You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> on 2025/05/05 07:37:39 UTC
[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Hey all,
I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes
have been received.
Consider this my (binding) +1.
Airflow Providers are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
*apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the Provider
distributions.
*apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
Python "wheel" release.
The test procedure for PMC members is described in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
described in:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
Public keys are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
the artifact checksums when we actually release.
The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
candidates.
Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
after the
RC candidates are released.
You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Re: testing TinkerPop provider - was: Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
logs of tasks can be seen in airflow UI (http://localhost:28080
user/password => admin/admin) or in /opt/airflow/logs folder . Note also
that you will have to - likely create the right connection (you can also do
it via UI / Admin /Connection).
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:26 PM Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks, I'm not sure if setting the --use-airflow-version to 2.10.5 helped
> but this time when i installed/restarted the dag loaded properly.
>
> I'm now trying to get the actual connectivity to Gremlin Server to work now
> - still failing when the dag is executed. Given the simplicity of what I'm
> doing, i'm guessing that the Gremlin driver is simply not connecting to
> Gremlin Server for some reason. That said, I don't see much in the logs to
> help me. I know pretty much every single driver connection problem there is
> for TinkerPop, but the Airflow tmux screens aren't revealing any TinkerPop
> errors - maybe i'm not looking in the right place? sorry for so many basic
> questions...still extremely new to Airflow/Breeze.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:36 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > * Use --use-airflow-version 2.10.5
> > * actually install tinkerpop provider RC from PyPI - you need to install
> it
> > (and you need to restart all the components in tmux) - alternatively add
> > startyup script to install it
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/breeze/doc/02_customizing.rst#customizing-breeze-startup
> >
> > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:02 PM Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Changed the subject to not muddy the VOTE thread.
> > >
> > > Removing the --use-airflow-version seemed to help get things going, but
> > > still not quite working. The dag isn't loading properly - guess it
> can't
> > > find the TinkerPop provider for some reason:
> > >
> > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 241, in
> > > _call_with_frames_removed
> > > File "/files/dags/tinkerpop.py", line 7, in <module>
> > > from airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin import
> > > GremlinOperator
> > > ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
> > > 'airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin'
> > >
> > > I imagine I just don't quite know the Airflow/Breeze environment well
> > > enough yet. I'll keep trying as time allows but if anyone has any
> helpful
> > > hints to move my testing along more quickly I'm happy to hear them.
> > > thanks.....
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:19 AM Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Stephen,
> > > >
> > > > Did you copy paste the command below:
> > > > *breeze start-airflow --use-airflow-version 2.2.4 --python 3.9
> > --backend
> > > > postgres \*
> > > > * --load-example-dags --load-default-connections*
> > > >
> > > > This is likely because the command is probably super outdated now and
> > it
> > > > internally runs
> > > > some "removed" airflow commands? Generally speaking, `breeze down`
> and
> > > > reinstall
> > > > should fix it, but I guess the command needs to be updated too.
> Please
> > > feel
> > > > free to
> > > > open a PR for updating that command.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > Amogh Desai
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 5:06 PM Stephen Mallette <
> spmallette@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I was trying out the contributor instructions for testing the
> > release.
> > > I
> > > > > gravitated toward the instructions using Breeze:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#installing-with-breeze
> > > > >
> > > > > and am getting an error. I assume there's just something wrong with
> > my
> > > > > environment though I wondered if it were possible that some
> > > documentation
> > > > > had gotten out of date? When I the breeze command noted there i
> get:
> > > > >
> > > > > airflow command error: argument GROUP_OR_COMMAND: invalid choice:
> > > 'users'
> > > > > (choose from 'api-server', 'assets', 'backfill', 'cheat-sheet',
> > > 'config',
> > > > > 'connections', 'dag-processor', 'dags', 'db', 'info', 'jobs',
> > > 'kerberos',
> > > > > 'plugins', 'pools', 'providers', 'rotate-fernet-key', 'scheduler',
> > > > > 'standalone', 'tasks', 'triggerer', 'variables', 'version'), see
> help
> > > > > above.
> > > > >
> > > > > Error: check_environment returned 2. Exiting.
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried a few basic things to fix on my own like breeze cleanup,
> > > > > self-upgrade for breeze, tinkered with some of the arguments, but
> all
> > > > ended
> > > > > in this fashion. Just curious if anyone knows what might be wrong
> > > there?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This
> > > email
> > > > is
> > > > > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours -
> which
> > > > means
> > > > > > that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding
> > +1
> > > > > votes
> > > > > > have been received.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for
> the
> > > > > Provider
> > > > > > distributions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > > > Python "wheel" release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test
> this
> > > RC
> > > > is
> > > > > > described in:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> > community
> > > > are
> > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept
> here:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included
> in
> > > the
> > > > RC
> > > > > > candidates.
> > > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > > > documentation
> > > > > > after the
> > > > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> > > > > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Elad Kalif
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: testing TinkerPop provider - was: Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, I'm not sure if setting the --use-airflow-version to 2.10.5 helped
but this time when i installed/restarted the dag loaded properly.
I'm now trying to get the actual connectivity to Gremlin Server to work now
- still failing when the dag is executed. Given the simplicity of what I'm
doing, i'm guessing that the Gremlin driver is simply not connecting to
Gremlin Server for some reason. That said, I don't see much in the logs to
help me. I know pretty much every single driver connection problem there is
for TinkerPop, but the Airflow tmux screens aren't revealing any TinkerPop
errors - maybe i'm not looking in the right place? sorry for so many basic
questions...still extremely new to Airflow/Breeze.
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:36 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> * Use --use-airflow-version 2.10.5
> * actually install tinkerpop provider RC from PyPI - you need to install it
> (and you need to restart all the components in tmux) - alternatively add
> startyup script to install it
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/breeze/doc/02_customizing.rst#customizing-breeze-startup
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:02 PM Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Changed the subject to not muddy the VOTE thread.
> >
> > Removing the --use-airflow-version seemed to help get things going, but
> > still not quite working. The dag isn't loading properly - guess it can't
> > find the TinkerPop provider for some reason:
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 241, in
> > _call_with_frames_removed
> > File "/files/dags/tinkerpop.py", line 7, in <module>
> > from airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin import
> > GremlinOperator
> > ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
> > 'airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin'
> >
> > I imagine I just don't quite know the Airflow/Breeze environment well
> > enough yet. I'll keep trying as time allows but if anyone has any helpful
> > hints to move my testing along more quickly I'm happy to hear them.
> > thanks.....
> >
> > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:19 AM Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Stephen,
> > >
> > > Did you copy paste the command below:
> > > *breeze start-airflow --use-airflow-version 2.2.4 --python 3.9
> --backend
> > > postgres \*
> > > * --load-example-dags --load-default-connections*
> > >
> > > This is likely because the command is probably super outdated now and
> it
> > > internally runs
> > > some "removed" airflow commands? Generally speaking, `breeze down` and
> > > reinstall
> > > should fix it, but I guess the command needs to be updated too. Please
> > feel
> > > free to
> > > open a PR for updating that command.
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > Amogh Desai
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 5:06 PM Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was trying out the contributor instructions for testing the
> release.
> > I
> > > > gravitated toward the instructions using Breeze:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#installing-with-breeze
> > > >
> > > > and am getting an error. I assume there's just something wrong with
> my
> > > > environment though I wondered if it were possible that some
> > documentation
> > > > had gotten out of date? When I the breeze command noted there i get:
> > > >
> > > > airflow command error: argument GROUP_OR_COMMAND: invalid choice:
> > 'users'
> > > > (choose from 'api-server', 'assets', 'backfill', 'cheat-sheet',
> > 'config',
> > > > 'connections', 'dag-processor', 'dags', 'db', 'info', 'jobs',
> > 'kerberos',
> > > > 'plugins', 'pools', 'providers', 'rotate-fernet-key', 'scheduler',
> > > > 'standalone', 'tasks', 'triggerer', 'variables', 'version'), see help
> > > > above.
> > > >
> > > > Error: check_environment returned 2. Exiting.
> > > >
> > > > I tried a few basic things to fix on my own like breeze cleanup,
> > > > self-upgrade for breeze, tinkered with some of the arguments, but all
> > > ended
> > > > in this fashion. Just curious if anyone knows what might be wrong
> > there?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This
> > email
> > > is
> > > > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> > > means
> > > > > that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding
> +1
> > > > votes
> > > > > have been received.
