>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does
> >>>>>> anyone
> >>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A
> >>>>>> wiki
> >>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >>>>>> u
> >>>>>> es
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> >> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >>>>>> %
> >>>>>> 26
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> >> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >>>>>> e
> >>>>>> l%
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> >> 76d8%7
> >>>>>> C
> >>>>>> fa
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> >> sdata=%2FSB
> >>>>>> h
> >>>>>> %2
> >>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
royale-docs is good.
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I prefer royale-docs
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point to.
>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or whatever
>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' branch
>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>>
>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have some
>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our non-ASDoc
>> user documentation.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per Apache
>>> Project.
>>>
>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining repos
>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in the
>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release schedule.
>>>
>>> My 2 cents,
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. Github
>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a
>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to
>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They
>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
>>>>
>>>> Harbs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs and
>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would
>>>>> work
>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
>>>>>
>>>>> ‹peter
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they
>>>>>> want
>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does
>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A
>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
>>>>>> u
>>>>>> es
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
>>>>>> %
>>>>>> 26
>>>>>>
>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
>> 3Acomment-tabpan
>>>>>> e
>>>>>> l%
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
>> 76d8%7
>>>>>> C
>>>>>> fa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
>> sdata=%2FSB
>>>>>> h
>>>>>> %2
>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I prefer royale-docs
Thanks,
Om
On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point to.
> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or whatever
> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' branch
> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>
> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should have some
> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our non-ASDoc
> user documentation.
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> >I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per Apache
> >Project.
> >
> >It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining repos
> >for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in the
> >IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release schedule.
> >
> >My 2 cents,
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. Github
> >>Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a
> >>way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to
> >>use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They
> >>seem separate and complimentary.
> >>
> >>Harbs
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs and
> >>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would
> >>>work
> >>> well.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >>>
> >>> ‹peter
> >>>
> >>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they
> >>>>want
> >>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >>>>
> >>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >>>>
> >>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does
> >>>>anyone
> >>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >>>>
> >>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A
> >>>>wiki
> >>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Harbs
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >>>>u
> >>>>es
> >>>>
> >>>>.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >>>>%
> >>>>26
> >>>>
> >>>>page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >>>>e
> >>>>l%
> >>>>
> >>>>23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> 76d8%7
> >>>>C
> >>>>fa
> >>>>
> >>>>7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> sdata=%2FSB
> >>>>h
> >>>>%2
> >>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>