Re: [Bug 6196] FH_HELO_ENDS_DOT rule is overly aggressive in assigning a spam score

[Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>]

On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 16:37 -0400, Tom Pawlowski wrote:
> I mistakenly thought replying via email would also update the web
> frontend, as a lot ticketing systems do. When you requested I add my
> reply to the comment field on the Bugzilla site, I did just that, so
> my original reply was resubmitted.

In that case, you should have at least added the sender, too, not only
John and me. ;)  Anyway...

> As for the URL, I did see your comment about it. It was more for the
> benefit of John in case it wasn't rendering on his end for whatever
> reason since he didn't see it the first time. Is that really something
> to throw a hissy fit over?

Tom, please accept my apology -- you just caught me in a bad moment with
that, and I vented over a penny before really thinking a second time. I
should know better.


> 2009/9/11 Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>:
[...]
> > Sorry, really couldn't resist the urge to vent.  Back to my cave now.

-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Re: [Bug 6196] FH_HELO_ENDS_DOT rule is overly aggressive in assigning a spam score

[John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 16:37 -0400, Tom Pawlowski wrote:
>> As for the URL, I did see your comment about it. It was more for the
>> benefit of John in case it wasn't rendering on his end for whatever
>> reason since he didn't see it the first time.

I said that because I don't yet have the habit of looking for the explicit 
URL field and was looking for it in the text body. My bad, for that I 
blush and apologize.

-- 
  John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
  jhardin@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   USMC Rules of Gunfighting #2: Anything worth shooting is worth
   shooting twice. Ammo is cheap. Your life is expensive.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Today: the 8th anniversary of 9/11

Re: [Bug 6196] FH_HELO_ENDS_DOT rule is overly aggressive in assigning a spam score

[Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>]

On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 17:02 -0400, Tom Pawlowski wrote:
> > In that case, you should have at least added the sender, too, not only
> > John and me. ;)  Anyway...
> 
> I think I did originally; well, replied to the original email that was
> sent, and received a bounceback from the bugzilla-daemon account. So I
> replied by hand. Should the reply-to have to been to
> dev@spamassassin.apache.org ?

No, there is only one way to add comments to bugzilla -- the web front-
end. Each bugzilla notification includes a handy link to the bug it
discusses, but it doesn't accept comments by mail.

The dev@ list I added, cause that's a list for development related
discussion, and also gets a copy of each bugzilla post.


> > Tom, please accept my apology -- you just caught me in a bad moment with
> > that, and I vented over a penny before really thinking a second time. I
> > should know better.
> 
> No biggie, lord knows I've been there more times than I can count.
> Hope your evening gets a little less annoying.
> 
> Take care,
> --T

-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}