You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Luther Baker <lu...@gmail.com> on 2009/12/03 19:07:05 UTC
Apache License in the Prototype
Not a huge thing but would it make sense to remove the <licenses> ... entry
from the wicket prototype?
<licenses>
<license>
<name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
<url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
<distribution>repo</distribution>
</license>
</licenses>
Luckily, I stumbled across this before committing but I was close to
publishing a new project to an GPL3 repository and this pom entry would have
been confusing.
Per the Maven pom guidelines <http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Licenses>:
*Note that a project should list only licenses that may apply directly to
this project, and not list licenses that apply to this project's
dependencies.*
Again, no biggie. Maybe it is no big deal.
-Luther
Re: Apache License in the Prototype
Posted by Martin Makundi <ma...@koodaripalvelut.com>.
patch proposal ...
2009/12/3 Luther Baker <lu...@gmail.com>:
> Not a huge thing but would it make sense to remove the <licenses> ... entry
> from the wicket prototype?
>
> <licenses>
> <license>
> <name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
> <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
> <distribution>repo</distribution>
> </license>
> </licenses>
>
> Luckily, I stumbled across this before committing but I was close to
> publishing a new project to an GPL3 repository and this pom entry would have
> been confusing.
>
> Per the Maven pom guidelines <http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Licenses>:
>
> *Note that a project should list only licenses that may apply directly to
> this project, and not list licenses that apply to this project's
> dependencies.*
>
> Again, no biggie. Maybe it is no big deal.
>
> -Luther
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Apache License in the Prototype
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
jira issue...
-igor
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Luther Baker <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not a huge thing but would it make sense to remove the <licenses> ... entry
> from the wicket prototype?
>
> <licenses>
> <license>
> <name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
> <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
> <distribution>repo</distribution>
> </license>
> </licenses>
>
> Luckily, I stumbled across this before committing but I was close to
> publishing a new project to an GPL3 repository and this pom entry would have
> been confusing.
>
> Per the Maven pom guidelines <http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Licenses>:
>
> *Note that a project should list only licenses that may apply directly to
> this project, and not list licenses that apply to this project's
> dependencies.*
>
> Again, no biggie. Maybe it is no big deal.
>
> -Luther
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org