fop beta performance

[Jimmy Dixon <ji...@perfiliate.com>]

Is the new FOP beta any faster than the previous release?

Cheers.
Jimmy.

-- 
Jimmy Dixon, Perfiliate Technologies
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
email   :  jimmy.dixon@perfiliate.com
phone   :  +44 (0)191 241 6500
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Registered Office:
Perfiliate Technologies Limited
7-15 Pink Lane,
Newcastle upon Tyne. NE1 5DW
Registered No. 3783384 in the UK
 
Telephone +44 (0)191 241 6500
Facsimile +44 (0)191 241 9302
 
www.perfiliate.com
 
Please note that electronic mail may be monitored.
 
This e-mail is confidential. If you received it by mistake, please let us know and then delete it from your system; you should not copy, disclose, or distribute its contents to anyone nor act in reliance on this e-mail, as this is prohibited and may be unlawful. We check all emails for viruses, but please note that we do not accept liability for any viruses which may be transmitted in or with this email.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: fop beta performance

[Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>]

Find out for us! :-) I did some tests a few months ago and back then the
new code was indeed a little faster. In the meantime, new features have
found their way in and the situation may look differently. Note also,
that there has been no performance optimization work in the layout
engine, yet, like it was done for 0.20.5.

On 20.02.2006 11:31:57 Jimmy Dixon wrote:
> Is the new FOP beta any faster than the previous release?



Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org