Re: mod_perl beginners list

[Matt Sergeant <ma...@sergeant.org>]

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Mark Maunder wrote:

> Is there any interest in creating a mod_perl beginners list to make the
> technology more accessable? I could dedicate some of my time to supporting it
> and perhaps we can round up a few other volunteers. I think the content of the
> main list may intimidate newcomers into not posting 'getting started' type
> questions like 'is there a module that does X?' and compilation issues and
> getting up and running with some basic handlers or registry scripts. I've
> noticed alot of posts on the perl beginners list that should/could have been
> posted to mod_perl, but may have been considered too newbie.
>
> thoughts?

Can we argue about which template system is best there? I'd join if we
could. ;-)

-- 
<!-- Matt -->
<:->Get a smart net</:->

Re: mod_perl beginners list

[Jon Robison <jr...@uniphied.com>]

Yeah! And can we also have a vi vs. emacs fight too?

<-- snorting with childish fits and giggles.

I'd be there with bells on, as I am one of those "newbies" who STILL has
trouble figuring out when to return FORBIDDEN, DONE or OK.!

--Jon Robison

P.S. We should add Komodo to that editor fight - I hate things that
started in the Windows world, but for an on-the-fly "hey your syntax
sucks" tell-you-its-wrong-as-you-write-it editor, it's pretty good.



Matt Sergeant wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Mark Maunder wrote:
> 
> > Is there any interest in creating a mod_perl beginners list to make the
> > technology more accessable? I could dedicate some of my time to supporting it
> > and perhaps we can round up a few other volunteers. I think the content of the
> > main list may intimidate newcomers into not posting 'getting started' type
> > questions like 'is there a module that does X?' and compilation issues and
> > getting up and running with some basic handlers or registry scripts. I've
> > noticed alot of posts on the perl beginners list that should/could have been
> > posted to mod_perl, but may have been considered too newbie.
> >
> > thoughts?
> 
> Can we argue about which template system is best there? I'd join if we
> could. ;-)
> 
> --
> <!-- Matt -->
> <:->Get a smart net</:->

Re: mod_perl beginners list

[Gunther Birznieks <gu...@extropia.com>]

At 10:19 PM 1/15/2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Mark Maunder wrote:
>
> > Is there any interest in creating a mod_perl beginners list to make the
> > technology more accessable? I could dedicate some of my time to 
> supporting it
> > and perhaps we can round up a few other volunteers. I think the content 
> of the
> > main list may intimidate newcomers into not posting 'getting started' type
> > questions like 'is there a module that does X?' and compilation issues and
> > getting up and running with some basic handlers or registry scripts. I've
> > noticed alot of posts on the perl beginners list that should/could have 
> been
> > posted to mod_perl, but may have been considered too newbie.
> >
> > thoughts?
>
>Can we argue about which template system is best there? I'd join if we
>could. ;-)

Why because then you'd argue on behalf of AxKit? :)