[Bug 70025] AccessFileName Directive: Outdated regarding AllowOverride

[bu...@apache.org]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70025

Rich Bowen <rb...@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #1 from Rich Bowen <rb...@apache.org> ---
So, if I am understanding this, your concern is that this document suggests
that it's set to All by default, when it is in fact set to None, yes?

Meanwhile, we frequently see in the wild instances where people have gone into
the main config and set it to All for <Directory /> "for convenience", and
that's what this is cautioning against.

Could you perhaps suggest phrasing that covers both eventualities? The goal of
the documentation is to promote best practice, and this comment in the doc is
to make people aware of the cost of setting this directive to something other
than the default value.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org