Monitoring the effectiveness of anti-spam measures

[Ramon F Herrera <ra...@forcewise.com>]

Hello folks,

This is the 3rd. time that I attempt this post. First, I assumed that 
the mailing list was down. However, other messages are being distributed 
properly.

My current guess is that maybe a vigilant SA rule is considering my post 
suspicious?

Well, here is goes again, this time as an attachment.

TIA,

-Ramon

Re: Monitoring the effectiveness of anti-spam measures

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>]

>>On 01.10.19 08:50, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>>>This is the 3rd. time that I attempt this post. First, I assumed 
>>>that the mailing list was down. However, other messages are being 
>>>distributed properly.
>>>
>>>My current guess is that maybe a vigilant SA rule is considering 
>>>my post suspicious?

>On 10/1/2019 10:53 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>maybe just nobody did answer. Maybe you didn't post a question to be
>>answered?

On 01.10.19 11:05, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>I did not receive my copy and after that, I posted something else 
>without a problem.
>
>Then, I tried sending the same message for the 2nd. time: I received 
>nothing.
>
>The 3rd one, with the image attached worked.
>
>After this I will send the original message, as a test.

you can search in list archives if it's visible there:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/spamassassin/MailingLists

if not, the page mentions e-mail address where to post questions about mail
deliverability

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Fucking windows! Bring Bill Gates! (Southpark the movie)

Re: Monitoring the effectiveness of anti-spam measures

[Ramon F Herrera <ra...@forcewise.com>]

On 10/1/2019 10:53 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 01.10.19 08:50, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>> This is the 3rd. time that I attempt this post. First, I assumed that 
>> the mailing list was down. However, other messages are being 
>> distributed properly.
>>
>> My current guess is that maybe a vigilant SA rule is considering my 
>> post suspicious?
>
> maybe just nobody did answer. Maybe you didn't post a question to be
> answered?
>

Hi Mathus:

I did not receive my copy and after that, I posted something else 
without a problem.

Then, I tried sending the same message for the 2nd. time: I received 
nothing.

The 3rd one, with the image attached worked.

After this I will send the original message, as a test.

Thanks!

-Ramon

Re: Monitoring the effectiveness of anti-spam measures

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>]

On 01.10.19 08:50, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>This is the 3rd. time that I attempt this post. First, I assumed that 
>the mailing list was down. However, other messages are being 
>distributed properly.
>
>My current guess is that maybe a vigilant SA rule is considering my 
>post suspicious?

maybe just nobody did answer. Maybe you didn't post a question to be
answered?

>Well, here is goes again, this time as an attachment.

no, don't post attachments to the list.
if you need to send a spample, use pastebin.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I intend to live forever - so far so good.