> > > > >
> > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > > >
> > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > > > Provider
> > > > > distributions.
> > > > >
> > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > > Python "wheel" release.
> > > > >
> > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > >
> > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> > RC
> > > is
> > > > > described in:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > >
> > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> community
> > > are
> > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > > > >
> > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> > > > >
> > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> > the
> > > RC
> > > > > candidates.
> > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > > documentation
> > > > > after the
> > > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> > > > >
> > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Elad Kalif
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: testing TinkerPop provider - was: Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
* Use --use-airflow-version 2.10.5
* actually install tinkerpop provider RC from PyPI - you need to install it
(and you need to restart all the components in tmux) - alternatively add
startyup script to install it
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/breeze/doc/02_customizing.rst#customizing-breeze-startup
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:02 PM Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Changed the subject to not muddy the VOTE thread.
>
> Removing the --use-airflow-version seemed to help get things going, but
> still not quite working. The dag isn't loading properly - guess it can't
> find the TinkerPop provider for some reason:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 241, in
> _call_with_frames_removed
> File "/files/dags/tinkerpop.py", line 7, in <module>
> from airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin import
> GremlinOperator
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
> 'airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin'
>
> I imagine I just don't quite know the Airflow/Breeze environment well
> enough yet. I'll keep trying as time allows but if anyone has any helpful
> hints to move my testing along more quickly I'm happy to hear them.
> thanks.....
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:19 AM Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Stephen,
> >
> > Did you copy paste the command below:
> > *breeze start-airflow --use-airflow-version 2.2.4 --python 3.9 --backend
> > postgres \*
> > * --load-example-dags --load-default-connections*
> >
> > This is likely because the command is probably super outdated now and it
> > internally runs
> > some "removed" airflow commands? Generally speaking, `breeze down` and
> > reinstall
> > should fix it, but I guess the command needs to be updated too. Please
> feel
> > free to
> > open a PR for updating that command.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Amogh Desai
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 5:06 PM Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was trying out the contributor instructions for testing the release.
> I
> > > gravitated toward the instructions using Breeze:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#installing-with-breeze
> > >
> > > and am getting an error. I assume there's just something wrong with my
> > > environment though I wondered if it were possible that some
> documentation
> > > had gotten out of date? When I the breeze command noted there i get:
> > >
> > > airflow command error: argument GROUP_OR_COMMAND: invalid choice:
> 'users'
> > > (choose from 'api-server', 'assets', 'backfill', 'cheat-sheet',
> 'config',
> > > 'connections', 'dag-processor', 'dags', 'db', 'info', 'jobs',
> 'kerberos',
> > > 'plugins', 'pools', 'providers', 'rotate-fernet-key', 'scheduler',
> > > 'standalone', 'tasks', 'triggerer', 'variables', 'version'), see help
> > > above.
> > >
> > > Error: check_environment returned 2. Exiting.
> > >
> > > I tried a few basic things to fix on my own like breeze cleanup,
> > > self-upgrade for breeze, tinkered with some of the arguments, but all
> > ended
> > > in this fashion. Just curious if anyone knows what might be wrong
> there?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This
> email
> > is
> > > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> > means
> > > > that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> > > votes
> > > > have been received.
> > > >
> > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > >
> > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > >
> > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > > Provider
> > > > distributions.
> > > >
> > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > Python "wheel" release.
> > > >
> > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > >
> > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> RC
> > is
> > > > described in:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> > are
> > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > >
> > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > > >
> > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> > > >
> > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> the
> > RC
> > > > candidates.
> > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > documentation
> > > > after the
> > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > >
> > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > >
> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Elad Kalif
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
testing TinkerPop provider - was: Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
Changed the subject to not muddy the VOTE thread.
Removing the --use-airflow-version seemed to help get things going, but
still not quite working. The dag isn't loading properly - guess it can't
find the TinkerPop provider for some reason:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 241, in
_call_with_frames_removed
File "/files/dags/tinkerpop.py", line 7, in <module>
from airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin import
GremlinOperator
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin'
I imagine I just don't quite know the Airflow/Breeze environment well
enough yet. I'll keep trying as time allows but if anyone has any helpful
hints to move my testing along more quickly I'm happy to hear them.
thanks.....
