You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to woden-dev@ws.apache.org by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> on 2006/02/06 17:39:46 UTC
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
John Kaputin and I have found a few problems in XmlSchema while developing
Woden [1]. We've fixed some but do have some outstanding issues such as
adding a URI resolver framework and clearly defining an XmlSchema API
capable of both reading and writing schemas. I'd be in favour of creating
a 1.0 release plan with goals to resolve some of the major issues adopter
projects such as Woden have as opposed to just declaring the current state
as 1.0.
Lawrence Mandel
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/woden
Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>
02/06/2006 11:05 AM
Please respond to
general
To
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
general@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
I will see if I can get some tests whipped up this week. But, I would
like to point out that this code has been tested. While not via unit
tests, it is used in Axis, XFire, and other projects - which says
something about its stability IMO. So I would be more in favor of doing
a 1.0 and then a 1.1 later.
- Dan
Glen Daniels wrote:
> +1 for getting an XmlSchema release going.
>
> I'd like to see a few more test cases, ideally, before going out the
> door. How about doing a beta cycle, so we have a little time to try to
> freshen up the tests and also to get some feedback from anyone
> interested before "really" going 1.0? I'd propose releasing
> XmlSchema-1.0-beta-1 and giving people a little time (couple of weeks?)
> to wake up and try it out while we add a few more tests... Then we can
> do 1.0 proper after that.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Glen
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 12:23 PM
>> To: commons-dev@ws.apache.org
>> Cc: general@ws.apache.org; axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
>>
>> Haha... We *have* been bashing to code. I've submitted a
>> couple patches and I know another XFire guy, Mika, has as
>> well. I would gladly do the release/announcements/etc if I
>> had karma... *cough* Are there some non-karma things that I
>> can do? I know there is one outstanding issue in JIRA, but I
>> don't see much holding us back beyond that.
>>
>> - Dan
>>
>> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 10:15 -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> Can we do some kind of release of the XmlSchema stuff? 1.0-M1?
>>>> 1.0-beta-1? We could even call it 1.0 I suppose as its
>>>>
>> been around a
>>
>>>> while...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> +1 for doing a 1.0 of XmlSchema. Dan, can we rope you into
>>>
>> help bash
>>
>>> +the
>>> release into shape? ;-)
>>>
>>> I assume next you're going to help get Axiom into 1.0 .. and then
>>> Axis2? ;-) Ok ok now I'm jumping too far but let's start
>>>
>> with XmlSchema!
>>
>>> Sanjiva.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Dan Diephouse
>> Envoi Solutions LLC
>> http://envoisolutions.com
>> http://netzooid.com/blog
>>
>>
>>
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
But of course. : ) Just sounded like XmlSchema 1.0 was going to be
declared based on the current code base and without any planning. I think
there should be a plan in place for the release so anyone that wants to
put in fixes or needs to put in enhancements has a time line defined.
Lawrence Mandel
Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>
02/07/2006 09:28 PM
Please respond to
woden-dev
To
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
general@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:39 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> John Kaputin and I have found a few problems in XmlSchema while
developing
> Woden [1]. We've fixed some but do have some outstanding issues such as
> adding a URI resolver framework and clearly defining an XmlSchema API
> capable of both reading and writing schemas. I'd be in favour of
creating
> a 1.0 release plan with goals to resolve some of the major issues
adopter
> projects such as Woden have as opposed to just declaring the current
state
> as 1.0.
Can you guys help fix the problems please? I suggest opening up the
needed JIRAs, marking them as blockers for 1.0, fixing them and then
closing the issues :-).
Axis2 has been doing that for things that we've found .. and now Dan's
doing that for things he has found. So if everyone does their bit this
critical common component will become a reality!
Sanjiva.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
But of course. : ) Just sounded like XmlSchema 1.0 was going to be
declared based on the current code base and without any planning. I think
there should be a plan in place for the release so anyone that wants to
put in fixes or needs to put in enhancements has a time line defined.
Lawrence Mandel
Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>
02/07/2006 09:28 PM
Please respond to
woden-dev
To
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
general@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:39 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> John Kaputin and I have found a few problems in XmlSchema while
developing
> Woden [1]. We've fixed some but do have some outstanding issues such as
> adding a URI resolver framework and clearly defining an XmlSchema API
> capable of both reading and writing schemas. I'd be in favour of
creating
> a 1.0 release plan with goals to resolve some of the major issues
adopter
> projects such as Woden have as opposed to just declaring the current
state
> as 1.0.
