You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Andi Vajda <va...@osafoundation.org> on 2011/03/27 23:26:52 UTC
building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Hi,
It seems that at this time, the HEAD of branch_3x can no longer be
conveniently checked out with Lucene sources only.
If I check out http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene
I'm not getting the common-build.xml file from above that the Lucene one
depends on. If I checkout branch_3x, I get Solr sources as well.
Is this intentional or an oversight ?
Andi..
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
I would rather not rebuild for L-2996. This issue has a known workaround. As for the sources issue that Andi brought up, it never effected 3.1 b/c it doesn't have the validation stuff.
I'd like to stick w/ the artifacts we have.
On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> If you're talking about LUCENE-2996, then note that I haven't checked in the code yet. If you're going to rebuild the artifacts off of branches/lucene_solr_3_1, I can check in the code there now.
>
> Shai
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's
> > addIndexes() fix, too?
> >
>
> 3.1 branch is fine with regards to this issue, thats why I raised my
> question... it seems only the 3.1 release branch was "fixed" for this
> but trunk and branch_3x are broken.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Posted by Shai Erera <se...@gmail.com>.
If you're talking about LUCENE-2996, then note that I haven't checked in the
code yet. If you're going to rebuild the artifacts off of
branches/lucene_solr_3_1, I can check in the code there now.
Shai
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's
> > addIndexes() fix, too?
> >
>
> 3.1 branch is fine with regards to this issue, thats why I raised my
> question... it seems only the 3.1 release branch was "fixed" for this
> but trunk and branch_3x are broken.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
RE: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
OK, sorry, I misunderstood the thread.
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:05 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's
> > addIndexes() fix, too?
> >
>
> 3.1 branch is fine with regards to this issue, thats why I raised my question...
> it seems only the 3.1 release branch was "fixed" for this but trunk and
> branch_3x are broken.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Posted by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's
> addIndexes() fix, too?
>
3.1 branch is fine with regards to this issue, thats why I raised my
question... it seems only the 3.1 release branch was "fixed" for this
but trunk and branch_3x are broken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
RE: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Hi,
If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's
addIndexes() fix, too?
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsingers@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 2:51 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: Andi Vajda
> Subject: Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
>
> I don't think it is lost, it's likely my mistake in adding a top level
common-build
> for the validation stuff. We can change it out.
>
> On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
>
> > the real question is: why is this fixed only in the 3.1 branch?
> >
> > how did our 3.1 branch and 3.x/trunk get so different? I don't like
> > that any work done to get 3.1 out the door is going to be "lost" and
> > have to be re-done.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Andi Vajda <va...@osafoundation.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It seems that at this time, the HEAD of branch_3x can no longer be
> >> conveniently checked out with Lucene sources only.
> >>
> >> If I check out
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene
> >> I'm not getting the common-build.xml file from above that the Lucene
> >> one depends on. If I checkout branch_3x, I get Solr sources as well.
> >>
> >> Is this intentional or an oversight ?
> >>
> >> Andi..
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
I don't think it is lost, it's likely my mistake in adding a top level common-build for the validation stuff. We can change it out.
On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> the real question is: why is this fixed only in the 3.1 branch?
>
> how did our 3.1 branch and 3.x/trunk get so different? I don't like
> that any work done to get 3.1 out the door is going to be "lost" and
> have to be re-done.
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Andi Vajda <va...@osafoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems that at this time, the HEAD of branch_3x can no longer be
>> conveniently checked out with Lucene sources only.
>>
>> If I check out
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene
>> I'm not getting the common-build.xml file from above that the Lucene one
>> depends on. If I checkout branch_3x, I get Solr sources as well.
>>
>> Is this intentional or an oversight ?
>>
>> Andi..
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: building Lucene from sources without Solr sources from svn ?
Posted by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com>.
the real question is: why is this fixed only in the 3.1 branch?
how did our 3.1 branch and 3.x/trunk get so different? I don't like
that any work done to get 3.1 out the door is going to be "lost" and
have to be re-done.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Andi Vajda <va...@osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that at this time, the HEAD of branch_3x can no longer be
> conveniently checked out with Lucene sources only.
>
> If I check out
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene
> I'm not getting the common-build.xml file from above that the Lucene one
> depends on. If I checkout branch_3x, I get Solr sources as well.
>
> Is this intentional or an oversight ?
>
> Andi..
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org