You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2006/07/02 21:20:23 UTC
openejb m2 groupId
The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily
somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different names:
otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up m1 openejb
jars. I think the easiest way to do this is to give the m2 jars m2
style groupIds. To get this started I changed the m2 openejb build
to use org.openejb. If this is the wrong groupId let me know what is
more correct and I will change it.
thanks
david jencks
Re: [openejb-dev] openejb m2 groupId
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Okay, I will try to set it up in a few...
--jason
On Jul 2, 2006, at 2:43 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Go for it. You just need to add the root pom of openejb. Login,
> then click "Add Maven 2.0 Project" and use https://svn.codehaus.org/
> blah/blah/openejb2/pom.xml as the pom url.
>
> -David
>
> On Jul 2, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Can we get Ci to build and deploy artifacts from the openejb2 m2
>> build with these new groupId's so that the G m2 build can start
>> using them?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>> That's cool. That's what we're using in the 3 branch.
>>>
>>> On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>> The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily
>>>> somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different
>>>> names: otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up
>>>> m1 openejb jars. I think the easiest way to do this is to give
>>>> the m2 jars m2 style groupIds. To get this started I changed
>>>> the m2 openejb build to use org.openejb. If this is the wrong
>>>> groupId let me know what is more correct and I will change it.
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>>
>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [openejb-dev] openejb m2 groupId
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Looks like the scm configuration is whack, Continuum picks up bits like:
scm:cvs:pserver:anoncvs@cvs.openejb.org:/home/cvspublic:openejb/
openejb-core
I've added the project, manually edited the SCM urls and asked
Continuum to build them (pending a bunch of other stuff that is in
the queue before them though). Looks like GBuild Agent's build might
have wedged, its reporting that its been running for 1 d 15 h 43 min
6 sec, and that seems like a tad too long for a build to run.
--jason
On Jul 2, 2006, at 2:43 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Go for it. You just need to add the root pom of openejb. Login,
> then click "Add Maven 2.0 Project" and use https://svn.codehaus.org/
> blah/blah/openejb2/pom.xml as the pom url.
>
> -David
>
> On Jul 2, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Can we get Ci to build and deploy artifacts from the openejb2 m2
>> build with these new groupId's so that the G m2 build can start
>> using them?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>> That's cool. That's what we're using in the 3 branch.
>>>
>>> On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>> The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily
>>>> somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different
>>>> names: otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up
>>>> m1 openejb jars. I think the easiest way to do this is to give
>>>> the m2 jars m2 style groupIds. To get this started I changed
>>>> the m2 openejb build to use org.openejb. If this is the wrong
>>>> groupId let me know what is more correct and I will change it.
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>>
>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [openejb-dev] openejb m2 groupId
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Go for it. You just need to add the root pom of openejb. Login,
then click "Add Maven 2.0 Project" and use https://svn.codehaus.org/
blah/blah/openejb2/pom.xml as the pom url.
-David
On Jul 2, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Can we get Ci to build and deploy artifacts from the openejb2 m2
> build with these new groupId's so that the G m2 build can start
> using them?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> That's cool. That's what we're using in the 3 branch.
>>
>> On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily
>>> somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different
>>> names: otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up
>>> m1 openejb jars. I think the easiest way to do this is to give
>>> the m2 jars m2 style groupIds. To get this started I changed the
>>> m2 openejb build to use org.openejb. If this is the wrong
>>> groupId let me know what is more correct and I will change it.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>
>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>
>
Re: [openejb-dev] openejb m2 groupId
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Can we get Ci to build and deploy artifacts from the openejb2 m2
build with these new groupId's so that the G m2 build can start using
them?
--jason
On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> That's cool. That's what we're using in the 3 branch.
>
> On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily
>> somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different
>> names: otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up m1
>> openejb jars. I think the easiest way to do this is to give the
>> m2 jars m2 style groupIds. To get this started I changed the m2
>> openejb build to use org.openejb. If this is the wrong groupId
>> let me know what is more correct and I will change it.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>
>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>
Re: [openejb-dev] openejb m2 groupId
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
That's cool. That's what we're using in the 3 branch.
On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily
> somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different
> names: otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up m1
> openejb jars. I think the easiest way to do this is to give the m2
> jars m2 style groupIds. To get this started I changed the m2
> openejb build to use org.openejb. If this is the wrong groupId let
> me know what is more correct and I will change it.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
Re: [openejb-dev] openejb m2 groupId
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
David Jencks wrote:
> The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily
> somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different names:
> otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up m1 openejb
> jars. I think the easiest way to do this is to give the m2 jars m2
> style groupIds. To get this started I changed the m2 openejb build to
> use org.openejb. If this is the wrong groupId let me know what is
> more correct and I will change it.
Makes sense to me.
Regards,
Alan