You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jcp-open@apache.org by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com> on 2007/05/10 22:49:05 UTC
public archives
Is there any reason why this list should
not be publically archived? There is a
pending infra request to rename this list
jcp-discuss and open that one, but I think
jcp-open is a fine name, and would prefer
to just make the archives publically available.
--
Joe Schaefer
Re: public archives
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com>.
"Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com> writes:
> No, there's no reason. I thought they were. Hence "jcp-open"
Fixed, thanks. Would you now like to get us started
on a summary+discussion of the current situation with
Harmony and JSR-176?
ps- don't forget to change the Subject header.
--
Joe Schaefer
Re: public archives
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
No, there's no reason. I thought they were. Hence "jcp-open"
geir
On May 10, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> Is there any reason why this list should
> not be publically archived? There is a
> pending infra request to rename this list
> jcp-discuss and open that one, but I think
> jcp-open is a fine name, and would prefer
> to just make the archives publically available.
>
> --
> Joe Schaefer
Re: public archives
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
On 5/10/07, Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com> wrote:
>
> Is there any reason why this list should
> not be publically archived? There is a
> pending infra request to rename this list
> jcp-discuss and open that one, but I think
> jcp-open is a fine name, and would prefer
> to just make the archives publically available.
>
> --
> Joe Schaefer
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com