You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shiro.apache.org by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org> on 2009/07/09 03:45:52 UTC
Maven snapshots requirements
Hi Mentors,
Now that the name is solidified, we should be able to start publishing Maven
snapshots asap. However, we haven't fully completed the IP clearance due
diligence. Are we allowed to start publishing Maven snapshots in the mean
time? I *think* this is possible, I just need confirmation.
Also, if possible, how do we ensure that Hudson can publish these snapshots
upon a successful build automatically?
Thanks,
Les
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Les Hazlewood <le...@hazlewood.com>.
Thanks Craig!
On Jul 10, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I forwarded them to Craig - Craig can you please repost? I've got
> to run at the moment.
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
> <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Please forward them to the list.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> The 'files' are emails from each individual member. I'll forward
> them to
> you now.
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Craig L Russell
> <Cr...@sun.com>wrote:
>
> Hi Les,
>
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> I've found the original thread where each member made these
> statements.
> Do
> we need to post it again (I did send this to Emmanuel in the past)?
>
>
> It would be good if the emails from all the original contributors were
> assembled and checked into svn so we don't have to go looking for
> them.
>
> There is a place in Apache svn where we can put them: documents/
> grants. If
> you tell me where the files are I can check them in. Then the STATUS
> file
> can refer to them and we're done.
>
> Craig
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> I'm fairly certain that Emmanuel already did that.
>
> The original codebase was LGPL. The only committers to that project
> all
> presented written statements (via email) that they fully agreed with
> and
> supported the move to the Apache 2.0 license. All committers did this
> prior
> to the project being accepted into the Incubator. Those same
> committers
> are
> now ASF committers and all of them have submitted their CLAs.
>
> Doesn't that cover it?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>
>
> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>
>
> How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all
> contributors.
> If not, how do we check?
>
>
>
> IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL 2.0
> compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS history
> of
> the original donation and make sure that every author has submitted
> the
> proper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>
>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
I forwarded them to Craig - Craig can you please repost? I've got to run at
the moment.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>wrote:
> Please forward them to the list.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> The 'files' are emails from each individual member. I'll forward them to
>> you now.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> Hi Les,
>>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>
>>> I've found the original thread where each member made these statements.
>>>
>>>> Do
>>>> we need to post it again (I did send this to Emmanuel in the past)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It would be good if the emails from all the original contributors were
>>> assembled and checked into svn so we don't have to go looking for them.
>>>
>>> There is a place in Apache svn where we can put them: documents/grants.
>>> If
>>> you tell me where the files are I can check them in. Then the STATUS file
>>> can refer to them and we're done.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm fairly certain that Emmanuel already did that.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The original codebase was LGPL. The only committers to that project
>>>>> all
>>>>> presented written statements (via email) that they fully agreed with
>>>>> and
>>>>> supported the move to the Apache 2.0 license. All committers did this
>>>>> prior
>>>>> to the project being accepted into the Incubator. Those same
>>>>> committers
>>>>> are
>>>>> now ASF committers and all of them have submitted their CLAs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't that cover it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all
>>>>>>> contributors.
>>>>>>> If not, how do we check?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL 2.0
>>>>>> compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS history
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the original donation and make sure that every author has submitted
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> proper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Please forward them to the list.
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> The 'files' are emails from each individual member. I'll forward
> them to
> you now.
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Craig L Russell
> <Cr...@sun.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Les,
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>
>> I've found the original thread where each member made these
>> statements.
>>> Do
>>> we need to post it again (I did send this to Emmanuel in the past)?
>>>
>>
>> It would be good if the emails from all the original contributors
>> were
>> assembled and checked into svn so we don't have to go looking for
>> them.
>>
>> There is a place in Apache svn where we can put them: documents/
>> grants. If
>> you tell me where the files are I can check them in. Then the
>> STATUS file
>> can refer to them and we're done.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Les Hazlewood
>>> <lh...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm fairly certain that Emmanuel already did that.
>>>>
>>>> The original codebase was LGPL. The only committers to that
>>>> project all
>>>> presented written statements (via email) that they fully agreed
>>>> with and
>>>> supported the move to the Apache 2.0 license. All committers did
>>>> this
>>>> prior
>>>> to the project being accepted into the Incubator. Those same
>>>> committers
>>>> are
>>>> now ASF committers and all of them have submitted their CLAs.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't that cover it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has
>>>>>> CLAs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all
>>>>>> contributors.
