You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@devicemap.apache.org by "eberhard speer jr." <se...@ducis.net> on 2014/07/09 16:48:05 UTC
W3C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Reza,
my .Net implementations of the W3C interface are ready and like you
the questions I'm now facing is how to integrate.
Maybe we should bounce around some ideas and coordinate the
integration to the extent our respective 'platforms' allow ?
esjr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTvVYlAAoJEOxywXcFLKYciGwIAJfHGpUzpdwkm6DGmTuedzRE
vSVLG0LFcgrjvWyMMvJHN8s7R30eb/yubVZWAk28dz53SaG+HKznJP8r9b2nMwnA
CeAB/nz0/jQ09HlF59ycFhHPJPLBHl8SEcRniay1Y02c55Pnr06i9r9eVmumIjnu
47+J6dBGVxyUH4ShbeHcOxA2JuCPSB4jasESF2jFaG0fUwbODVabSV7wPIMMaY8I
2G6mQKBKl211xvNZtm4QnO0yZ9ak1Kx7CPN+z0x5thq4HDKDbM1AcIV4L0Q80VlX
Hb881GzQInDOsY9VK6zzFTUHtQtmNUX/QhLRpNiKweoPKQLMtwC9zaHrKzm04Kw=
=Pefu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: W3C
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Eberhard/all,
Thanks, I don't have a .NET environment to take a closer look, but just on
a high level, does it implement any of the W3C "Specs" as per
http://www.w3.org/TR/DDR-Simple-API/ ?
If the answer is "Yes" then for consistency we should insist on having a
similar compatible implementation (aka "DeviceMap Simple DDR") for Java and
any other language or platform we support.
If the .NET version was to completely ignore or abandon the W3C specs, then
backward-compatibility and a migration path for OpenDDR (and to a certain
extent others, e.g. MaDDR, DeviceAtlas,...) users would be the main
argument for the compatible W3C implementation. We need to decide as
project and team if we want to provide that or not.
The current "classifier" uses the same file-structure, maybe in other even
optimized ways (see WURFL[?]) but it is not compatible with the W3C
interfaces in any way.
Werner
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:48 PM, eberhard speer jr. <se...@ducis.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Reza,
>
> my .Net implementations of the W3C interface are ready and like you
> the questions I'm now facing is how to integrate.
> Maybe we should bounce around some ideas and coordinate the
> integration to the extent our respective 'platforms' allow ?
>
> esjr
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTvVYlAAoJEOxywXcFLKYciGwIAJfHGpUzpdwkm6DGmTuedzRE
> vSVLG0LFcgrjvWyMMvJHN8s7R30eb/yubVZWAk28dz53SaG+HKznJP8r9b2nMwnA
> CeAB/nz0/jQ09HlF59ycFhHPJPLBHl8SEcRniay1Y02c55Pnr06i9r9eVmumIjnu
> 47+J6dBGVxyUH4ShbeHcOxA2JuCPSB4jasESF2jFaG0fUwbODVabSV7wPIMMaY8I
> 2G6mQKBKl211xvNZtm4QnO0yZ9ak1Kx7CPN+z0x5thq4HDKDbM1AcIV4L0Q80VlX
> Hb881GzQInDOsY9VK6zzFTUHtQtmNUX/QhLRpNiKweoPKQLMtwC9zaHrKzm04Kw=
> =Pefu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: W3C
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Without W3C compatibility the 1.0.0 release is useless to most people, the
Simple DDR API IS the 1.0.0 release that has been ready for over 1.5 years
now, it just wasn't bothered to be tagged by anybody[?]
IMHO the "new client" is a good effort towards a 1.x release, just look at
Tomcat 3-8 and how it graduated, but the W3C DDR API is neither dead nor
outdated.
Not sure about MaDDR (it is not accessible here behind the firewall) but
just visit the site of the clear market leader in this area DeviceAtlas
what it states about W3C compatibility:
https://deviceatlas.com/resources/general
>The API software is not updated very frequently, we want to make sure that
the load on developers is as low as possible. The JSON file is updated
daily.
explains why e.g. the W3C Simple DDR API may not undergo as many changes
here at DeviceMap either. The "JSON file" is the equivalent to our XML
files, I don't see we'd update that on a daily basis, so instead of
creating a "fork" of the W3C API maybe we should focus on what really
matters, MAINTAINING device data[?]
Werner
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Reza <re...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> I agree. I would like to spend some time researching w3c support for the
> java client. I have not had anytime to do this since I have been focusing
> on getting our 1.0.0 release ready.
>
> It seems that Werner is trying to focus on the legacy oddr java client,
> not sure how that helps this research effort out other than causing mass
> confusion...
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: eberhard speer jr. <se...@ducis.net>
> To: devicemap-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 10:48 AM
> Subject: W3C
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Reza,
>
> my .Net implementations of the W3C interface are ready and like you
> the questions I'm now facing is how to integrate.
> Maybe we should bounce around some ideas and coordinate the
> integration to the extent our respective 'platforms' allow ?
>
> esjr
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTvVYlAAoJEOxywXcFLKYciGwIAJfHGpUzpdwkm6DGmTuedzRE
> vSVLG0LFcgrjvWyMMvJHN8s7R30eb/yubVZWAk28dz53SaG+HKznJP8r9b2nMwnA
> CeAB/nz0/jQ09HlF59ycFhHPJPLBHl8SEcRniay1Y02c55Pnr06i9r9eVmumIjnu
> 47+J6dBGVxyUH4ShbeHcOxA2JuCPSB4jasESF2jFaG0fUwbODVabSV7wPIMMaY8I
> 2G6mQKBKl211xvNZtm4QnO0yZ9ak1Kx7CPN+z0x5thq4HDKDbM1AcIV4L0Q80VlX
> Hb881GzQInDOsY9VK6zzFTUHtQtmNUX/QhLRpNiKweoPKQLMtwC9zaHrKzm04Kw=
> =Pefu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: W3C
Posted by Reza <re...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
I agree. I would like to spend some time researching w3c support for the java client. I have not had anytime to do this since I have been focusing on getting our 1.0.0 release ready.
It seems that Werner is trying to focus on the legacy oddr java client, not sure how that helps this research effort out other than causing mass confusion...
________________________________
From: eberhard speer jr. <se...@ducis.net>
To: devicemap-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 10:48 AM
Subject: W3C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Reza,
my .Net implementations of the W3C interface are ready and like you
the questions I'm now facing is how to integrate.
Maybe we should bounce around some ideas and coordinate the
integration to the extent our respective 'platforms' allow ?
esjr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTvVYlAAoJEOxywXcFLKYciGwIAJfHGpUzpdwkm6DGmTuedzRE
vSVLG0LFcgrjvWyMMvJHN8s7R30eb/yubVZWAk28dz53SaG+HKznJP8r9b2nMwnA
CeAB/nz0/jQ09HlF59ycFhHPJPLBHl8SEcRniay1Y02c55Pnr06i9r9eVmumIjnu
47+J6dBGVxyUH4ShbeHcOxA2JuCPSB4jasESF2jFaG0fUwbODVabSV7wPIMMaY8I
2G6mQKBKl211xvNZtm4QnO0yZ9ak1Kx7CPN+z0x5thq4HDKDbM1AcIV4L0Q80VlX
Hb881GzQInDOsY9VK6zzFTUHtQtmNUX/QhLRpNiKweoPKQLMtwC9zaHrKzm04Kw=
=Pefu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----