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:19 AM Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Did you copy paste the command below:
> *breeze start-airflow --use-airflow-version 2.2.4 --python 3.9 --backend
> postgres \*
> * --load-example-dags --load-default-connections*
>
> This is likely because the command is probably super outdated now and it
> internally runs
> some "removed" airflow commands? Generally speaking, `breeze down` and
> reinstall
> should fix it, but I guess the command needs to be updated too. Please feel
> free to
> open a PR for updating that command.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 5:06 PM Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I was trying out the contributor instructions for testing the release. I
> > gravitated toward the instructions using Breeze:
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#installing-with-breeze
> >
> > and am getting an error. I assume there's just something wrong with my
> > environment though I wondered if it were possible that some documentation
> > had gotten out of date? When I the breeze command noted there i get:
> >
> > airflow command error: argument GROUP_OR_COMMAND: invalid choice: 'users'
> > (choose from 'api-server', 'assets', 'backfill', 'cheat-sheet', 'config',
> > 'connections', 'dag-processor', 'dags', 'db', 'info', 'jobs', 'kerberos',
> > 'plugins', 'pools', 'providers', 'rotate-fernet-key', 'scheduler',
> > 'standalone', 'tasks', 'triggerer', 'variables', 'version'), see help
> > above.
> >
> > Error: check_environment returned 2. Exiting.
> >
> > I tried a few basic things to fix on my own like breeze cleanup,
> > self-upgrade for breeze, tinkered with some of the arguments, but all
> ended
> > in this fashion. Just curious if anyone knows what might be wrong there?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
> is
> > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> means
> > > that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> > votes
> > > have been received.
> > >
> > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > >
> > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > >
> > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > Provider
> > > distributions.
> > >
> > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > Python "wheel" release.
> > >
> > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > >
> > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
> is
> > > described in:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > >
> > >
> > > Public keys are available at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> are
> > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >
> > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > >
> > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> > >
> > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
> RC
> > > candidates.
> > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > documentation
> > > after the
> > > RC candidates are released.
> > >
> > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Elad Kalif
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>.
Hello Stephen,
Did you copy paste the command below:
*breeze start-airflow --use-airflow-version 2.2.4 --python 3.9 --backend
postgres \*
* --load-example-dags --load-default-connections*
This is likely because the command is probably super outdated now and it
internally runs
some "removed" airflow commands? Generally speaking, `breeze down` and
reinstall
should fix it, but I guess the command needs to be updated too. Please feel
free to
open a PR for updating that command.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 5:06 PM Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I was trying out the contributor instructions for testing the release. I
> gravitated toward the instructions using Breeze:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#installing-with-breeze
>
> and am getting an error. I assume there's just something wrong with my
> environment though I wondered if it were possible that some documentation
> had gotten out of date? When I the breeze command noted there i get:
>
> airflow command error: argument GROUP_OR_COMMAND: invalid choice: 'users'
> (choose from 'api-server', 'assets', 'backfill', 'cheat-sheet', 'config',
> 'connections', 'dag-processor', 'dags', 'db', 'info', 'jobs', 'kerberos',
> 'plugins', 'pools', 'providers', 'rotate-fernet-key', 'scheduler',
> 'standalone', 'tasks', 'triggerer', 'variables', 'version'), see help
> above.
>
> Error: check_environment returned 2. Exiting.
>
> I tried a few basic things to fix on my own like breeze cleanup,
> self-upgrade for breeze, tinkered with some of the arguments, but all ended
> in this fashion. Just curious if anyone knows what might be wrong there?
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
> > that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> votes
> > have been received.
> >
> > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >
> > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> >
> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> Provider
> > distributions.
> >
> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > Python "wheel" release.
> >
> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >
> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> > described in:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >
> >
> > Public keys are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >
> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >
> > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> >
> > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> > candidates.
> > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> documentation
> > after the
> > RC candidates are released.
> >
> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Elad Kalif
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
This instruction has airflow 2.2.4 mentioned - I guess you used the old
airflow version - this is likely some old airflow version that it tries to
install. Try with 2.10.5 or even without `--use-airflow-version`. And PR to
update those instructions might be a good first contribution once you
figure it out.
