You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Dave Brosius <db...@mebigfatguy.com> on 2013/06/29 23:08:14 UTC

Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for cloudstack.


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
-------

code checks the parameter 'state' and if null, set it to Allocated, even though that parameter is never accessed. Meant to set the field 'state'.


Diffs
-----

  engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkVO.java 6580ea0 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Dave Brosius


Re: Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

Posted by Dave Brosius <db...@mebigfatguy.com>.

> On July 2, 2013, 7:11 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
> > Your change seems fine.
> > 
> > Did you regression test it? Or did you solve a problem with it?

Just noticed during code inspection


- Dave


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/#review22650
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m., Dave Brosius wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> code checks the parameter 'state' and if null, set it to Allocated, even though that parameter is never accessed. Meant to set the field 'state'.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkVO.java 6580ea0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dave Brosius
> 
>


Re: Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

Posted by Sanjay Tripathi <sa...@citrix.com>.

> On July 2, 2013, 7:11 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
> > Your change seems fine.
> > 
> > Did you regression test it? Or did you solve a problem with it?
> 
> Dave Brosius wrote:
>     Just noticed during code inspection

Dave, can you also open a ticket for this and mention your review request in the comment section of the ticket; it will help the community to track the issue.


- Sanjay


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/#review22650
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m., Dave Brosius wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> code checks the parameter 'state' and if null, set it to Allocated, even though that parameter is never accessed. Meant to set the field 'state'.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkVO.java 6580ea0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dave Brosius
> 
>


Re: Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

Posted by daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/#review22650
-----------------------------------------------------------


Your change seems fine.

Did you regression test it? Or did you solve a problem with it?

- daan Hoogland


On June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m., Dave Brosius wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> code checks the parameter 'state' and if null, set it to Allocated, even though that parameter is never accessed. Meant to set the field 'state'.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkVO.java 6580ea0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dave Brosius
> 
>


Re: Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

Posted by daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/#review28615
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


3fd95fe231bdde6045b81fae0f6ff1bd4c2c0918

- daan Hoogland


On June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m., Dave Brosius wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> code checks the parameter 'state' and if null, set it to Allocated, even though that parameter is never accessed. Meant to set the field 'state'.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkVO.java 6580ea0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dave Brosius
> 
>


Re: Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

Posted by "Jenkins Cloudstack.org" <hu...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/#review24405
-----------------------------------------------------------


Review 12192 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #97 is : http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/97/

- Jenkins Cloudstack.org


On June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m., Dave Brosius wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> code checks the parameter 'state' and if null, set it to Allocated, even though that parameter is never accessed. Meant to set the field 'state'.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkVO.java 6580ea0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dave Brosius
> 
>


Re: Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

Posted by Amogh Vasekar <am...@citrix.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/#review28418
-----------------------------------------------------------


Reminder-
Hi,
The review has been pending for long. Please update the patch since the build is failing.
Thanks

- Amogh Vasekar


On June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m., Dave Brosius wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 29, 2013, 9:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> code checks the parameter 'state' and if null, set it to Allocated, even though that parameter is never accessed. Meant to set the field 'state'.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkVO.java 6580ea0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dave Brosius
> 
>