You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/01/15 15:05:28 UTC
[GitHub] [flink] kl0u commented on a change in pull request #10685:
[FLINK-14843][e2e] Refactor bucketing sink test to make it more stable and
comprehensible
kl0u commented on a change in pull request #10685: [FLINK-14843][e2e] Refactor bucketing sink test to make it more stable and comprehensible
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/10685#discussion_r366922616
##########
File path: flink-end-to-end-tests/flink-bucketing-sink-test/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/tests/BucketingSinkTestProgram.java
##########
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
.setBucketer(new KeyBucketer())
.setBatchSize(Long.MAX_VALUE)
.setBatchRolloverInterval(Long.MAX_VALUE)
- .setInactiveBucketCheckInterval(Long.MAX_VALUE)
- .setInactiveBucketThreshold(Long.MAX_VALUE);
+ .setInactiveBucketCheckInterval(2000)
Review comment:
Why not setting the values to something smaller so that the test runs faster?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services