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 1:36 PM Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I was trying out the contributor instructions for testing the release. I
> gravitated toward the instructions using Breeze:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#installing-with-breeze
>
> and am getting an error. I assume there's just something wrong with my
> environment though I wondered if it were possible that some documentation
> had gotten out of date? When I the breeze command noted there i get:
>
> airflow command error: argument GROUP_OR_COMMAND: invalid choice: 'users'
> (choose from 'api-server', 'assets', 'backfill', 'cheat-sheet', 'config',
> 'connections', 'dag-processor', 'dags', 'db', 'info', 'jobs', 'kerberos',
> 'plugins', 'pools', 'providers', 'rotate-fernet-key', 'scheduler',
> 'standalone', 'tasks', 'triggerer', 'variables', 'version'), see help
> above.
>
> Error: check_environment returned 2. Exiting.
>
> I tried a few basic things to fix on my own like breeze cleanup,
> self-upgrade for breeze, tinkered with some of the arguments, but all ended
> in this fashion. Just curious if anyone knows what might be wrong there?
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
> > that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> votes
> > have been received.
> >
> > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >
> > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> >
> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> Provider
> > distributions.
> >
> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > Python "wheel" release.
> >
> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >
> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> > described in:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >
> >
> > Public keys are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >
> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >
> > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> >
> > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> > candidates.
> > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> documentation
> > after the
> > RC candidates are released.
> >
> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Elad Kalif
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
I was trying out the contributor instructions for testing the release. I
gravitated toward the instructions using Breeze:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#installing-with-breeze
and am getting an error. I assume there's just something wrong with my
environment though I wondered if it were possible that some documentation
had gotten out of date? When I the breeze command noted there i get:
airflow command error: argument GROUP_OR_COMMAND: invalid choice: 'users'
(choose from 'api-server', 'assets', 'backfill', 'cheat-sheet', 'config',
'connections', 'dag-processor', 'dags', 'db', 'info', 'jobs', 'kerberos',
'plugins', 'pools', 'providers', 'rotate-fernet-key', 'scheduler',
'standalone', 'tasks', 'triggerer', 'variables', 'version'), see help above.
Error: check_environment returned 2. Exiting.
I tried a few basic things to fix on my own like breeze cleanup,
self-upgrade for breeze, tinkered with some of the arguments, but all ended
in this fashion. Just curious if anyone knows what might be wrong there?
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
> that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes
> have been received.
>
> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>
> Airflow Providers are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>
> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the Provider
> distributions.
>
> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> Python "wheel" release.
>
> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>
> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> described in:
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>
>
> Public keys are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>
> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>
> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
>
> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> candidates.
> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
> after the
> RC candidates are released.
>
> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
>
> Cheers,
> Elad Kalif
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org>.
providers amazon and snowflake will be excluded due to bugs found.
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 4:05 PM Ahmad Farhan <ah...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) - Tested the new Apache TinkerPop provider on Airflow
> 2.10.5 with my own testing DAG and works as expected.
> Thanks,
> Farhan
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:29 PM Jens Scheffler <j_...@gmx.de.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build,
> > Licenses, Signatures
> >
> > Had no time to test packages though.
> >
> > On 05.05.25 12:25, Amogh Desai wrote:
> > > +1 non binding.
> > >
> > > My changes this time were only for CI fixes, those look good. And
> > generally
> > > my dag suite tests look fine
> > > as well.
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > Amogh Desai
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 1:44 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums,
> licences.
> > >> Checked my changes. installed the providers in latest airflow and
> > checked
> > >> that the SQS common.messaging is properly imported with deprecation
> from
> > >> the old place - and common.messaging discovers it properly. All looks
> > good!
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 9:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hey all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This
> email
> > is
> > >>> calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> > means
> > >>> that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> > >> votes
> > >>> have been received.
> > >>>
> > >>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > >>>
> > >>> Airflow Providers are available at:
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > >>>
> > >>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > >>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > >> Provider
> > >>> distributions.
> > >>>
> > >>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > >>> Python "wheel" release.
> > >>>
> > >>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > >>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> RC
> > is
> > >>> described in:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > >>>
> > >>> Public keys are available at:
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote accordingly:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 approve
> > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >>>
> > >>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> > are
> > >>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >>>
> > >>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > >>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > >>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > >>>
> > >>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> > >>>
> > >>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> the
> > RC
> > >>> candidates.
