You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/03/02 14:54:41 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26939] -
[PATCH] SmartDateFormat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26939>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26939
[PATCH] SmartDateFormat
otis@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From otis@apache.org 2004-03-02 13:54 -------
A simple test case would be nice.
Also, it looks like the existing unit tests for QueryParser fail after this
QueryParser patch is applied:
[junit] Testcase:
testDateRange(org.apache.lucene.queryParser.TestQueryParser): FAILED
[junit] Query /[ 2/1/02 TO 2/4/02]/ yielded /[2/1/02 TO 2/4/02]/, expecting
/[0cx572ow0 TO 0cx9he8w0]/
[junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Query /[ 2/1/02 TO 2/4/02]/
yielded /[2/1/02 TO 2/4/02]/, expecting /[0cx572ow0 TO 0cx9he8w0]/
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.TestQueryParser.assertQueryEquals(TestQueryParser.java:162)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.TestQueryParser.testDateRange(TestQueryParser.java:350)
[junit] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
[junit] at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
[junit] at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
[junit] TEST org.apache.lucene.queryParser.TestQueryParser FAILED
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org