You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Michael Osipov <mi...@apache.org> on 2018/06/10 08:32:18 UTC
Second MNG-6344
Folks,
who seconds MNG-6344 (Guice upgrade) for 3.5.4? All ITs pass.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Second MNG-6344
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Sun 10 Jun 2018 at 09:32, Michael Osipov <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> who seconds MNG-6344 (Guice upgrade) for 3.5.4? All ITs pass.
>
>
> Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
> --
Sent from my phone
Re: Second MNG-6344
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <mc...@gmail.com>.
I posted some background why Maven currently uses the no-AOP build in
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/169#issuecomment-396177378
On 10 June 2018 at 19:42, Michael Osipov <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Am 2018-06-10 um 15:45 schrieb Robert Scholte:
>
>> I'm a bit worried about the no_aop drop. I'm pretty sure Stuart would
>> have noticed this in the past.
>> I'm very proud we can say that even Maven 3.0 still runs on the latest
>> JDK version, introducing bytecode parsers like ASM might block this benefit
>> with future versions. Don't think we need it.
>>
>
> I did not drop the no_aop. I upgraded just the version.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
Re: Second MNG-6344
Posted by Michael Osipov <mi...@apache.org>.
Am 2018-06-10 um 15:45 schrieb Robert Scholte:
> I'm a bit worried about the no_aop drop. I'm pretty sure Stuart would
> have noticed this in the past.
> I'm very proud we can say that even Maven 3.0 still runs on the latest
> JDK version, introducing bytecode parsers like ASM might block this
> benefit with future versions. Don't think we need it.
I did not drop the no_aop. I upgraded just the version.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Second MNG-6344
Posted by Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>.
I'm a bit worried about the no_aop drop. I'm pretty sure Stuart would have
noticed this in the past.
I'm very proud we can say that even Maven 3.0 still runs on the latest JDK
version, introducing bytecode parsers like ASM might block this benefit
with future versions. Don't think we need it.
Robert
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 10:32:18 +0200, Michael Osipov <mi...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> who seconds MNG-6344 (Guice upgrade) for 3.5.4? All ITs pass.
>
>
> Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org