You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/04/17 19:17:00 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8217] New: -
Documentation references "workers." prefix
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8217>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8217
Documentation references "workers." prefix
Summary: Documentation references "workers." prefix
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: Nightly Build
Platform: Other
URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-
doc/config/jk.html
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Major
Priority: Other
Component: Connector:JK/AJP (deprecated)
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: dlr@finemaltcoding.com
Both the documentation at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/jk.html and that in
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/docs/ from CVS HEAD makes a conflicting references
to both a "workers." (plural) and "worker." (singular) prefix for configuration
parameter names. Looking through the source, it seems like the latter is
correct (see PREFIX_OF_WORKER #define at jk_util.c:81). This is extremely
confusing and should be fixed. I'm willing to submit a patch if someone can
give me a definitive answer on this.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>