You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to woden-dev@ws.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> on 2006/02/16 18:10:15 UTC
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Woden folks,
any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> - Dan
>
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write schemas
> > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> >
> > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when patches/fixes
> > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> >
> > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > commons-dev@ws now?
> >
> > - Dan
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions LLC
> http://envoisolutions.com
> http://netzooid.com/blog
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Take a look at
http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/api/javax/xml/transform/URIResolver.html
and
http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xni/org/apache/xerces/xni/parser/XMLEntityResolver.html
These interfaces allow clients to customize resource resolution within
Xerces.
Lawrence Mandel
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
02/16/2006 12:39 PM
Please respond to
general
To
general@ws.apache.org
cc
woden-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, commons-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
could you please point me to how it is being done in other java
projects? (someone hinted at xerces)
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. But not immediately.
>
> I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we
plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
>
> Lawrence Mandel
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>
> 02/16/2006 12:10 PM
>
> Please respond to
> woden-dev
>
>
> To general@ws.apache.org
>
> cc commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org,
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Subject Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Woden folks,
>
> any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> > - Dan
> >
> > Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write
schemas
> > > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> > >
> > > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when
patches/fixes
> > > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> > >
> > > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > > commons-dev@ws now?
> > >
> > > - Dan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions LLC
> > http://envoisolutions.com
> > http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Take a look at
http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/api/javax/xml/transform/URIResolver.html
and
http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xni/org/apache/xerces/xni/parser/XMLEntityResolver.html
These interfaces allow clients to customize resource resolution within
Xerces.
Lawrence Mandel
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
02/16/2006 12:39 PM
Please respond to
general
To
general@ws.apache.org
cc
woden-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, commons-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
could you please point me to how it is being done in other java
projects? (someone hinted at xerces)
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. But not immediately.
>
> I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we
plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
>
> Lawrence Mandel
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>
> 02/16/2006 12:10 PM
>
> Please respond to
> woden-dev
>
>
> To general@ws.apache.org
>
> cc commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org,
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Subject Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Woden folks,
>
> any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> > - Dan
> >
> > Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write
schemas
> > > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> > >
> > > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when
patches/fixes
> > > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> > >
> > > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > > commons-dev@ws now?
> > >
> > > - Dan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions LLC
> > http://envoisolutions.com
> > http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Take a look at
http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/api/javax/xml/transform/URIResolver.html
and
http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xni/org/apache/xerces/xni/parser/XMLEntityResolver.html
These interfaces allow clients to customize resource resolution within
Xerces.
Lawrence Mandel
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
02/16/2006 12:39 PM
Please respond to
general
To
general@ws.apache.org
cc
woden-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, commons-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
could you please point me to how it is being done in other java
projects? (someone hinted at xerces)
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. But not immediately.
>
> I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we
plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
>
> Lawrence Mandel
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>
> 02/16/2006 12:10 PM
>
> Please respond to
> woden-dev
>
>
> To general@ws.apache.org
>
> cc commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org,
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Subject Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Woden folks,
>
> any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> > - Dan
> >
> > Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write
schemas
> > > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> > >
> > > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when
patches/fixes
> > > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> > >
> > > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > > commons-dev@ws now?
> > >
> > > - Dan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions LLC
> > http://envoisolutions.com
> > http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
could you please point me to how it is being done in other java
projects? (someone hinted at xerces)
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. But not immediately.
>
> I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
>
> Lawrence Mandel
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>
> 02/16/2006 12:10 PM
>
> Please respond to
> woden-dev
>
>
> To general@ws.apache.org
>
> cc commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Subject Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Woden folks,
>
> any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> > - Dan
> >
> > Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write schemas
> > > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> > >
> > > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when patches/fixes
> > > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> > >
> > > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > > commons-dev@ws now?
> > >
> > > - Dan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions LLC
> > http://envoisolutions.com
> > http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
could you please point me to how it is being done in other java
projects? (someone hinted at xerces)
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. But not immediately.
>
> I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
>
> Lawrence Mandel
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>
> 02/16/2006 12:10 PM
>
> Please respond to
> woden-dev
>
>
> To general@ws.apache.org
>
> cc commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Subject Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Woden folks,
>
> any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> > - Dan
> >
> > Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write schemas
> > > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> > >
> > > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when patches/fixes
> > > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> > >
> > > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > > commons-dev@ws now?
> > >
> > > - Dan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions LLC
> > http://envoisolutions.com
> > http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
could you please point me to how it is being done in other java
projects? (someone hinted at xerces)
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. But not immediately.
>
> I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
>
> Lawrence Mandel
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>
> 02/16/2006 12:10 PM
>
> Please respond to
> woden-dev
>
>
> To general@ws.apache.org
>
> cc commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Subject Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Woden folks,
>
> any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> > - Dan
> >
> > Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write schemas
> > > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> > >
> > > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when patches/fixes
> > > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> > >
> > > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > > commons-dev@ws now?
> > >
> > > - Dan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions LLC
> > http://envoisolutions.com
> > http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
could you please point me to how it is being done in other java
projects? (someone hinted at xerces)
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. But not immediately.
>
> I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
>
> Lawrence Mandel
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>
> 02/16/2006 12:10 PM
>
> Please respond to
> woden-dev
>
>
> To general@ws.apache.org
>
> cc commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Subject Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Woden folks,
>
> any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> > - Dan
> >
> > Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write schemas
> > > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> > >
> > > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when patches/fixes
> > > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> > >
> > > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > > commons-dev@ws now?
> > >
> > > - Dan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions LLC
> > http://envoisolutions.com
> > http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Yes. But not immediately.
I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we
plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
Lawrence Mandel
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
02/16/2006 12:10 PM
Please respond to
woden-dev
To
general@ws.apache.org
cc
commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Woden folks,
any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> - Dan
>
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write schemas
> > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> >
> > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when patches/fixes
> > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> >
> > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > commons-dev@ws now?
> >
> > - Dan
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions LLC
> http://envoisolutions.com
> http://netzooid.com/blog
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Yes. But not immediately.
I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we
plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
Lawrence Mandel
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
02/16/2006 12:10 PM
Please respond to
woden-dev
To
general@ws.apache.org
cc
commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Woden folks,
any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> - Dan
>
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write schemas
> > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> >
> > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when patches/fixes
> > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> >
> > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > commons-dev@ws now?
> >
> > - Dan
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions LLC
> http://envoisolutions.com
> http://netzooid.com/blog
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Yes. But not immediately.
I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we
plan the release including defining the requirements and a time line.
Lawrence Mandel
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
02/16/2006 12:10 PM
Please respond to
woden-dev
To
general@ws.apache.org
cc
commons-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited
Woden folks,
any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff?
thanks,
dims
On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen??
> - Dan
>
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write schemas
> > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it
> > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI
> > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only
> > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-)
> >
> > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a
> > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when patches/fixes
> > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!)
> >
> > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to
> > commons-dev@ws now?
> >
> > - Dan
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions LLC
> http://envoisolutions.com
> http://netzooid.com/blog
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org