check_rbl sometimes does not work

[Nick I <ni...@gmail.com>]

Hello,

We use internal rbldnsd 0.996b, postfix-2.11, amavisd-new-2.8.0-4.el6,
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1running on Perl version 5.10.1, CentOS 6.5.
On the same server used bind9 as cache DNS server

Example of spamassassin rbl check.
header __RCVD_IN_DNSWL                 eval:check_rbl('rep-domain',
'rep.domain.com.')
describe __RCVD_IN_DNSWL               Sender listed at rep.domain.com
tflags  __RCVD_IN_DNSWL                net nice

header REP_N_1                 eval:check_rbl_sub('rep-domain', '127.1.1.0')
describe REP_N_1               Sender listed at rep.domain.com
tflags REP_N_1                 nice net
score REP_N_1 -1

The problems we have are:
1) very rare spamassassin do not make any test at custom check_rbl
for IP which exist it rbldnsd
2) check_rbl never executed if user sasl authenticated.

Please suggest a solution.

Thanks.

Re: check_rbl sometimes does not work

[Nick I <ni...@gmail.com>]

I made a test with message size 941105 bytes and rbl does work.
In amavisd
$sa_mail_body_size_limit = 1024*4096;

Also i did not found size limit control when spamassassin called by amavisd.

2014-02-20 18:18 GMT+02:00 Martin Gregorie <ma...@gregorie.org>:

> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 14:32 +0200, Nick I wrote:
> > The problems we have are:
> > 1) very rare spamassassin do not make any test at custom check_rbl
> > for IP which exist it rbldnsd
> >
> Do the unchecked message exceed the maximum message size?
> Default is 512Kb. If the unchecked messages are bigger, raise the limit.
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>

Re: check_rbl sometimes does not work

[Martin Gregorie <ma...@gregorie.org>]

On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 14:32 +0200, Nick I wrote:
> The problems we have are:
> 1) very rare spamassassin do not make any test at custom check_rbl
> for IP which exist it rbldnsd
>
Do the unchecked message exceed the maximum message size? 
Default is 512Kb. If the unchecked messages are bigger, raise the limit.


Martin

Re: check_rbl sometimes does not work

["Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>]

On 2/20/2014 7:32 AM, Nick I wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use internal rbldnsd 0.996b, postfix-2.11, amavisd-new-2.8.0-4.el6, 
> SpamAssassin version 3.3.1running on Perl version 5.10.1, CentOS 6.5.
> On the same server used bind9 as cache DNS server
3.3.1 was release almost 4 years ago.  Please consider 3.4.0.  I don't 
think many of us can intelligently discuss things on a version that old.

Regards,
KAM