You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by Jochen Kemnade <jo...@eddyson.de> on 2016/02/02 12:31:02 UTC
Re: 5.5 anyone?
> I'm +1 with 5.4 being maintained for jre 1.6 or 1.7 and Tapestry 5.5 being
> for jre 1.8 users
Of course, that means that someone will need to maintain it. I'm not
overly confident that we are going to be able to maintain two release
branches.
So, what do we do now? Do we need a vote?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: 5.5 anyone?
Posted by Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <th...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:46:47 -0300, Jochen Kemnade <ke...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Sure, just go ahead. It doesn't look as if we're going to need another
> 5.4.x anyway.
Considering 5.5 will require Java 8, I'm planning to backport to 5.4 as
much as possible from 5.5.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: 5.5 anyone?
Posted by Jochen Kemnade <ke...@gmail.com>.
Sure, just go ahead. It doesn't look as if we're going to need another
5.4.x anyway.
Jochen
Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 13. Apr. 2016,
06:40:
> Hey Jochen, I see we might not be fully done with the 5.4.1 release yet but
> would it be ok to branch out 5.4.x? Looks like I got some free time in my
> hands in the coming weeks so I can set up 5.5 for the master and start the
> work on migrating jpa-transactions.
>
> Kalle
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
> thiagohp@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:12:30 -0300, Kalle Korhonen <
> > kalle.o.korhonen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Now that 5.4.1 is out, it might be a good time to move ahead with this
> >> plan, create a branch for 5.4.x and reserve the master for 5.5
> development
> >> with Java 8. I'm much more concerned with degradation of the test suite
> >> (since the tests aren't being run until we can upgrade Selenium) than
> >> merging/backporting everything from 5.5 to 5.4.
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> >> Kalle
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd say just proceed. I don't think a vote is required, especially since
> >>> there has been more than a month of discussion and no real objections.
> >>> On Feb 2, 2016 6:31 AM, "Jochen Kemnade" <jo...@eddyson.de>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I'm +1 with 5.4 being maintained for jre 1.6 or 1.7 and Tapestry 5.5
> >>> being
> >>> >> for jre 1.8 users
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > Of course, that means that someone will need to maintain it. I'm not
> >>> > overly confident that we are going to be able to maintain two release
> >>> > branches.
> >>> >
> >>> > So, what do we do now? Do we need a vote?
> >>> >
> >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > --
> > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> > Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
> > http://machina.com.br
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: 5.5 anyone?
Posted by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hey Jochen, I see we might not be fully done with the 5.4.1 release yet but
would it be ok to branch out 5.4.x? Looks like I got some free time in my
hands in the coming weeks so I can set up 5.5 for the master and start the
work on migrating jpa-transactions.
Kalle
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiagohp@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:12:30 -0300, Kalle Korhonen <
> kalle.o.korhonen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Now that 5.4.1 is out, it might be a good time to move ahead with this
>> plan, create a branch for 5.4.x and reserve the master for 5.5 development
>> with Java 8. I'm much more concerned with degradation of the test suite
>> (since the tests aren't being run until we can upgrade Selenium) than
>> merging/backporting everything from 5.5 to 5.4.
>>
>
> +1
>
>
>> Kalle
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'd say just proceed. I don't think a vote is required, especially since
>>> there has been more than a month of discussion and no real objections.
>>> On Feb 2, 2016 6:31 AM, "Jochen Kemnade" <jo...@eddyson.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm +1 with 5.4 being maintained for jre 1.6 or 1.7 and Tapestry 5.5
>>> being
>>> >> for jre 1.8 users
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Of course, that means that someone will need to maintain it. I'm not
>>> > overly confident that we are going to be able to maintain two release
>>> > branches.
>>> >
>>> > So, what do we do now? Do we need a vote?
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
> http://machina.com.br
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
Re: 5.5 anyone?
Posted by Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <th...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:12:30 -0300, Kalle Korhonen
<ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that 5.4.1 is out, it might be a good time to move ahead with this
> plan, create a branch for 5.4.x and reserve the master for 5.5
> development
> with Java 8. I'm much more concerned with degradation of the test suite
> (since the tests aren't being run until we can upgrade Selenium) than
> merging/backporting everything from 5.5 to 5.4.
+1
>
> Kalle
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd say just proceed. I don't think a vote is required, especially since
>> there has been more than a month of discussion and no real objections.
>> On Feb 2, 2016 6:31 AM, "Jochen Kemnade" <jo...@eddyson.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm +1 with 5.4 being maintained for jre 1.6 or 1.7 and Tapestry 5.5
>> being
>> >> for jre 1.8 users
>> >>
>> >
>> > Of course, that means that someone will need to maintain it. I'm not
>> > overly confident that we are going to be able to maintain two release
>> > branches.
>> >
>> > So, what do we do now? Do we need a vote?
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: 5.5 anyone?
Posted by Kalle Korhonen <ka...@gmail.com>.
Now that 5.4.1 is out, it might be a good time to move ahead with this
plan, create a branch for 5.4.x and reserve the master for 5.5 development
with Java 8. I'm much more concerned with degradation of the test suite
(since the tests aren't being run until we can upgrade Selenium) than
merging/backporting everything from 5.5 to 5.4.
Kalle
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd say just proceed. I don't think a vote is required, especially since
> there has been more than a month of discussion and no real objections.
> On Feb 2, 2016 6:31 AM, "Jochen Kemnade" <jo...@eddyson.de>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm +1 with 5.4 being maintained for jre 1.6 or 1.7 and Tapestry 5.5
> being
> >> for jre 1.8 users
> >>
> >
> > Of course, that means that someone will need to maintain it. I'm not
> > overly confident that we are going to be able to maintain two release
> > branches.
> >
> > So, what do we do now? Do we need a vote?
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: 5.5 anyone?
Posted by Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com>.
I'd say just proceed. I don't think a vote is required, especially since
there has been more than a month of discussion and no real objections.
On Feb 2, 2016 6:31 AM, "Jochen Kemnade" <jo...@eddyson.de> wrote:
> I'm +1 with 5.4 being maintained for jre 1.6 or 1.7 and Tapestry 5.5 being
>> for jre 1.8 users
>>
>
> Of course, that means that someone will need to maintain it. I'm not
> overly confident that we are going to be able to maintain two release
> branches.
>
> So, what do we do now? Do we need a vote?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>