> > >>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > >> documentation
> > >>> after the
> > >>> RC candidates are released.
> > >>>
> > >>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> > >>>
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> > >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Elad Kalif
> > >>>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Ahmad Farhan <ah...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding) - Tested the new Apache TinkerPop provider on Airflow
2.10.5 with my own testing DAG and works as expected.
Thanks,
Farhan
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:29 PM Jens Scheffler <j_...@gmx.de.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build,
> Licenses, Signatures
>
> Had no time to test packages though.
>
> On 05.05.25 12:25, Amogh Desai wrote:
> > +1 non binding.
> >
> > My changes this time were only for CI fixes, those look good. And
> generally
> > my dag suite tests look fine
> > as well.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Amogh Desai
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 1:44 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences.
> >> Checked my changes. installed the providers in latest airflow and
> checked
> >> that the SQS common.messaging is properly imported with deprecation from
> >> the old place - and common.messaging discovers it properly. All looks
> good!
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 9:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey all,
> >>>
> >>> I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
> is
> >>> calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> means
> >>> that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> >> votes
> >>> have been received.
> >>>
> >>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >>>
> >>> Airflow Providers are available at:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> >>>
> >>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> >>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> >> Provider
> >>> distributions.
> >>>
> >>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> >>> Python "wheel" release.
> >>>
> >>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
> is
> >>> described in:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >>>
> >>> Public keys are available at:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please vote accordingly:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >>>
> >>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> are
> >>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >>>
> >>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> >>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> >>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >>>
> >>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> >>>
> >>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
> RC
> >>> candidates.
> >>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> >> documentation
> >>> after the
> >>> RC candidates are released.
> >>>
> >>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> >>>
> >>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Elad Kalif
> >>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Jens Scheffler <j_...@gmx.de.INVALID>.
+1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build,
Licenses, Signatures
Had no time to test packages though.
On 05.05.25 12:25, Amogh Desai wrote:
> +1 non binding.
>
> My changes this time were only for CI fixes, those look good. And generally
> my dag suite tests look fine
> as well.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 1:44 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences.
>> Checked my changes. installed the providers in latest airflow and checked
>> that the SQS common.messaging is properly imported with deprecation from
>> the old place - and common.messaging discovers it properly. All looks good!
>>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 9:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>>> calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
>>> that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
>> votes
>>> have been received.
>>>
>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>>
>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>>
>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
>> Provider
>>> distributions.
>>>
>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>>> Python "wheel" release.
>>>
>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
>>> described in:
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>>>
>>> Public keys are available at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>
>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>>
>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>>
>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
>>>
>>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
>>> candidates.
>>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
>> documentation
>>> after the
>>> RC candidates are released.
>>>
>>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>>>
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
>>>
>>>
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
>>>
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Elad Kalif
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>.
+1 non binding.
My changes this time were only for CI fixes, those look good. And generally
my dag suite tests look fine
as well.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 1:44 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences.
> Checked my changes. installed the providers in latest airflow and checked
> that the SQS common.messaging is properly imported with deprecation from
> the old place - and common.messaging discovers it properly. All looks good!
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 9:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
> > that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> votes
> > have been received.
> >
> > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >
> > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> >
> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> Provider
> > distributions.
> >
> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > Python "wheel" release.
> >
> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >
> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> > described in:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >
> >
> > Public keys are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >
> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >
> > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> >
> > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> > candidates.
> > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> documentation
> > after the
> > RC candidates are released.
> >
> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Elad Kalif
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
+1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences.
Checked my changes. installed the providers in latest airflow and checked
that the SQS common.messaging is properly imported with deprecation from
the old place - and common.messaging discovers it properly. All looks good!
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 9:38 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
> that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes
> have been received.
>
> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>
> Airflow Providers are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>
> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the Provider
> distributions.
>
> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> Python "wheel" release.
>
> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>
> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> described in:
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>
>
> Public keys are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>
> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>
> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
>
> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> candidates.
> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
> after the
> RC candidates are released.
>
> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
>
> Cheers,
> Elad Kalif
>