You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2013/02/05 15:47:54 UTC
License.txt in the Examples project?
The Examples project has a License.txt file.
I'm not sure what the purpose is. Maybe the thinking is that it is required,
because there's some intent to "release" this somehow has an independent
distributable entity.
If it is required, then a notice file is too, I think.
======================
A more basic question: what is the plan for making the Examples projects
available for distribution?
I don't think it's proper to ask the general public to fetch things from SVN;
things that are part of releases have to go in one or both of the 2 release
spots: the Apache mirror system, and/or Maven Central for Maven artifacts.
-Marshall
On 2/1/2013 8:15 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the third release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-192/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3
>
>
> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
> textmarker-2.0.0:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/eclipse-update-site
>
>
> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
> They can also be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
>
>
> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>
> Documentation (pdf file):
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>
>
> Archive with all sources (also present in the staging repository):
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
Re: Suggestion to add a binary zip/tar distributable
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
On 05.02.2013 16:16, Marshall Schor wrote:
> I think there is no binary distribution zip/tar for textmarker? I think it
> might be wanted - for users who want to download the engine (which is a UIMA
> Annotator), the example project, and maybe some other things. This would let
> them assemble an application which included running TextMarker, without relying
> on Maven and/or Eclipse.
>
> We do this with most of our addons projects, as well as with our main uimaj,
> uima-as, uima-cpp components.
>
> There's a pre-configured build setup that the addons use, which you could
> probably reuse, and share much of the configuration for doing this already in
> the uima-wide parent-pom.
I will prepare something for the next RC.
Peter
> -Marshall
>
> On 2/5/2013 9:47 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> The Examples project has a License.txt file.
>>
>> I'm not sure what the purpose is. Maybe the thinking is that it is required,
>> because there's some intent to "release" this somehow has an independent
>> distributable entity.
>>
>> If it is required, then a notice file is too, I think.
>>
>> ======================
>>
>> A more basic question: what is the plan for making the Examples projects
>> available for distribution?
>>
>> I don't think it's proper to ask the general public to fetch things from SVN;
>> things that are part of releases have to go in one or both of the 2 release
>> spots: the Apache mirror system, and/or Maven Central for Maven artifacts.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 2/1/2013 8:15 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the third release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
>>> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-192/
>>>
>>> SVN tag:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3
>>>
>>>
>>> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
>>> textmarker-2.0.0:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/eclipse-update-site
>>>
>>>
>>> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
>>> They can also be found here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>>>
>>> Documentation (pdf file):
>>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>> Archive with all sources (also present in the staging repository):
>>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote on release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
Suggestion to add a binary zip/tar distributable
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I think there is no binary distribution zip/tar for textmarker? I think it
might be wanted - for users who want to download the engine (which is a UIMA
Annotator), the example project, and maybe some other things. This would let
them assemble an application which included running TextMarker, without relying
on Maven and/or Eclipse.
We do this with most of our addons projects, as well as with our main uimaj,
uima-as, uima-cpp components.
There's a pre-configured build setup that the addons use, which you could
probably reuse, and share much of the configuration for doing this already in
the uima-wide parent-pom.
-Marshall
On 2/5/2013 9:47 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> The Examples project has a License.txt file.
>
> I'm not sure what the purpose is. Maybe the thinking is that it is required,
> because there's some intent to "release" this somehow has an independent
> distributable entity.
>
> If it is required, then a notice file is too, I think.
>
> ======================
>
> A more basic question: what is the plan for making the Examples projects
> available for distribution?
>
> I don't think it's proper to ask the general public to fetch things from SVN;
> things that are part of releases have to go in one or both of the 2 release
> spots: the Apache mirror system, and/or Maven Central for Maven artifacts.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 2/1/2013 8:15 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the third release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
>> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-192/
>>
>> SVN tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3
>>
>>
>> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
>> textmarker-2.0.0:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/eclipse-update-site
>>
>>
>> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
>> They can also be found here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>
>>
>>
>> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>>
>> Documentation (pdf file):
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>>
>>
>> Archive with all sources (also present in the staging repository):
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>>
>>
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>