>>>>>> If not, how do we check?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL
>>>>> 2.0
>>>>> compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS
>>>>> history
>>>>> of
>>>>> the original donation and make sure that every author has
>>>>> submitted the
>>>>> proper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Alan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
The 'files' are emails from each individual member. I'll forward them to
you now.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com>wrote:
> Hi Les,
>
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> I've found the original thread where each member made these statements.
>> Do
>> we need to post it again (I did send this to Emmanuel in the past)?
>>
>
> It would be good if the emails from all the original contributors were
> assembled and checked into svn so we don't have to go looking for them.
>
> There is a place in Apache svn where we can put them: documents/grants. If
> you tell me where the files are I can check them in. Then the STATUS file
> can refer to them and we're done.
>
> Craig
>
>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm fairly certain that Emmanuel already did that.
>>>
>>> The original codebase was LGPL. The only committers to that project all
>>> presented written statements (via email) that they fully agreed with and
>>> supported the move to the Apache 2.0 license. All committers did this
>>> prior
>>> to the project being accepted into the Incubator. Those same committers
>>> are
>>> now ASF committers and all of them have submitted their CLAs.
>>>
>>> Doesn't that cover it?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all
>>>>> contributors.
>>>>> If not, how do we check?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL 2.0
>>>> compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS history
>>>> of
>>>> the original donation and make sure that every author has submitted the
>>>> proper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Les,
On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> I've found the original thread where each member made these
> statements. Do
> we need to post it again (I did send this to Emmanuel in the past)?
It would be good if the emails from all the original contributors were
assembled and checked into svn so we don't have to go looking for them.
There is a place in Apache svn where we can put them: documents/
grants. If you tell me where the files are I can check them in. Then
the STATUS file can refer to them and we're done.
Craig
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Les Hazlewood
> <lh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm fairly certain that Emmanuel already did that.
>>
>> The original codebase was LGPL. The only committers to that
>> project all
>> presented written statements (via email) that they fully agreed
>> with and
>> supported the move to the Apache 2.0 license. All committers did
>> this prior
>> to the project being accepted into the Incubator. Those same
>> committers are
>> now ASF committers and all of them have submitted their CLAs.
>>
>> Doesn't that cover it?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>>>
>>>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has
>>>> CLAs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all
>>>> contributors.
>>>> If not, how do we check?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL 2.0
>>> compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS
>>> history of
>>> the original donation and make sure that every author has
>>> submitted the
>>> proper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
I've found the original thread where each member made these statements. Do
we need to post it again (I did send this to Emmanuel in the past)?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm fairly certain that Emmanuel already did that.
>
> The original codebase was LGPL. The only committers to that project all
> presented written statements (via email) that they fully agreed with and
> supported the move to the Apache 2.0 license. All committers did this prior
> to the project being accepted into the Incubator. Those same committers are
> now ASF committers and all of them have submitted their CLAs.
>
> Doesn't that cover it?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>>
>>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>>>
>>>
>>> How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all
>>> contributors.
>>> If not, how do we check?
>>>
>>
>>
>> IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL 2.0
>> compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS history of
>> the original donation and make sure that every author has submitted the
>> proper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
I'm fairly certain that Emmanuel already did that.
The original codebase was LGPL. The only committers to that project all
presented written statements (via email) that they fully agreed with and
supported the move to the Apache 2.0 license. All committers did this prior
to the project being accepted into the Incubator. Those same committers are
now ASF committers and all of them have submitted their CLAs.
Doesn't that cover it?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>
>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>>
>>
>> How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all
>> contributors.
>> If not, how do we check?
>>
>
>
> IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL 2.0
> compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS history of
> the original donation and make sure that every author has submitted the
> proper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>
> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>
>
> How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all
> contributors.
> If not, how do we check?
IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL 2.0
compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS history
of the original donation and make sure that every author has submitted
the proper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be?
Regards,
Alan
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Brian Topping <to...@codehaus.org>.
Done, thanks. Brian
On Jul 9, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Yes please. As soon as possible.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Brian Topping wrote:
>
>> Sounds like I should take the snapshots down for now then?
>> Apologies, I forgot about incubation process.
>>
>> Cheers, Brian
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Craig L Russell
>> <Cr...@Sun.COM> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>>>
>>>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has
>>>> CLAs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do we go about doing this?
