You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-issues@incubator.apache.org by "Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org> on 2006/06/21 21:35:30 UTC
[jira] Assigned: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default
handling
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33?page=all ]
Matthias Weßendorf reassigned ADFFACES-33:
------------------------------------------
Assign To: Matthias Weßendorf
> Facet display name vs. default handling
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ADFFACES-33
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33
> Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
> Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Environment: Facet metadata
> Reporter: Matt Cooper
> Assignee: Matthias Weßendorf
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: adf-faces.patch
>
> The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the same value as "facet-name". The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time. By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry. Since both pieces are identical, we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
> In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive display name for the facet.
> Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary display-name entries are removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira