You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@yunikorn.apache.org by "Craig Condit (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/09/07 16:20:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (YUNIKORN-1951) Queues with only max resource set shouldn't trigger preemption
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-1951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17762802#comment-17762802 ]
Craig Condit commented on YUNIKORN-1951:
----------------------------------------
I've updated the description with the real problem.
> Queues with only max resource set shouldn't trigger preemption
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YUNIKORN-1951
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-1951
> Project: Apache YuniKorn
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core - scheduler
> Reporter: Hsuan Zong Wu
> Assignee: Hsuan Zong Wu
> Priority: Major
>
> The function QueuePreemptionSnapshot.IsWithinGuaranteedResource() is used to verify that a queue can trigger preemption by checking that all used resources are within guarantees. Since not all resources may be specified in a guarantee, we (properly) ignore unspecified resources. For example, if only memory is set with a guarantee, then only memory is evaluated to determine if a queue is within guaranteed limits. Things like pods, cpu, ephemeral storage are not evaluated. So far so good.
> However, if no guarantees exist at all (on either the leaf queue or any parent of it), this logic results in the queue being *always* within guaranteed limits. This is incorrect. Instead, the queue should be made ineligible to trigger preemption.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@yunikorn.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@yunikorn.apache.org