Can you guys help fix the problems please? I suggest opening up the
needed JIRAs, marking them as blockers for 1.0, fixing them and then
closing the issues :-).
Axis2 has been doing that for things that we've found .. and now Dan's
doing that for things he has found. So if everyone does their bit this
critical common component will become a reality!
Sanjiva.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
But of course. : ) Just sounded like XmlSchema 1.0 was going to be
declared based on the current code base and without any planning. I think
there should be a plan in place for the release so anyone that wants to
put in fixes or needs to put in enhancements has a time line defined.
Lawrence Mandel
Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>
02/07/2006 09:28 PM
Please respond to
woden-dev
To
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
general@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org, axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:39 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> John Kaputin and I have found a few problems in XmlSchema while
developing
> Woden [1]. We've fixed some but do have some outstanding issues such as
> adding a URI resolver framework and clearly defining an XmlSchema API
> capable of both reading and writing schemas. I'd be in favour of
creating
> a 1.0 release plan with goals to resolve some of the major issues
adopter
> projects such as Woden have as opposed to just declaring the current
state
> as 1.0.
Can you guys help fix the problems please? I suggest opening up the
needed JIRAs, marking them as blockers for 1.0, fixing them and then
closing the issues :-).
Axis2 has been doing that for things that we've found .. and now Dan's
doing that for things he has found. So if everyone does their bit this
critical common component will become a reality!
Sanjiva.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:39 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> John Kaputin and I have found a few problems in XmlSchema while developing
> Woden [1]. We've fixed some but do have some outstanding issues such as
> adding a URI resolver framework and clearly defining an XmlSchema API
> capable of both reading and writing schemas. I'd be in favour of creating
> a 1.0 release plan with goals to resolve some of the major issues adopter
> projects such as Woden have as opposed to just declaring the current state
> as 1.0.
Can you guys help fix the problems please? I suggest opening up the
needed JIRAs, marking them as blockers for 1.0, fixing them and then
closing the issues :-).
Axis2 has been doing that for things that we've found .. and now Dan's
doing that for things he has found. So if everyone does their bit this
critical common component will become a reality!
Sanjiva.
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:39 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> John Kaputin and I have found a few problems in XmlSchema while developing
> Woden [1]. We've fixed some but do have some outstanding issues such as
> adding a URI resolver framework and clearly defining an XmlSchema API
> capable of both reading and writing schemas. I'd be in favour of creating
> a 1.0 release plan with goals to resolve some of the major issues adopter
> projects such as Woden have as opposed to just declaring the current state
> as 1.0.
Can you guys help fix the problems please? I suggest opening up the
needed JIRAs, marking them as blockers for 1.0, fixing them and then
closing the issues :-).
Axis2 has been doing that for things that we've found .. and now Dan's
doing that for things he has found. So if everyone does their bit this
critical common component will become a reality!
Sanjiva.
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:39 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> John Kaputin and I have found a few problems in XmlSchema while developing
> Woden [1]. We've fixed some but do have some outstanding issues such as
> adding a URI resolver framework and clearly defining an XmlSchema API
> capable of both reading and writing schemas. I'd be in favour of creating
> a 1.0 release plan with goals to resolve some of the major issues adopter
> projects such as Woden have as opposed to just declaring the current state
> as 1.0.
Can you guys help fix the problems please? I suggest opening up the
needed JIRAs, marking them as blockers for 1.0, fixing them and then
closing the issues :-).
Axis2 has been doing that for things that we've found .. and now Dan's
doing that for things he has found. So if everyone does their bit this
critical common component will become a reality!
Sanjiva.
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:39 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> John Kaputin and I have found a few problems in XmlSchema while developing
> Woden [1]. We've fixed some but do have some outstanding issues such as
> adding a URI resolver framework and clearly defining an XmlSchema API
> capable of both reading and writing schemas. I'd be in favour of creating
> a 1.0 release plan with goals to resolve some of the major issues adopter
> projects such as Woden have as opposed to just declaring the current state
> as 1.0.
Can you guys help fix the problems please? I suggest opening up the
needed JIRAs, marking them as blockers for 1.0, fixing them and then
closing the issues :-).
Axis2 has been doing that for things that we've found .. and now Dan's
doing that for things he has found. So if everyone does their bit this
critical common component will become a reality!
Sanjiva.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org