You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by Rongtong Jin <ji...@mails.ucas.ac.cn> on 2020/03/05 13:17:45 UTC
[VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.7.0 RC1
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for 4.7.0 of Apache RocketMQ.
This release optimized synchronous replication and greatly improved synchronous replication performance. This release made some enhancements, such as exception handle of transaction check service, preventing the client from committing too frequently, etc. This release also fixed some issues about mqadmin tools, message id setting, etc.
The artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.7.0-rc1/
The staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1044
Git tag for the release:
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-4.7.0
Hash for the release tag:
8ef01a6c635f6972847c40d5540b1945180d7cbd
Release Notes:
https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.7.0/
The artifacts have been signed with Key :
D606079AF789227A1F39928A02C8C9527DDD1959, which can be found in the keys file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
Checklist for reference,
Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
Fill in the following:
[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
[] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[] The code can be built success in the source package.
[] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Thanks,
The Apache RocketMQ Team
Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.7.0 RC1
Posted by liqipeng <wl...@163.com>.
+1 binding
[ok] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[ok] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[ok] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[ok] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[ok] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[ok] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
[ok] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> 在 2020年3月5日，下午9:17，Rongtong Jin <ji...@mails.ucas.ac.cn> 写道：
>
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> [] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [] The code can be built success in the source package.
> [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.7.0 RC1
Posted by ShannonDing <di...@apache.org>.
+1,
check list:
[ OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[ OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[ OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[ OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[ OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[ OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
[ OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[ OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[ OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
On 03/9/2020 17:14，heng du<du...@apache.org> wrote：
+1, binding
verified:
Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
License and Notice are correct in source package.
License and Notice are correct in binary package.
All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
The code can be built success in the source package.
Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
Also verified:
master-slave replication with SYNC_MASTER model
Rongtong Jin <ji...@mails.ucas.ac.cn> 于2020年3月5日周四 下午9:18写道：
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for 4.7.0 of Apache RocketMQ.
This release optimized synchronous replication and greatly improved
synchronous replication performance. This release made some enhancements,
such as exception handle of transaction check service, preventing the
client from committing too frequently, etc. This release also fixed some
issues about mqadmin tools, message id setting, etc.
The artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.7.0-rc1/
The staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1044
Git tag for the release:
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-4.7.0
Hash for the release tag:
8ef01a6c635f6972847c40d5540b1945180d7cbd
Release Notes:
https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.7.0/
The artifacts have been signed with Key :
D606079AF789227A1F39928A02C8C9527DDD1959, which can be found in the keys
file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
Checklist for reference,
Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
Fill in the following:
[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
[] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[] The code can be built success in the source package.
[] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
votes are reached.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Thanks,
The Apache RocketMQ Team
Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.7.0 RC1
Posted by heng du <du...@apache.org>.
+1, binding
verified:
Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
License and Notice are correct in source package.
License and Notice are correct in binary package.
All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
The code can be built success in the source package.
Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
Also verified:
master-slave replication with SYNC_MASTER model
Rongtong Jin <ji...@mails.ucas.ac.cn> 于2020年3月5日周四 下午9:18写道：
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 4.7.0 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
> This release optimized synchronous replication and greatly improved
> synchronous replication performance. This release made some enhancements,
> such as exception handle of transaction check service, preventing the
> client from committing too frequently, etc. This release also fixed some
> issues about mqadmin tools, message id setting, etc.
>
> The artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.7.0-rc1/
>
> The staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1044
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-4.7.0
>
> Hash for the release tag:
> 8ef01a6c635f6972847c40d5540b1945180d7cbd
>
> Release Notes:
> https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.7.0/
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> D606079AF789227A1F39928A02C8C9527DDD1959, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Checklist for reference,
> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> Fill in the following:
>
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> [] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [] The code can be built success in the source package.
> [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team