>>>
>>> Generally, you have to go through the code and figure out who
>>> wrote it and whether they have CLAs or software grants on file.
>>> Everyone with a CLA is listed here: http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
>>>
>>> If you can't find an author's CLA then you have to contact the
>>> author.
>>>
>>> If you can't find the author, you flag the file and rewrite it.
>>>
>>> This is the part that we need to do before we publish snapshots.
>>> We can't publish stuff that we don't have a license for.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>> I thought we had CLAs for all contributors.
>>>> If not, how do we check?
>>>>
>>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cool, there it is :) Thanks!
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>
>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Yes please. As soon as possible.
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Brian Topping wrote:
> Sounds like I should take the snapshots down for now then?
> Apologies, I forgot about incubation process.
>
> Cheers, Brian
>
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>>
>>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>>>
>>>
>>> How do we go about doing this?
>>
>> Generally, you have to go through the code and figure out who wrote
>> it and whether they have CLAs or software grants on file. Everyone
>> with a CLA is listed here: http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
>>
>> If you can't find an author's CLA then you have to contact the
>> author.
>>
>> If you can't find the author, you flag the file and rewrite it.
>>
>> This is the part that we need to do before we publish snapshots. We
>> can't publish stuff that we don't have a license for.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>> I thought we had CLAs for all contributors.
>>> If not, how do we check?
>>>
>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/
>>>
>>>
>>> Cool, there it is :) Thanks!
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Brian Topping <to...@codehaus.org>.
Sounds like I should take the snapshots down for now then? Apologies,
I forgot about incubation process.
Cheers, Brian
On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>
wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
>> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>
>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>>
>>
>> How do we go about doing this?
>
> Generally, you have to go through the code and figure out who wrote
> it and whether they have CLAs or software grants on file. Everyone
> with a CLA is listed here: http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
>
> If you can't find an author's CLA then you have to contact the author.
>
> If you can't find the author, you flag the file and rewrite it.
>
> This is the part that we need to do before we publish snapshots. We
> can't publish stuff that we don't have a license for.
>
> Craig
>
>> I thought we had CLAs for all contributors.
>> If not, how do we check?
>>
>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/
>>
>>
>> Cool, there it is :) Thanks!
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
>> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>>
>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>>
>>
>> How do we go about doing this?
>
> Generally, you have to go through the code and figure out who wrote
> it and whether they have CLAs or software grants on file. Everyone
> with a CLA is listed here: http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
>
> If you can't find an author's CLA then you have to contact the author.
>
> If you can't find the author, you flag the file and rewrite it.
>
> This is the part that we need to do before we publish snapshots. We
> can't publish stuff that we don't have a license for.
Am I correct in stating that we only have to do this if the code was
not originally written under an AL 2.0 compatible license?
Regards,
Alan
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
On Jul 8, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> Thanks for chiming in Alan,
>
> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
>
>
> How do we go about doing this?
Generally, you have to go through the code and figure out who wrote it
and whether they have CLAs or software grants on file. Everyone with a
CLA is listed here: http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
If you can't find an author's CLA then you have to contact the author.
If you can't find the author, you flag the file and rewrite it.
This is the part that we need to do before we publish snapshots. We
can't publish stuff that we don't have a license for.
Craig
> I thought we had CLAs for all contributors.
> If not, how do we check?
>
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/
>
>
> Cool, there it is :) Thanks!
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
Thanks for chiming in Alan,
IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all contributors.
If not, how do we check?
http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/
Cool, there it is :) Thanks!
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> I'm not sure. I'm assuming the only thing left is to guarantee that
> the
> Apache copyright is at the top of every file, and we've done a good
> deal of
> work to ensure this already (although there might be a file or two
> that
> slipped through the cracks). All contributor licenses have been
> received.
> The LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt and README.txt are at the root of the
> project,
> and contain the necessary notifications.
>
> Is there anything else?
Odd, I could have sworn there were a number of issues for incubation
but I don't see them in the Jira.
IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
> Also, wasn't there a tool developed (maven plugin, whatever) for use
> by
> incubating projects to ensure the build meets this criteria? I heard
> rumblings of this, but I don't know if came to fruition or not. If
> there
> isn't a tool for this, what is the easiest way to guarantee we've
> met IP
> clearance requriements?
http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/
Regards,
Alan
>
> - Les
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com
> >wrote:
>
>> Hi Les,
>>
>> I don't think there is an official policy, but:
>>
>> I would feel *much* better about publishing snapshots only after we
>> have
>> done due diligence on our IP.
