[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6917) Move NumericField out of core to backwards-codecs

["Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-6917:
---------------------------------------
    Attachment: LUCENE-6917.patch

This is mostly a "rote" rename, except there was some hair involved because I moved {{precisionStep}} and {{NumericType}} out of core's {{FieldType}} and down into the {{XXXField}} themselves.

This also required adding some deps on modules to {{backward-codecs}}, though I was able to cutover at least {{lucene/demo}}'s usage to dimensional values ...

> Move NumericField out of core to backwards-codecs
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6917
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 6.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6917.patch
>
>
> DimensionalValues seems to be better across the board (indexing time, indexing size, search-speed, search-time heap required) than NumericField, at least in my testing so far.
> I think for 6.0 we should move {{IntField}}, {{LongField}}, {{FloatField}}, {{DoubleField}} and {{NumericRangeQuery}} to {{backward-codecs}}, and rename with {{Legacy}} prefix?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org