You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/12/02 15:08:20 UTC
[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2103) NoLockFactory should have a private
constructor
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-2103:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> NoLockFactory should have a private constructor
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2103
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2103
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> NoLockFactory documents in its javadocs that one should use the static getNoLockFactory() method. However the class does not declare a private empty constructor, which breaks its Singleton purpose. We cannot add the empty private constructor because that'd break break-compat (even though I think it's very low chance someone actually instantiates the class), therefore we'll add a @deprecated warning to the class about this, and add the method in 4.0. I personally prefer to add an empty constructor w/ the @deprecated method, but am fine either way.
> Don't know if a patch is needed, as this is a trivial change.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org