You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Apache Spark (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/13 11:23:00 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (SPARK-33131) Fix grouping sets with having
clause can not resolve qualified col name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Apache Spark reassigned SPARK-33131:
------------------------------------
Assignee: (was: Apache Spark)
> Fix grouping sets with having clause can not resolve qualified col name
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-33131
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33131
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0
> Reporter: ulysses you
> Priority: Minor
>
> The method `ResolveAggregateFunctions.resolveFilterCondInAggregate` aims to do the two things
> 1. resolve the expression in having.
> 2. push the having extra agg expression to `Aggregate`
> However we only care about 2 now. If having clause resolution is successful but not exists extra agg expression, we will ignore the resolution. Here is a example:
> {code:java}
> -- Works resolved by ResolveReferences
> select c1 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1) having c1 = 1
> -- Works because of the extra expression c1
> select c1 as c2 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1) having t1.c1 = 1
> -- Failed
> select c1 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1) having t1.c1 = 1{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org