You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> on 2017/03/05 10:21:27 UTC
[DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC3
Hi,
Please discuss the release candidate here and not in the vote thread.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC3
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
HI,
> That sounds bad. We should add this to the install instructions ?
It’s already mentioned in the README.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC3
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
That sounds bad. We should add this to the install instructions ?
Tom
On 06/03/17 09:52, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> And if you are having problems downloading osmf \u2026 keep in mind to install the Java Cryptography Extension to the JRE you are using:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38203971/javax-net-ssl-sslhandshakeexception-received-fatal-alert-handshake-failure/38264878#38264878
>
> In my case I couldn\u2019t download OSMF without it.
>
> Chris
>
> Am 06.03.17, 07:14 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Isn't it just as easy to add an exclude in the source packaging of the
> > build.xml?
>
> Sure we could do that instead.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC3
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
And if you are having problems downloading osmf … keep in mind to install the Java Cryptography Extension to the JRE you are using:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38203971/javax-net-ssl-sslhandshakeexception-received-fatal-alert-handshake-failure/38264878#38264878
In my case I couldn’t download OSMF without it.
Chris
Am 06.03.17, 07:14 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
Hi,
> Isn't it just as easy to add an exclude in the source packaging of the
> build.xml?
Sure we could do that instead.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC3
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Isn't it just as easy to add an exclude in the source packaging of the
> build.xml?
Sure we could do that instead.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC3
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/5/17, 9:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> FWIW, a mustella/local.properties file is in the source package that
>> points to some folder on Justin's computer which causes checkintests to
>> fail. Deleting the local.properties file fixed it for me.
>
>Perhaps we should remove this from the gitignore file?
IMO, folks should be able to use local.properties if they need to and not
worry about it being committed.
Isn't it just as easy to add an exclude in the source packaging of the
build.xml?
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC3
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> FWIW, a mustella/local.properties file is in the source package that
> points to some folder on Justin's computer which causes checkintests to
> fail. Deleting the local.properties file fixed it for me.
Perhaps we should remove this from the gitignore file?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC3
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
FWIW, a mustella/local.properties file is in the source package that
points to some folder on Justin's computer which causes checkintests to
fail. Deleting the local.properties file fixed it for me.
-Alex
On 3/5/17, 2:21 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Please discuss the release candidate here and not in the vote thread.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin