You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cassandra.apache.org by Israel Ekpo <is...@aicer.org> on 2013/03/24 04:45:38 UTC
Re: FLUME and Other TLPs Still in Incubator Status in JIRA
The following Infrastructure ticket has been opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6052
Thanks Hari for the tip
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan <hshreedharan@cloudera.com
> wrote:
> Hi Israel,
>
> I believe you can just file a ticket with infra, and they can fix it. I
> have noticed it before, but I don't really think it matters that the jira
> is flagged that way - everything that matters was migrated long ago. But
> please go ahead and file a jira for infra, and they she be able to take
> care of it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
> --
> Hari Shreedharan
>
>
> On Saturday, March 23, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
>
> > I noticed that FLUME, CASSANDRA, OPENNLP and some other top level
> projects
> > that have graduated from incubation are still flagged with "Incubator"
> > status in JIRA.
> >
> > Is there any special process that needs to take place for them to be
> > converted to the same status as LUCENE, TIKA and THRIFT within JIRA?
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP
> >
> >
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa#10024
>
>
Re: FLUME and Other TLPs Still in Incubator Status in JIRA
Posted by Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org>.
Thanks for fixing this Israel!
Best,
Mike
On Mar 27, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Israel Ekpo <is...@aicer.org> wrote:
> I have some great news.
>
> This has been addressed.
>
> The following TLPs that were previously flagged as being in Incubator
> status within JIRA have been successfully updated to reflect their correct
> status
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6052 was closed a few hours ago.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Israel Ekpo <is...@aicer.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> The following Infrastructure ticket has been opened
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6052
>>
>> Thanks Hari for the tip
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan <
>> hshreedharan@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Israel,
>>>
>>> I believe you can just file a ticket with infra, and they can fix it. I
>>> have noticed it before, but I don't really think it matters that the jira
>>> is flagged that way - everything that matters was migrated long ago. But
>>> please go ahead and file a jira for infra, and they she be able to take
>>> care of it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, March 23, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
>>>
>>>> I noticed that FLUME, CASSANDRA, OPENNLP and some other top level
>>> projects
>>>> that have graduated from incubation are still flagged with "Incubator"
>>>> status in JIRA.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any special process that needs to take place for them to be
>>>> converted to the same status as LUCENE, TIKA and THRIFT within JIRA?
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa#10024
>>
Re: FLUME and Other TLPs Still in Incubator Status in JIRA
Posted by Israel Ekpo <is...@aicer.org>.
I have some great news.
This has been addressed.
The following TLPs that were previously flagged as being in Incubator
status within JIRA have been successfully updated to reflect their correct
status
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6052 was closed a few hours ago.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Israel Ekpo <is...@aicer.org> wrote:
>
> The following Infrastructure ticket has been opened
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6052
>
> Thanks Hari for the tip
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan <
> hshreedharan@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Israel,
>>
>> I believe you can just file a ticket with infra, and they can fix it. I
>> have noticed it before, but I don't really think it matters that the jira
>> is flagged that way - everything that matters was migrated long ago. But
>> please go ahead and file a jira for infra, and they she be able to take
>> care of it.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hari
>>
>> --
>> Hari Shreedharan
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, March 23, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
>>
>> > I noticed that FLUME, CASSANDRA, OPENNLP and some other top level
>> projects
>> > that have graduated from incubation are still flagged with "Incubator"
>> > status in JIRA.
>> >
>> > Is there any special process that needs to take place for them to be
>> > converted to the same status as LUCENE, TIKA and THRIFT within JIRA?
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa#10024
>>
>>
>
Re: FLUME and Other TLPs Still in Incubator Status in JIRA
Posted by Israel Ekpo <is...@aicer.org>.
I have some great news.
This has been addressed.
The following TLPs that were previously flagged as being in Incubator
status within JIRA have been successfully updated to reflect their correct
status
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6052 was closed a few hours ago.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Israel Ekpo <is...@aicer.org> wrote:
>
> The following Infrastructure ticket has been opened
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6052
>
> Thanks Hari for the tip
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan <
> hshreedharan@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Israel,
>>
>> I believe you can just file a ticket with infra, and they can fix it. I
>> have noticed it before, but I don't really think it matters that the jira
>> is flagged that way - everything that matters was migrated long ago. But
>> please go ahead and file a jira for infra, and they she be able to take
>> care of it.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hari
>>
>> --
>> Hari Shreedharan
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, March 23, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
>>
>> > I noticed that FLUME, CASSANDRA, OPENNLP and some other top level
>> projects
>> > that have graduated from incubation are still flagged with "Incubator"
>> > status in JIRA.
>> >
>> > Is there any special process that needs to take place for them to be
>> > converted to the same status as LUCENE, TIKA and THRIFT within JIRA?
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa#10024
>>
>>
>