You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Eugene Koontz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/09/04 22:44:07 UTC
[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-1547) Improve robustness of client
using Sasl in the presence of dropped requests
Eugene Koontz created ZOOKEEPER-1547:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Improve robustness of client using Sasl in the presence of dropped requests
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1547
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1547
Project: ZooKeeper
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Eugene Koontz
ZK clients send SASL packets to ZK servers as request packets. However, what if the server does not responds to the client's SASL packets with responses? The server does not actually close the connection to the client, it simply fails to respond to SASL requests. Make sure the client can cope with this behavior.
Background:
In ZOOKEEPER-1437, Ben writes:
"[I]t would be great to add a test that simply drops responses to clients without closing connections."
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13447477&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13447477
Also in ZOOKEEPER-1437 Rakesh writes: "I could see DisconnectableZooKeeper.disconnect() has network delays/partition simulation logic."
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13445704&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13445704
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1547) Test robustness of client using
Sasl in the presence of dropped requests
Posted by "Eugene Koontz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Eugene Koontz updated ZOOKEEPER-1547:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Test robustness of client using Sasl in the presence of dropped requests (was: Improve robustness of client using Sasl in the presence of dropped requests)
> Test robustness of client using Sasl in the presence of dropped requests
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1547
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1547
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Eugene Koontz
>
> ZK clients send SASL packets to ZK servers as request packets. However, what if the server does not responds to the client's SASL packets with responses? The server does not actually close the connection to the client, it simply fails to respond to SASL requests. Make sure the client can cope with this behavior.
> Background:
> In ZOOKEEPER-1437, Ben writes:
> "[I]t would be great to add a test that simply drops responses to clients without closing connections."
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13447477&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13447477
> Also in ZOOKEEPER-1437 Rakesh writes: "I could see DisconnectableZooKeeper.disconnect() has network delays/partition simulation logic."
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13445704&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13445704
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1547) Test robustness of client using
SASL in the presence of dropped requests
Posted by "Eugene Koontz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Eugene Koontz updated ZOOKEEPER-1547:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Test robustness of client using SASL in the presence of dropped requests (was: Test robustness of client using Sasl in the presence of dropped requests)
> Test robustness of client using SASL in the presence of dropped requests
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1547
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1547
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Eugene Koontz
>
> ZK clients send SASL packets to ZK servers as request packets. However, what if the server does not responds to the client's SASL packets with responses? The server does not actually close the connection to the client, it simply fails to respond to SASL requests. Make sure the client can cope with this behavior.
> Background:
> In ZOOKEEPER-1437, Ben writes:
> "[I]t would be great to add a test that simply drops responses to clients without closing connections."
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13447477&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13447477
> Also in ZOOKEEPER-1437 Rakesh writes: "I could see DisconnectableZooKeeper.disconnect() has network delays/partition simulation logic."
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13445704&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13445704
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1547) Test robustness of client using
SASL in the presence of dropped requests
Posted by "Eugene Koontz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Eugene Koontz updated ZOOKEEPER-1547:
-------------------------------------
Description:
ZK clients send SASL packets to ZK servers as request packets. However, what if the server does not responds to the client's SASL packets with responses? In this scenario, the server does not actually close the connection to the client, it simply fails to respond to SASL requests. Make sure the client can cope with this behavior.
Background:
In ZOOKEEPER-1437, Ben writes:
"[I]t would be great to add a test that simply drops responses to clients without closing connections."
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13447477&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13447477
Also in ZOOKEEPER-1437 Rakesh writes: "I could see DisconnectableZooKeeper.disconnect() has network delays/partition simulation logic."
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13445704&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13445704
was:
ZK clients send SASL packets to ZK servers as request packets. However, what if the server does not responds to the client's SASL packets with responses? The server does not actually close the connection to the client, it simply fails to respond to SASL requests. Make sure the client can cope with this behavior.
Background:
In ZOOKEEPER-1437, Ben writes:
"[I]t would be great to add a test that simply drops responses to clients without closing connections."
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13447477&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13447477
Also in ZOOKEEPER-1437 Rakesh writes: "I could see DisconnectableZooKeeper.disconnect() has network delays/partition simulation logic."
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13445704&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13445704
> Test robustness of client using SASL in the presence of dropped requests
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1547
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1547
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Eugene Koontz
>
> ZK clients send SASL packets to ZK servers as request packets. However, what if the server does not responds to the client's SASL packets with responses? In this scenario, the server does not actually close the connection to the client, it simply fails to respond to SASL requests. Make sure the client can cope with this behavior.
> Background:
> In ZOOKEEPER-1437, Ben writes:
> "[I]t would be great to add a test that simply drops responses to clients without closing connections."
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13447477&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13447477
> Also in ZOOKEEPER-1437 Rakesh writes: "I could see DisconnectableZooKeeper.disconnect() has network delays/partition simulation logic."
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?focusedCommentId=13445704&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13445704
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira