You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@edgent.apache.org by "Cazen Lee (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/10/13 06:33:20 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (EDGENT-268) Change licensing header in gradle
files
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15571024#comment-15571024 ]
Cazen Lee commented on EDGENT-268:
----------------------------------
When I insert a License header at first time, I was working with reference to the [Apache Aurora|https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/build.gradle]. However, I find that the most of the project using the [2] header when I try to search again.
But, same as Justin's opnion and following to the document that you mentioned, The purpose of [1] is intended to grant the Copyright and the Apache Licence to work that has been already created outside the ASF(APPLY THE APACHE LICENSE TO YOUR WORK)
I think that [2] is looks good on the work of the ASF(HEADERS FOR CODE DEVELOPED AT THE ASF).
> Change licensing header in gradle files
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: EDGENT-268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-268
> Project: Edgent
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Miscellaneous
> Reporter: Dale LaBossiere
>
> The gradle files have ASF license headers but they are of the form specified in [1]. The rest of the source files (java, shell) use the form specified in [2].
> Are the gradle files OK or do they need to be changed to use [2]?
> [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> From Justin: I would go with [2].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)