You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Lucien Gentis <lu...@univ-lorraine.fr> on 2017/06/10 16:10:53 UTC
conflict number two
Hello again,
rewrite/flags.xml -2.4 :
. . . <p>In 2.4.26 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
rewrite/flags.xml - trunk :
in <section id="flag_b"> :
. . . <p>In 2.4.10 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
in <section id="flag_bnp"> :
sentence "<p>This flag is available in version 2.4.26 and later.</p>"
(present in 2.4 version) is missing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: conflict number two
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
I believe I misread the diff as saying that [B] wsa added in 2.4.26.
Please excuse the noise.
On 06/26/2017 03:06 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>
>
> Le 26/06/2017 à 20:48, Rich Bowen a écrit :
>>
>> On 06/26/2017 02:37 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> Le 10/06/2017 à 18:10, Lucien Gentis a écrit :
>>>> Hello again,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> rewrite/flags.xml -2.4 :
>>>>
>>>> . . . <p>In 2.4.26 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> rewrite/flags.xml - trunk :
>>>>
>>>> in <section id="flag_b"> :
>>>>
>>>> . . . <p>In 2.4.10 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
>>
>>> Fixed in r1799968
>> Did you verify which one of these assertions was correct?
>>
>
> Yes, I did the backport proposal in r1795850 and it was backported in
> r1796850.
>
> CJ
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
>
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: conflict number two
Posted by Marion & Christophe JAILLET <ch...@wanadoo.fr>.
Le 26/06/2017 à 20:48, Rich Bowen a écrit :
>
> On 06/26/2017 02:37 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> Le 10/06/2017 à 18:10, Lucien Gentis a écrit :
>>> Hello again,
>>>
>>>
>>> rewrite/flags.xml -2.4 :
>>>
>>> . . . <p>In 2.4.26 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
>>>
>>>
>>> rewrite/flags.xml - trunk :
>>>
>>> in <section id="flag_b"> :
>>>
>>> . . . <p>In 2.4.10 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
>
>> Fixed in r1799968
> Did you verify which one of these assertions was correct?
>
Yes, I did the backport proposal in r1795850 and it was backported in
r1796850.
CJ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: conflict number two
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On 06/26/2017 02:37 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 10/06/2017 à 18:10, Lucien Gentis a écrit :
>> Hello again,
>>
>>
>> rewrite/flags.xml -2.4 :
>>
>> . . . <p>In 2.4.26 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
>>
>>
>> rewrite/flags.xml - trunk :
>>
>> in <section id="flag_b"> :
>>
>> . . . <p>In 2.4.10 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
> Fixed in r1799968
Did you verify which one of these assertions was correct?
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: conflict number two
Posted by Christophe JAILLET <ch...@wanadoo.fr>.
Le 10/06/2017 à 18:10, Lucien Gentis a écrit :
> Hello again,
>
>
> rewrite/flags.xml -2.4 :
>
> . . . <p>In 2.4.26 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
>
>
> rewrite/flags.xml - trunk :
>
> in <section id="flag_b"> :
>
> . . . <p>In 2.4.10 and later, you can limit the escaping . . .
>
>
> in <section id="flag_bnp"> :
>
> sentence "<p>This flag is available in version 2.4.26 and later.</p>"
> (present in 2.4 version) is missing.
Fixed in r1799968
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org