You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@superset.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/11/17 02:36:40 UTC

[GitHub] [superset] michael-s-molina commented on issue #21385: [SIP-93] Proposal for non-blocking SQL Lab persistence

michael-s-molina commented on issue #21385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/21385#issuecomment-1317975891

   Interesting idea @justinpark . I wonder if we should provide both sync and async persistence options or just provide the async version as the evolution of the feature. If it's the latter, we could reuse the same feature flag given that we're planning to clean up the current state, which will modify the existing feature anyway.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@superset.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@superset.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-help@superset.apache.org