You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by Daniel Dai <da...@gmail.com> on 2011/04/13 02:11:37 UTC
Review Request: New logical plan failing with ERROR 2229: Couldn't find
matching uid -1
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/587/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for pig and thejas.
Summary
-------
See PIG-1979
This addresses bug PIG-1979.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1979
Diffs
-----
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/branches/branch-0.8/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/expression/DereferenceExpression.java 1091122
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/branches/branch-0.8/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestEvalPipeline2.java 1091122
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/587/diff
Testing
-------
Test-patch:
[exec] +1 overall.
[exec]
[exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
[exec]
[exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
[exec]
[exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
[exec]
[exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
[exec]
[exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
[exec]
[exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
Unit-test:
all pass
Thanks,
Daniel
Re: Review Request: New logical plan failing with ERROR 2229: Couldn't find
matching uid -1
Posted by th...@yahoo.com.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/587/#review461
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
+1
- thejas
On 2011-04-13 00:11:37, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/587/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2011-04-13 00:11:37)
>
>
> Review request for pig and thejas.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> See PIG-1979
>
>
> This addresses bug PIG-1979.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1979
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/branches/branch-0.8/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/expression/DereferenceExpression.java 1091122
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/branches/branch-0.8/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestEvalPipeline2.java 1091122
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/587/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Test-patch:
> [exec] +1 overall.
> [exec]
> [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
> [exec]
> [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
> [exec]
> [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
> [exec]
> [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
> [exec]
> [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
> [exec]
> [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
>
> Unit-test:
> all pass
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
>