You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Manu George <ma...@gmail.com> on 2008/10/03 12:44:08 UTC

Container Type of SingletonContainer.

Hi,
        The SingletonContainer has a type STATELESS. Shouldn't we have
another type for singleton?

Regards
Manu

Re: Container Type of SingletonContainer.

Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Oct 7, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Manu George wrote:

> Well I caught it because I was grouping the containers via type in the
> portlet i am developing for geronimo. So the singleton container
> appears under stateless containers.

Aha!  Nice.

-David

>
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:50 AM, David Blevins  
> <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Manu George wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>      The SingletonContainer has a type STATELESS. Shouldn't we have
>>> another type for singleton?
>>>
>>
>> Good catch.  Seems that property of the container is only used for  
>> logging
>> on startup so it was missed.  Will have to make a mental note of  
>> that for
>> next time.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>

Re: Container Type of SingletonContainer.

Posted by Manu George <ma...@gmail.com>.
Well I caught it because I was grouping the containers via type in the
portlet i am developing for geronimo. So the singleton container
appears under stateless containers.

Regards
Manu

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:50 AM, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Manu George wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>       The SingletonContainer has a type STATELESS. Shouldn't we have
>> another type for singleton?
>>
>
> Good catch.  Seems that property of the container is only used for logging
> on startup so it was missed.  Will have to make a mental note of that for
> next time.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -David
>
>

Re: Container Type of SingletonContainer.

Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Manu George wrote:

> Hi,
>        The SingletonContainer has a type STATELESS. Shouldn't we have
> another type for singleton?
>

Good catch.  Seems that property of the container is only used for  
logging on startup so it was missed.  Will have to make a mental note  
of that for next time.

Thanks!

-David