You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by "James Strachan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/10/21 13:56:52 UTC

[jira] Created: (CAMEL-1008) remove more context-free DSL methods

remove more context-free DSL methods
------------------------------------

                 Key: CAMEL-1008
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1008
             Project: Apache Camel
          Issue Type: Task
            Reporter: James Strachan
             Fix For: 2.0.0


there are a number of DSL methods in the base class which can be kinda used anywhere - which can lead to confusion... e.g.

http://www.nabble.com/Non-registry-beans-td20088181s22882.html

as part of 2.0.0 we should try zap most of the public methods which don't make much sense - so we encourage folks to use the context based methods.

e.g. rather than

{code}
filter(someStaticMethod).to()
{code}

we should prefer

{code}
filter().xpath("..".to()
{code}

i.e. using *filter().* in an IDE will show a better completion list than allowing any static method import 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-1008) remove more context-free DSL methods

Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=49813#action_49813 ] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-1008:
------------------------------------

But sometimes you need to former when you need to build predicates
{code}
filter(header("type").in("gold,silver")).to
{code}

You cannot do that in the fluent builder
{code}
filter().header("type").in("gold,silver")).XXXX compiler gets fuzzed and you only have eg java.lang.Object methods, you can not continue the route to 
{code}



> remove more context-free DSL methods
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1008
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1008
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: James Strachan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> there are a number of DSL methods in the base class which can be kinda used anywhere - which can lead to confusion... e.g.
> http://www.nabble.com/Non-registry-beans-td20088181s22882.html
> as part of 2.0.0 we should try zap most of the public methods which don't make much sense - so we encourage folks to use the context based methods.
> e.g. rather than
> {code}
> filter(someStaticMethod).to()
> {code}
> we should prefer
> {code}
> filter().xpath("..".to()
> {code}
> i.e. using *filter().* in an IDE will show a better completion list than allowing any static method import 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-1008) remove more context-free DSL methods

Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-1008.
--------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

> remove more context-free DSL methods
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1008
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1008
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: James Strachan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> there are a number of DSL methods in the base class which can be kinda used anywhere - which can lead to confusion... e.g.
> http://www.nabble.com/Non-registry-beans-td20088181s22882.html
> as part of 2.0.0 we should try zap most of the public methods which don't make much sense - so we encourage folks to use the context based methods.
> e.g. rather than
> {code}
> filter(someStaticMethod).to()
> {code}
> we should prefer
> {code}
> filter().xpath("..".to()
> {code}
> i.e. using *filter().* in an IDE will show a better completion list than allowing any static method import 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.