>>
>> How much remains to be done?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mentors,
>>>
>>> Now that the name is solidified, we should be able to start
>>> publishing
>>> Maven
>>> snapshots asap. However, we haven't fully completed the IP
>>> clearance due
>>> diligence. Are we allowed to start publishing Maven snapshots in
>>> the mean
>>> time? I *think* this is possible, I just need confirmation.
>>>
>>> Also, if possible, how do we ensure that Hudson can publish these
>>> snapshots
>>> upon a successful build automatically?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Les
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Les,
The only issue I've got with publishing snapshots is whether we might
be publishing code that hasn't been licensed to Apache. The headers
are a formality.
The tool you are referring to is probably RAT. Check it out: http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
It will take you seven minutes to download and run it.
Craig
On Jul 8, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> I'm not sure. I'm assuming the only thing left is to guarantee that
> the
> Apache copyright is at the top of every file, and we've done a good
> deal of
> work to ensure this already (although there might be a file or two
> that
> slipped through the cracks). All contributor licenses have been
> received.
> The LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt and README.txt are at the root of the
> project,
> and contain the necessary notifications.
>
> Is there anything else?
>
> Also, wasn't there a tool developed (maven plugin, whatever) for use
> by
> incubating projects to ensure the build meets this criteria? I heard
> rumblings of this, but I don't know if came to fruition or not. If
> there
> isn't a tool for this, what is the easiest way to guarantee we've
> met IP
> clearance requriements?
>
> - Les
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com
> >wrote:
>
>> Hi Les,
>>
>> I don't think there is an official policy, but:
>>
>> I would feel *much* better about publishing snapshots only after we
>> have
>> done due diligence on our IP.
>>
>> How much remains to be done?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mentors,
>>>
>>> Now that the name is solidified, we should be able to start
>>> publishing
>>> Maven
>>> snapshots asap. However, we haven't fully completed the IP
>>> clearance due
>>> diligence. Are we allowed to start publishing Maven snapshots in
>>> the mean
>>> time? I *think* this is possible, I just need confirmation.
>>>
>>> Also, if possible, how do we ensure that Hudson can publish these
>>> snapshots
>>> upon a successful build automatically?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Les
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Les Hazlewood <lh...@apache.org>.
I'm not sure. I'm assuming the only thing left is to guarantee that the
Apache copyright is at the top of every file, and we've done a good deal of
work to ensure this already (although there might be a file or two that
slipped through the cracks). All contributor licenses have been received.
The LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt and README.txt are at the root of the project,
and contain the necessary notifications.
Is there anything else?
Also, wasn't there a tool developed (maven plugin, whatever) for use by
incubating projects to ensure the build meets this criteria? I heard
rumblings of this, but I don't know if came to fruition or not. If there
isn't a tool for this, what is the easiest way to guarantee we've met IP
clearance requriements?
- Les
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com>wrote:
> Hi Les,
>
> I don't think there is an official policy, but:
>
> I would feel *much* better about publishing snapshots only after we have
> done due diligence on our IP.
>
> How much remains to be done?
>
> Craig
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> Hi Mentors,
>>
>> Now that the name is solidified, we should be able to start publishing
>> Maven
>> snapshots asap. However, we haven't fully completed the IP clearance due
>> diligence. Are we allowed to start publishing Maven snapshots in the mean
>> time? I *think* this is possible, I just need confirmation.
>>
>> Also, if possible, how do we ensure that Hudson can publish these
>> snapshots
>> upon a successful build automatically?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Les
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
Re: Maven snapshots requirements
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Les,
I don't think there is an official policy, but:
I would feel *much* better about publishing snapshots only after we
have done due diligence on our IP.
How much remains to be done?
Craig
On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> Hi Mentors,
>
> Now that the name is solidified, we should be able to start
> publishing Maven
> snapshots asap. However, we haven't fully completed the IP
> clearance due
> diligence. Are we allowed to start publishing Maven snapshots in
> the mean
> time? I *think* this is possible, I just need confirmation.
>
> Also, if possible, how do we ensure that Hudson can publish these
> snapshots
> upon a successful build automatically?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Les
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!